To: Arkinsaw
Arkinsaw said:
"I am not opposed to the matter being taken to court to be explored.
But I shake my head at the number of people here who actually think that it is going to result in Obama not being allowed to take office. " Is that because you believe that Obama is a natural born citizen, or because you believe that the Court will ignore his foreign birth? Just which Justices will decide that the clear mandate in the Constitution is to be ignored?
If the requirement regarding citizenship is susceptible to Supreme Court nullification, then why can't the Supreme Court simply nullify the requirement for a majority of electoral college votes? Let's have the Supreme Court declare McCain the winner; after all, the requirement for a majority is just one of those "living Constitution" provisions that is obviously outdated.
114 posted on
12/04/2008 10:46:34 PM PST by
William Tell
(RKBA for California (rkba.members.sonic.net) - Volunteer by contacting Dave at rkba@sonic.net)
To: William Tell
Is that because you believe that Obama is a natural born citizen, or because you believe that the Court will ignore his foreign birth? Just which Justices will decide that the clear mandate in the Constitution is to be ignored?
1) No idea. 2) Will ignore anything that would cause riots. 3) Most of them.
If the requirement regarding citizenship is susceptible to Supreme Court nullification, then why can't the Supreme Court simply nullify the requirement for a majority of electoral college votes? Let's have the Supreme Court declare McCain the winner; after all, the requirement for a majority is just one of those "living Constitution" provisions that is obviously outdated.
Sure, go ahead if you can get it.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson