Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Lamestreams covering themselves, just in case.
1 posted on 12/06/2008 10:40:20 PM PST by STARWISE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: SE Mom; Bahbah; penelopesire; Miss Didi; rodguy911; gpapa; RonDog; RaginApache; FlingWingFlyer; ...

~~Surprise from the AP .. PING!


2 posted on 12/06/2008 10:41:05 PM PST by STARWISE ((They (Dims) think of this WOT as Bush's war, not America's war-RichardMiniter, respected OBL author)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: STARWISE

Obama’s Mother
A CIA Cut-Out

Obama’s mother Stanley was recruited by the Intell agencies in the late 1950’s with one purpose in mind. She was to infiltrate the rising black nationalist and civil rights organizations that were rapidly forming at the time.

While the FBI was well aware of the rising tide of radical black American’s infatuation with Communism, the federal agencies had one small problem. Due to a long history of overt racism in their hiring practices, they had no black Americans as agents.
Therefore there was no one to infiltrate these radical black organizations.

Our country’s Intell agencies had a big problem on their hands.
What to do? They decided to immediately begin recruiting black FBI (and CIA) agents but it would still take years to train them in order to infiltrate these groups.

They then came up with an interim solution.

They began to recruit young white women and use them to get inside the groups. Stanley Anne Durham was one of those white women. Growing up in the boredom of Kansas, young, restless and yearning for an adventure, she was an easy mark for recruitment.

Of course, the leading factor in this recruitment was sex.
Because there was only one way to gain the intimacy necessary to gather good intelligence, the young white women would have to have sex with these men. They had to create a relationship with them in order to gather data.

Barack Hussein Obama Jr. is probably the result of one of these sexual encounters. From all outward appearances it would appear that Stanley Anne Durham was passed around certain radical types like Frank Marshall and Barack Obama Senior. It is very likely that no one knows who is the real father of Barack Obama. Not even the President-elect.

At the time of his birth, or shortly afterwards, someone inside the Intell community decided to take the unwanted baby - born of Intell intrigue - and use that child for the ultimate infiltration. And that is why we don’t know anything about Barack Hussein Obama. He has been wiped clean. He is the ultimate cut out.


4 posted on 12/06/2008 10:49:19 PM PST by television is just wrong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: STARWISE

someone emailed me the previous article.


5 posted on 12/06/2008 10:50:16 PM PST by television is just wrong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: STARWISE

I don’t see how the Supremes could refuse to hear this. If for no other reason than to “put it to rest”. Or at least that’s the reason they could give to cover their butts.


7 posted on 12/06/2008 10:51:03 PM PST by no dems (GOP Ticket for 2012: Sarah Palin and a Conservative Male with a Hispanic surname.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: STARWISE

I’m happy to see this story trickle into the MSM. I recently heard a soundbite about the issue on ABC news radio.

I love how the MSM keeps mentioning the BC issue in the same breath as “conspiracy theories.” Who said anything about a conspiracy?

Why didn’t AP mention that bho has spent hundreds of thousands of dollars to dismiss law suits against him instead of spending ten dollars to show us the original vault copy of his birth certificate?


8 posted on 12/06/2008 10:53:16 PM PST by GoodDay (Palin for POTUS 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: STARWISE
Absolutely. They certainly don't want everything “hangin out there” only to find out “their man” is/was/has been a fraud from the very day he was born!
10 posted on 12/06/2008 10:54:51 PM PST by singfreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: STARWISE

What a bunch of nutters. Face it. Obama won. Get over it. Get a life. Take a shower. Read a book.


13 posted on 12/06/2008 10:58:52 PM PST by Texas Eagle (Appreciate me now and avoid the rush.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All

Poll:

Do you think the Supreme Court should hear the case challenging President-elect Barack Obama’s right to be president based on his citizenship at birth?

http://washingtontimes.com/polls/2008/dec/Obama-citizenship/#comments


42 posted on 12/06/2008 11:53:32 PM PST by unspun (PRAY & WORK FOR FREEDOM - investigatingobama.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LucyT

Of possible interest to your list.


45 posted on 12/07/2008 12:35:09 AM PST by Slings and Arrows ("If one cannot learn from the mistakes of others, one might as well become a Democrat."--E. Friesner)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: STARWISE; Texas Eagle

Should something interesting come from the SC actions, the biggest loser will be the MSM for its gross negligence and exposure as frauds.

Years ago while at grad school, one of my gay, liberal associates heard me lament a potentially stolen senatorial election in LA. His guidance: “get over it,” which fairly well explains the liberal/Democrat/ACORN election mindset.

“Getting over it” ends on bended knee before human masters.


58 posted on 12/07/2008 8:48:58 AM PST by mj81
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: STARWISE

I have never believed in conspiracy theories; not Elvis lives, the lunar landing staged, JFK assination, 9/11 inside job, Illuminati, floride in the water, or Roswell. I do believe that there is SOMETHING dirty in the Obama citizenship issue. I don’t know what it is but there is something dirty.


60 posted on 12/07/2008 8:54:15 AM PST by Proud2BeRight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: STARWISE

The SCOTUS has to know what’s going on. For them to not even to ask 0 to produce a BC is criminal.


67 posted on 12/07/2008 10:07:38 AM PST by Waco (Oath? What oath?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson