Posted on 12/07/2008 6:18:11 AM PST by pissant
Press Release: Lightfoot v Bowen...
Mission Viejo, Ca. (NS/OrlyTaitz) -
Let me first start by saying I recieved a phonecall from Attorney Dr. Orly Taitz who will be in Washington, DC Monday December the 8th to file papers about her lawsuit which involves Barack Obama and his birth certificate...
On December 2nd a Petition for an extraordinary Writ of Mandamus was filed in the Supreme Court of California. This petition (as seen in the attachment) states that Mr. Obama has not proven his "natural born citizen" status and cannot be sworn as a president of the United States and the commander in Chief. There are 7 plaintiffs in this case and they include Vice Presidential candidate for Ron Paul, on the ballot in CA, Ms Gail Lightfoot, 4 electors and two registered voters...
A number of plaintiffs in this action are veterans and former servicemen, that are concerned about a prospect of Mr Obama becoming the Commander in Chief of the US army, without providing any information, as to his citizenship at birth and currently, particularly citizenship of Indonesia, Kenya and Great Britain (Kenya was a British colony in 1961, at the time of Mr. Obama's birth) without providing his immigration records, passports or even as much as the original birth certificate from Hawaii, that is supposed to show the name of the hospital and the name and the signature of the doctor, that can be verified against the vital records from the hospital, Within two days of filing on Friday 12.05.08. at 9:45 PM, the Supreme court of California has issued a denial, that will allow the attorney on the case, Ms. Orly Taitz, an Application for Emergency Stay in the Supreme Court of the United States as early as Monday, the 8Th of December. The case will be reviewed by the Supreme Court Judge Anthony Kennedy...
PDF file of the petition can be found on:
http://drorly.blogspot.com/...
More information on the case will be provided at the press conference at the National Press Club in the Washington DC, to be held on 12.08.08. at 1:30 Eastern time...
Ms. Taitz is also one of two attorneys, representing Ambassador Alan Keyes et all against Ms. Bowen, CA Secretary of State et all. This case will be heard in CA Superior court prior to the Certification of votes...
(pdf file of Keyes v Bowen is also on the drorly.blogspot.com)...
Ms. Taitz has also requested that any supporters of this issue that can present at the National Press Club in Washington, DC please show up to show their support of finding out the truth once and for all about Barack Obama being 'eligible' and meeting the Constitutional requirements required to be our next President...
Orly Taitz, Esq...
26302 La Paz ste 211 Mission Viejo, Ca 92691
To hear more, including interviews about the Obama birth certificate case, go to:
http://thecaptainsamerica.com
bump
Fox News just reported at 10:58am CDT:
“Free Republic blasting away at the birth certificate”
Nice plug
You’re welcome, NoGrayZone.
In 1961 a Hawaiian newspaper published a birth notice for Barack H. Obama. Those proposing that Obama was born elsewhere will have to discredit the notice, in addition to proving the fraudulence of the birth certificate a Republican Hawaiian governor, Linda Lingle, personally asserts she examined and verified.
Linda Lingle never said such a thing. You are reading too many lefty talking points.
Anyone can call their local paper and have an announcement published. Parents and grandparents do it all the time. An announcement, however, does not constitute proof.
Outstanding summation. Thanks for posting it.
and typed in Barack Obama. It has the same date of birth. Look what comes up in city of birth. Don't know how accurate it is. Wonder if someone in that town could verify it ?
I am spreading the news about the Constitutional issue because I think this is very important. Finally some more Freepers are beginning to look into this issue. I am certainly not a “tinfoil hat” wearer but have been following these cases since October.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2144344/posts?page=380#380
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2144360/posts
I ask everyone to go here and read, read, read. Our Constitution must be upheld no matter WHO is President!
http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/
Back then there was probably a young student working in records that had the job of going to a records office on a daily basis and getting copies of the names of all those babies that had just received a copy of a birth certificate regardless of whether they were actually born in Hawaii or anyplace else and then posted those records in the paper.
The newspaper did not know where the birth occurred, they just posted who filed for a certificate.
Its the same if you moved to a different state and you had to re-register your plates, regardless of what the new registration said the owners certificate had the facts of where the vehicle was bought. This is the case here, what we see is in effect a poor attempt to portray a “registration” NOT the “pink slip” of Obamas birth.
We need to get people thinking about the global implications of a man of questionable legitimacy in the white house.
that is very interesting..........
Really? (#129849) by Hank Rand on December 6, 2008 at 9:44 PM "What difference does it make to the future of this country whether Obama was born on US soil? Advocates of this destructive campaign will argue that the Constitutional principle regarding the qualifications for President trumps all others. But how viable will our Constitution be if 5 Supreme Court justices should decide to void 64 million ballots?"
A proponent of the reality that there is an outstanding question that exists relating to Barack Obama's natural born citizenship (not that I have an answer, but rather simply that no answer has been given), my personal opinion is that this has less to do with the merit of this particular Constitutional law...and more to do with the character and integrity of a man who may have gone to such great lengths to, knowingly, break it. And in that course of action, our entire country (not just those who didn't vote for him) and our most coveted process of Democracy (our vote), were defrauded.
If he's found to be ineligible per the Constitution, proving he knowingly and willfully defrauded our people and process, it won't be the Justices who will have disenfranchised 64 million voters. It's Barack Obama.
How many times are you prepared to claim "you fell down the stairs" for this man? I was an initial supporter. I started seeing very real and very questionable issues raised about the nature of his past associations, and the laughable explanations he would give...and I was sure it would hurt him in the press and among supporters. But what did I see?
The press and most supporters to engrossed in their partisanship to care. In fact, the more reasonable questions came up about him...the harder the press and the 64 million that same press brainwashed, drove to the hoop for him.
As I stood back watching this, again, as an initial supporter of his, even making phone calls on his behalf...I realized what I was seeing, was nothing short of WEIRD. Just, plain, weird. And I thought this birth certificate issue (check that, "Certificate of Live Birth" issue...as opposed to "Certification of Live Birth") was cleared up a long time ago. I thought there was no way the DNC would have been capable of such a gross oversight. Then the court cases came up, and nothing was done to quell the question.
What finally landed me understanding that something is not right, is when Chiyome Fukino, Director of Health for Hawaii, released the statement about his birth. That statement actually did more harm than good, and it only demonstrated further how moronic far too many public officials and people in the media and governing bodies, think Americans are.
Sure, America has it's slew of idiots. And sure, the aisle that questions Barack Obama's natural born and/or properly maintained citizenship statuses has it's smattering of fringe wingnuts. But just because one contingent of people happen to be on board, doesn't nullify the fact that the question is still outstanding.
I hear the same 5 refutations over, and over, and over. "He posted his birth certificate on his website", "Factcheck proved it", "The state of Hawaii released a statement saying he was born there", "There was a birth announcement in a Hawaiian newspaper", "Judges meritoriously threw it out as 'frivolous'"; and while each of those statements hold an element of truth, they're also easily debunked. And "truth" is objective. There is no debunking it.
We should be able to move past this on to more subjective and productive lines of communication...with all the dissent we're accustomed to...forging, like competition, improvement. But here we are. And one man can answer this objective question. And sure, not everyone will get on board if he were to release his college records and actual Certificate of Live Birth (as opposed to the factually less credible, more easily attained and more easily forged "Certification" - which bears no corroborating evidence like the hospital or doctor's name)...but many would get on board.
Coming off a platform of transparency, directly in to a promised pursuit for unity...why leave so many of us divided on what is a simple and objectively debunked question ... if the Certification is authentic, the it's more credible parent - the Certificate, exists?
But rather than produce it, he has fought those requests so fiercely that he's allowed the same requests to land in court rooms...where he continues to fight them. Why? So rather than quell the reasonable, objective and easily answered outstanding question ... he opts non disclosure.
I wrote somewhere else that the production of Certificate of Live Birth is a very small price to pay for unity. And yet, here we are. And Barack Obama, and Barack Obama only, is responsible for that.
I am certain that beyond any reasonable doubt, because Barack Obama, and Barack Obama only, can quell it...with an actual Certificate of Live Birth, and he has watched requests transition to court cases, and still refuses. So as a first order of business, in a promised pursuit for unity, he leaves us divided, on what should be a very simple, very objective, very basic matter.
Who among us can applaud that? "I do, Hank. Because you're all just whackjobs." That's all well and good if that's your opinion. My brother said to me, "Yeah but if we pull him out, we're going to look corrupt to the rest of the world." I replied, "I'd rather look corrupt and not be it, than be corrupt and not look it."
So goes my position on being called a whackjob, for maintaining through nothing more than logic and fact, that there is a still outstanding question regarding Barack Obama's natural born and properly maintained citizenship statuses.
I'd rather be called a whackjob and stand by truth, than submit to mistruths and be called sound. I didn't hear any of the 5 standard press talking points in your piece, which leads me to believe the transition I anticipated is occurring. That is, virtually all of supporters (and I don't know if you were one prior to November 4th or not), will go from, "He didn't commit fraud, he is a natural born citizen", to "So what if he committed fraud, so what if he isn't a natural born citizen."
I've challenged others, staunch supporters in fact, as to whether or not they'd concede a gross misstep in character and judgement, and support his being held accountable for that, if he did commit this fraud. They've uniformly claimed they would.
This article, blog, whatever it is...demonstrates the first piece I've actually seen that goes out of it's way to say, "No. I wouldn't. Barack Obama can lie, cheat and steal all he wants. And if he gets held accountable for it, it's the fault of the Justices ... because Barack Obama himself, is simply incapable of wrongdoing."
Running that red light you sit at, day after day, when no one is looking, is pretty harmless too. But you know it's wrong. This man, if not a natural born and properly maintained citizen of the United States, will have knowingly and willfully cheated our entire country, and more critical than that, our absolutely, inherently, unquestionably most coveted process of democracy, in what can only be articulated as a relentless pursuit for unapologetic, integrity-free, and division-inducing pursuit for power.Link.
pingalingaling
Obama is a Netizen just as the Constitution requires. /sarc/
It is the repsonsibility of the candidate applying for the high level secuirty job to provide access to his history and records. We The People are not obliged to prove a damned thing to reject a fraudulent affirmative action candidate poseur for president.
That siad, the notice has about as much weight in the process of vetting this poseur as the opinion of my cat has in choosing whether to read Freerepublic or not ... carry on
Yo are lying. On purpose or because you’re too dumb to get the facts straight? Lingle never stated that she had verified a vault copy with or without proof of Hawaiian birth. Another little lie you’re caught peddling!
Massatwosh!ts! That figures ...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.