“Well..., this one has applied on both side, either the Republicans or the Democrats. They’ve *always* called the guy who wins the election. “President Elect so-and-so”.
The practice was likely started by those unfamiliar with the Constitution. Given the fact so many voters, even some on FR, and particularly the MSM want us to believe the election is over, it is my effort the demonstrate otherwise.
“That particular point is not really relevant…”
Excuse me, it is very relevant to my argument.
Your argument seems to focus on the chaos that occurs after O enters office. My argument is that is entirely possible to keep him from office; that the necessary evidence most likely resides in government records available to our Republican politicians. Assuming, of course, there is substance to the impressive amount of circumstantial evidence before us.
In more earthy terms, while it is wise to have an antidote for snake bites it is wiser to take the basic precautions that prevent snake bites.
“Well, very simply, all the laws signed by the President or enacted during his term become invalid and do not need to be followed.”
There are legal arguments on both sides of this issue. Think for a moment about legislation passed by a Congress that had the votes to override a veto by O. Do you think the USSC would invalidate such laws?
You said — “Do you think the USSC would invalidate such laws?”
In a word — “yes”...., they do so all the time.
Whether a law is passed by a signature from a President, or passed by no signature from a President or passed by overriding a veto from the President — the US Supreme Court *can* and *does* invalidate such laws as being unconstitutional all the time (and/or affirming them, too)... that’s what they do... LOL...
You said — “Excuse me, it is very relevant to my argument.”
Well, what I was saying that wasn’t relevant is the MSM continuing the same practice that practically all the citizens do, too — which is *saying* “President Elect”. That’s not relevant.
What is relevant is what do the Electors do and what can be done about that...
It’s not the “title” that someone uses that is relevant — but rather the *facts* related to the Electors and what can be done legally in that regard. The “title” makes no difference in this fight...