Posted on 12/03/2008 8:36:45 AM PST by Lucky9teen
An imperfect body might be just what the doctor ordered for women and key to their economic success, an anthropologist now says.
While pop culture seems to worship the hourglass figure for females, with a tiny waist, big boobs and curvy hips à la Marilyn Monroe, this may not be optimal, says Elizabeth Cashdan of the University of Utah.
That's because the hormones that make women physically stronger, more competitive and better able to deal with stress also tend to redistribute fat from the hips to the waist.
So in societies and situations where women are under pressure to procure resources and otherwise bring home the bacon, they may be less likely to have the classic hourglass figure, Cashdan hypothesizes in the December issue of the journal Current Anthropology.
Curve crazy
Until now, scientists (and apparently Western society) thought a curvy figure trumped other body shapes. The idea was based on results from medical studies that suggested a curvy waist-to-hip ratio of 0.7 or lower (meaning the waist is significantly narrower than the hips) is associated with higher fertility and lower rates of chronic disease.
In addition, past research has revealed that men prefer a ratio of 0.7 or lower when looking for a mate. The preference makes perfect sense, according to evolutionary psychologists, because the low ratio is a reliable signal of a healthy, fertile woman. Along those lines, Playboy centerfolds tend to have a waist-to-hip ratio of 0.68, Cashdan found.
However, women around the world tend to have larger waist-to-hip ratios (more cylindrical than hourglass-shaped) than is considered optimal by these medical and social standards.
(Excerpt) Read more at livescience.com ...
Yeah she might be hot, but her picture is smarter than she is.
That’s because the men who run the fashion industry are mostly homosexuals who think 14-year-old boys are sexy.
Whole Lotta Rosie
I wanna tell you a story 'bout a woman I know When it comes to lovin' Oh, she steals the show She ain't exactly pretty Ain't exaclty small 42-39-56 You can say she's got it all
Never had a woman Never had a woman like you Doin' all the things Doin' all the things you do Ain't no fairy story Ain't no skin and bone But you give it all you got Weighin' in at nineteen stone
You're a whole lot of woman A whole lot of woman Whole lotta Rosie You're a whole lotta woman
Oh honey you can do it Do it to me all night long Only one that turns Only one that turns me on All through the night-time Right around the clock To my surprise Rosie never stops
You're a whole lot of woman A whole lot of woman Whole lotta Rosie You're a whole lotta woman
Well, let's not get carried away either. Anna Nicole at her best was a voluptuous and extremely beautiful woman. At her heaviest, it was rather too much even for full-figure lovers such as myself.
who killed jessica simpson and propped up her corpse?
Mega - Truth !!
Just another feel-good message that’s it’s okay to be fat.
Aint that the truth...blughghchhh
King Impersonator with camel toe...yick
What this study does NOT tell you, is that women who are stressed out, under the gun to provide and take care of the family, DON’T HAVE A LOT OF TIME (or energy for that matter), to do what it takes to be perfectly physically fit.
Just speaking from experience....
true....at her heaviest she was not very attractive...but the same can be said about her after she lost all the weight too, imo, she looked scary and way too thin.
Very cool that such a naturally beautiful woman with a real woman's figure can be such a big star without having to starve herself to look like a skeleton. There's a lot of other less self-confident actresses who I would rather see carrying an extra fifteen or twenty and looking like Kate.
-ccm
Watch for Playboy to soon begin featuring models built like Rosie O’Donnell in the centerfold.
Don't have enough energy? Start getting in shape. You'll be amazed how much energy you have with as little as 30-45 minutes of working out each day....
good for you then.
Oh, and do you have 4 kids, of which one is a teen, 2 are toddlers and one is an infant, that you have to wash, dress, feed, help with homework, take to daycare/school, pick up from said places, drive to school/other activities, make dinner, do housework, etc. etc etc.
Spare me.
I’ll go with the hourglass. Leave it to “scientists” to contradict common sense.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.