Posted on 01/12/2009 8:42:32 PM PST by dascallie
Obama's Intelligence Adviser Involved in Security Breach
Monday, January 12, 2009 1:46 PM
Obama’s top terrorism and intelligence adviser, John O. Brennan, heads a firm that was cited in March for breaching sensitive files in the State Department’s passport office, according to a State Department Inspector General’s report released this past July.
The security breach, first reported by the Washington Times and later confirmed by State Department spokesman Sean McCormack, involved a contract employee of Brennan’s firm, The Analysis Corp., which has earned millions of dollars providing intelligence-related consulting services to federal agencies and private companies.
During a State Department briefing on March 21, 2008, McCormack confirmed that the contractor had accessed the passport files of presidential candidates Barack Obama, Hillary Rodham Clinton, and John McCain, and that the inspector general had launched an investigation.
Sources who tracked the investigation tell Newsmax that the main target of the breach was the Obama passport file, and that the contractor accessed the file in order to “cauterize” the records of potentially embarrassing information.
“They looked at the McCain and Clinton files as well to create confusion,” one knowledgeable source told Newsmax. “But this was basically an attempt to cauterize the Obama file.”
At the time of the breach, Brennan was working as an unpaid adviser to the Obama campaign.
"This individual's actions were taken without the knowledge or direction of anyone at The Analysis Corp. and are wholly inconsistent with our professional and ethical standards," Brennan’s company said in a statement sent to reporters after the passport breach was made public.
(Excerpt) Read more at newsmax.com ...
Gee ya think. Passport files contain citizenship information. Who'd a thunk it?
Obviously not the DUmmies at CNN.
Politicization of intelligence proceeds apace.
The guy was a donor, did this favor, got the quid pro quo of the offer of DCI but shied away when Hussein's monkey-fairies screeched about waterboarding.
Wait til they learn of Panetta's complicity in extreme rendition.
Johnsen is rebuilding Gorelick's Wall.
The "change" is the crypto-islamo-commie from Kenyanistan on the throne ordering the gates opened for Ahmadinejad's Trojan Horse.
This sounds interesting, files I suppose are more stringently backed up and with more secure copies since its been found our enemies wish to deploy ESM devices to try and cripple us electronically.
I firmly believe the record of Obamas passport is being reviewed in a certain chamber at this very minute.
All of the evidence cannot remove Obama from the office because of the football field size of dominoes that will collapse if he is pulled out right now, so I am betting the gameplan is to let him act out as POTUS, there will be no mention of this to the public, Obama will just be an actor until a convenient time that he can either be removed without causing riots and panic or his term expires.
There are powers that can do this, for all intents and purposes everyone will see him in position as POTUS, he will be registered as President but behind the scenes more prudent and legal minds will lead America.
Very few dominoes, but the threats of violence will now be ratcheted up by the Axelrod operatives. The existence of the INS port of entry doc from 1961 will light their fuse. But this guy is not more important than our Constitutional contract being abrogated by a affirmative action fraud.
I wonder what was cauterized during the blackout in Hawaii ?
Yes I hear that threats are being made against at least one individual I know of that frequents here and is a staunch opponent to Obama.
its the age of the internet
there is really no true anonymity, case in point was the son of a ranking democrat that hacked Sarah Palins emails, he thought his Ananomizer software kept him hidden, it lasted like three seconds.
it can work both ways, we can track them too.
For what it’s worth, I posted this locally elsewhere topic being concervative media unwillingness to address issues....
To: Nokia; laweeks; MHGinTN; pissant; Kevmo
Ref.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2163242/posts
33 posted on Monday, January 12, 2009 9:42:00 PM by laweeks
The only explanation I’ve heard for the conserv pundits to ignore this issue is that they have come to recognize that
certain events had to take place in order to hold BO to rights.
No efforts to put this issue forth prior to the election got any traction.
And pushing the issue was against the “kid glove” republican approach to this election.
[this is much more a condemnation of the RNC and McCain than it is the conserv media in that said media was given nothing to work with. The evidence was not well digested at this point. And very few wanted the tin hat label without some cover (or at least acknowledgement) by the RNC/conservative leaders]
After the election, realize the following had to take place in order to establish plaintiffs (those hurt) and defendants(BO et al)...
- The electors have to certify BO and Plugs. In spite of efforts to educate, the electors as a group, blindly accepted the tainted evidence of eligibility.
- The congress had to certify the elector votes. Again, in spite of efforts to recruit honorable reps and sens to legitimately question, NO HONORABLE REPS OR SENS WERE FOUND!
This is probably the most disturbing logical conclusion.
Meanwhile several lawsuits were brought, denied, rejected, appealed and BO’s phantom position was represented in at least some by expensive law firms. And many rightly question why this tactic would be taken rather than simply producing a $10.00 document.
Still no food for the conservative pundits to hang on at this point.
Now....
We have multiple cases before the supreme court in various stages and with various dates of consideration.
Each case has some merit - if you have followed this issue. But none contend that they have solid evidence of wrongdoing. All require the production of back documentation of BO’s legitimacy (cause NO ONE knows who this clown really is!!!)
Getting the documentation “right now” doesn’t disqualify BO simply because there must be a court debate about both the evidence and the constitutional presidential requirements.
However, BO knows there are constitutional issues involved(he claims expertise in this area) and realizes that he could be forced to produce documentation at some point.
So, BO can...
1. Withdraw now under some silly excuse.
2. Release everything and hope for the best.
3. Persist, be sworn in, and hope for no exposure - ever.
4. Persist, be sworn in, and perjure himself.
And there are a couple of other possibilities....
1. All discovered documentation is complete, valid,
and completely aboveboard.
2. All discovered documentation has been swept clean
and cannot be exposed for years or ever.
Judge Roberts is forcing the issue.
He will swear in Obama on Jan. 20. Why not?
He knows, as do the other justices, the issues and the ramifications - but not necessarily all the facts.
He knows that Obama’s inauguration will either be valid or perjured.
If, upon consideration of the cases filed and to be filed, Obama is “clean”, all has been done properly under the constitution.
If, any filed cases should cause the release of information that causes eligibility to be REJECTED, Obama has committed perjury and BO as POTUS is invalid.
If Obama has committed perjury/fraud, his standing is invalid and, in essence, he never
became president. Some submit that certain circumstances would result in his expulsion as an illegal alien – but that is dependant on documentation not yet available.
If Obama has not committed perjury, then his fraud can continue just subject to random
citizen cases claiming he was never eligible in the first place.
BIG NOTE…
Obama only commits perjury if he accepts the oath of office from Judge Roberts!
(provided of course that he is indeed the fraud that many rightly contend)
Therefore, it is a good thing to hail the inauguration and wish well blah, blah, blah.
And enjoy the precise mechanizations of the Supreme Court aka Judge Roberts.
TO THE ORIGINAL QUESTION….
“Where are they? They could be in line for a bail out. Fox is supposedly being bought (partially) by the Saudis “
That still doesn’t answer why there’s been a total conservative blackout both on the radio, tv, and newsprint . . . After all, Ann Coulter (and I love her dearly) is supposedly a Constitutional lawyer . . . why NO COMMENT WHATSOEVER anywhere, anyplace, at any time.
All the other controversial crap about Obama was thrashed so thoroughly these past couple years, but NOTHING ABOUT THIS! NOTHING! Apparently, Rush, Levin, and Hannity (et al) are screening ALL CALLS to eliminate anything about this attack on our constitution. I don’t get it!
Sounds like it should be a SLAM DUNK! Do they know something that we don’t?
33 posted on Monday, January 12, 2009 9:42:00 PM by laweeks
Bottom line is that Rush/Hannity/Beck and others don’t do investigative journalism. Their business is fronting known facts and issues to their audience – plus commentary.
As some would say…
They got no ammo in their magazines.
It’s kinda unfair to blame them for the lack of facts surrounding
Barack’s tremendous farce.
The Supreme Court is fixin’ to load those mags.
It will then be up to our favorite commentators to
lock, load,
aim, and fire.
Have faith.
Like my Dad told me….
“they always get theirs in the end”
Kinda simple but (in my experience) true.
36 posted on Tuesday, January 13, 2009 1:27:57 AM by bossmechanic (If all else fails, hit it with a hammer)
My current point being that most of the evidence is there but it only matters inasmuch as the Supreme Court deals with it.
This may explain in some detail about this ominous collusino at the top of this Pyramid scheme of schemes to get Obama into office.
http://www.ifusionsoft.com/content/blogs/00000047.asp
Hurry up and wait time.
Thanks, this is the exact impressions I get when I look at the big picture, we should welcome this inauguration as if it truly was christ coming back from the dead, because at that very stage everything changes, the hobbles are flung aside and the horses will run then.
From a view of the best interest of America we must give them their drug fix so to speak, and while they are sleeping of the euphoria of success and in your face comments to the conservatives the legal clockwork will start its explorable countdown.
Obama may have won the Kentucky Derby but his remaining days will be just public stud service.
Mossad knows.
yitbos
Obama is also involved with Hsu, the other Ponzi scheme that started with the Clintons.
It's sort of a "soft" coup. Everything seems to point to it. ACORN was standing by, no doubt, to initiate riots if Obama lost. I think Obama's just like Odinga. I know he's absolutely un-American at best. I really need to get a gun for protection.
It seems to me that his swearing in wouldn’t be the only case of perjury - didn’t he have to declare to each state of the Union that he was qualified to hold office under the Constitution?
Sounds like Brennan was one of Obama’s plumbers.
Well, I hope we aren’t both wrong. And I like your Derby analogy.
Certainly I can’t see what’s coming but I can do two things...
1. Encourage each family I know to simply prepare like in tornado status - most families aren’t and should be..
2. Educate our friends, coworkers, and kids as to what the constitution and law really means.
I have never cared about people color or other folks religions - until- obviously, some religions want the death of Christians or, indeed, anything but muslim.
Real awakening-kinda like WHAT THE HECK ARE YOU THINGIN’
sort of revelation.
And to your other point...
Yup - Ya can “let” the horses run or,
the horses will run anyway.
I kinda prefer the wild ones myself.
But I got corraled and so should mr obamakentuckyderby. And I would match my stud service against his in a heart beat.
Lets assume SCOTUS really has Americas best interest in hand and yet still adhere to the Constitution.
They allow the inauguration to proceed though I have a gut feeling its going to be postponed for “weather” reasons.
Either recently, now or immediately after the ceremony SCOTUS or whatever acronym approaches Obama and they lay their cards out and show the Royal Flush against his busted flush, they own him, his soul, his speeches and his freedom.
Obama suddenly starts leaning to the center, or has he already done that?
We will look at this figure of a president and we will judge him and his supporters will cry day after day that he is becoming more of a republican, in some ways he is more so than McCain was right now.
I am not advocating him in ANY way shape or form, he is a tic stuck in our scrotum and if you yank him out now his head will pop off and create a worse infection.
His own party will furnish the fires of rejection and then the rest of the body will will appear and fall away.
His own followers will bring him down because he wears the signature coat of guilt.
To your point...
Yes.
And he also applied to the IL bar assoc. saying he had only one name in his backround! No mention on his (pitiful)website that he has multiple names as evidenced via indonesia school and bc records.
But closer to your point...
If he has deceived all 50 states regarding his eligibility, he is indeed - like well and truly f..ked.
He did sign eligibility papers for each state as far as I know. But, no state secretary felt they had the authority to verify his eligibility. Therefore, it kept filtering down.
When no one cries FOUL, the masses will just go along.
And the “masses” are generally ill-informed. That’s not a cut on the “masses”, it’s just a factual observation that CURRENTLY 18% watch the news(local/state/internation).
Think about it...
It’s a lot easier to glom onto a messiah(fake or not)
than it is to confront the much more complicated real
world.
Not likely. The weather at Reagan's 2nd inaugural (January 1985) was bitterly cold, so cold that all DC residents were advised to stay indoors if at all possible. The Inauguration wasn't postponed; Reagan's swearing-in took place in a private ceremony indoors and the Inaugural itself took place inside the Capitol.
But you may be right, if the weather is inclement and the organizers decide that crowds are of such a size that no public building would be available to handle them, it may be "rescheduled."
I am not advocating him in ANY way shape or form, he is a tic stuck in our scrotum and if you yank him out now his head will pop off and create a worse infection.
I once had a tick stuck in my arm. I removed it by holding a lit match next to its behind. The little bugger backed out quickly (head and all) and I was then able to burn it to a crisp. :)
Remember that Clinton was disbarred by the Supreme Court on Monday, October 1, 2001 (following an April disbarment lawsuit by the Arkansas Supreme Court, related to his giving misleading testimony in the Paula Jones sexual harassment case). http://famguardian.org/Subjects/LawAndGovt/News/ClintonDisbar-011001.htm
I do have faith that justice will somehow catch up with BO.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.