The article said — “... organizing plans to challenge, even after the inauguration, every order, every proposal, every piece of paperwork generated by Obama.”
This is what I was saying in posts, before the election, that would happen, if Obama failed to produce the solid proof that he is a natural-born citizen. Every single law that is enacted by Congress will undergo a court case — every last single one will be challenged by *someone* — somewhere....
LOL... good luck Obama, with having a smoothly running Administration... :-)
“Well..., this one has applied on both side, either the Republicans or the Democrats. They’ve *always* called the guy who wins the election. “President Elect so-and-so”.
The practice was likely started by those unfamiliar with the Constitution. Given the fact so many voters, even some on FR, and particularly the MSM want us to believe the election is over, it is my effort the demonstrate otherwise.
“That particular point is not really relevant…”
Excuse me, it is very relevant to my argument.
Your argument seems to focus on the chaos that occurs after O enters office. My argument is that is entirely possible to keep him from office; that the necessary evidence most likely resides in government records available to our Republican politicians. Assuming, of course, there is substance to the impressive amount of circumstantial evidence before us.
In more earthy terms, while it is wise to have an antidote for snake bites it is wiser to take the basic precautions that prevent snake bites.
“Well, very simply, all the laws signed by the President or enacted during his term become invalid and do not need to be followed.”
There are legal arguments on both sides of this issue. Think for a moment about legislation passed by a Congress that had the votes to override a veto by O. Do you think the USSC would invalidate such laws?