Skip to comments.
Barack Obama risks infighting with his team of 'csars'
The Telegraph ^
| 1/15/2009
| Alex Spillius
Posted on 01/15/2009 7:23:13 PM PST by markomalley
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 next last
To: Wally_Kalbacken
will not take 4 years. 4 months???
21
posted on
01/15/2009 7:39:27 PM PST
by
camas
To: Cicero
Whats a Csar? British for Czar or Tsar?
22
posted on
01/15/2009 7:40:28 PM PST
by
markomalley
(Extra ecclesiam nulla salus)
To: Wally_Kalbacken
Four years is all Obambi is going to get, at best. There are too many Dems who are chomping at the bit for 2012. Barry is a placeholder.
23
posted on
01/15/2009 7:40:30 PM PST
by
Army Air Corps
(Four fried chickens and a coke)
To: Army Air Corps
Looters is the most accurate term alright
24
posted on
01/15/2009 7:40:46 PM PST
by
GeronL
(A woodchuck would chuck as much wood as a woodchuck could chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood)
To: markomalley
Silly, boy, Obie doesn't plan on making any decisions. We will be governed by committee. If the committee chooses poorly the committee goes under the bus. Presto, new committee.
25
posted on
01/15/2009 7:40:49 PM PST
by
gov_bean_ counter
( Barak Obama: Pontificator in Chief and Poster Child for the Peter Principle)
To: GeronL
Nope. But there is precious little that they do understand.
26
posted on
01/15/2009 7:41:14 PM PST
by
Army Air Corps
(Four fried chickens and a coke)
To: gov_bean_ counter
We will be governed by committee. If the committee chooses poorly the committee goes under the bus. Presto, new committee. Will he call it the "Politburo?"
27
posted on
01/15/2009 7:41:42 PM PST
by
markomalley
(Extra ecclesiam nulla salus)
To: markomalley
I’m telling you, with the Clinton retreads (think power family grab), the Kennedy’s (same power family deal), the “Czar”’s (think Cardinals and such) dancing around the newly annointed One, I am having Tudor years flashing through my head.
Except they don’t use the ax, now they use airplanes and suicides using 2 bullets to the back of the head.
To: markomalley
Frankly, it should read:
Barack Obama risks infighting with his team of ‘scars’
29
posted on
01/15/2009 7:48:20 PM PST
by
This Just In
(Support Christian Homeschoolers)
To: Army Air Corps
and the Congress Critters.
30
posted on
01/15/2009 7:48:28 PM PST
by
rod1
To: Cicero
I think it’s the same as a Tzar.
31
posted on
01/15/2009 7:53:02 PM PST
by
xp38
To: markomalley
I honestly don’t think so. Do a google search for Csar and you won’t find anything to do with Czars. And Dictionary.com, which usually gives British variants, says it stands for Combat Search and Rescue.
32
posted on
01/15/2009 7:54:57 PM PST
by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: Cicero
I honestly dont think so. Do a google search for Csar and you wont find anything to do with Czars. And Dictionary.com, which usually gives British variants, says it stands for Combat Search and Rescue. Sounds like time for a letter to the managing editor of the Telegraph ;-)
33
posted on
01/15/2009 7:56:06 PM PST
by
markomalley
(Extra ecclesiam nulla salus)
To: Wally_Kalbacken
“she’ gone”
Yeah, but she won’t be trouble as a senator anymore. Wasn’t that the plan?
34
posted on
01/15/2009 7:56:39 PM PST
by
freeangel
( (free speech is only good until someone else doesn't like what you say))
To: xp38
Actually, Tzar is apparently another variant, although I’ve never actually seen it used anywhere.
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/czar
But I think Csar is bizarre. You regularly find spelling errors on the front page of the NY Times, and I think maybe the British press is succumbing to the same disease. Decades of Labour Party dumbing down of the schools can’t be helping.
35
posted on
01/15/2009 8:01:12 PM PST
by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: markomalley
Hear, hear!
The purge has only just begun. Wait for his Geheimstadtspolizei to ascend
upon the the constitutionally law abiding folk of this land.
They WILL have a fight upon their hands.
Remember......we have the guns!
Deutscher, out
To: goodnesswins
37
posted on
01/15/2009 8:18:16 PM PST
by
adm5
(YOU CANNOT FIX CAPITALISM WITH SOCIALISM! -Glenn Beck)
To: markomalley
OBama NEEDS these Czars, because he, himself, is totally clueless.
38
posted on
01/15/2009 8:31:01 PM PST
by
Paradox
(When the left have no one to villainize, they'll turn on each other.)
To: markomalley
“Czars” who are not cabinet members, and not subject to Senate confirmation, are unconstitutional as a violation of separation of powers.
But that constitution thing is like so yesterday, why bother with it?
39
posted on
01/15/2009 8:40:43 PM PST
by
henkster
(When I was young I was told anyone could be President. Now I believe it.)
To: markomalley
40
posted on
01/15/2009 8:49:53 PM PST
by
dianed
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson