Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 11/22/2008 12:24:12 PM PST by lewisglad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: lewisglad

Ir ia “odd” that Coleman has never gained a single vote in the proceedings, it seems. Such is MN.


2 posted on 11/22/2008 12:25:38 PM PST by Theodore R. (The most frightening words in the English language: The American people!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lewisglad

With so many challenged ballots, the canvassing board is going to end up deciding the election. I believe the board is split between parties, with the Democrat Acorn Sec of State as the tiebreaker in the event of a split...

I think Norm may as well clear out his senate desk now.


8 posted on 11/22/2008 12:33:36 PM PST by Chet 99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lewisglad

As of 10 minutes ago the latest numbers show Coleman leading by 147 votes:

http://ww2.startribune.com/news/metro/elections/returns/2008/recount/msenco.html


9 posted on 11/22/2008 12:34:49 PM PST by moose2004 (Drill, Drill, Drill, Drill, Drill, Drll And Then Drill Some More)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lewisglad

Here’s the link to an update. http://ww2.startribune.com/news/metro/elections/returns/2008/recount/msenco.html

Coleman is back up by 147, with 65% of votes counted. I am stunned to see Coleman has actually GAINED votes in Hennepin County.


10 posted on 11/22/2008 12:36:04 PM PST by ScottinVA (Gloucester County, VA -- Standing for America! 63% for McCain-Palin on 4 Nov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lewisglad

I am certain the counting will stop as soon as Franken gets a lead.


17 posted on 11/22/2008 12:42:58 PM PST by Recovering_Democrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lewisglad

Just once, I’d like to see a recount where the Republican candidate actually grows his lead over the cheating weasel that’s on the Democrat side.

Then I’d like it to happen every subsequent time. If Franken wins, Coleman needs to challenge each and every vote for Franken and demand that they be matched to actual living adults that are properly registered to vote.


27 posted on 11/22/2008 12:57:29 PM PST by Two Kids' Dad (((( Democrats are just a little lower than maggots and dung beetles in my estimation ))))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lewisglad

I have no doubt that Democrats would swear in Caligula’s horse if it meant 60 votes, but sometimes I can’t help thinking that the thought of this clown sitting among these “illustrious” Senators has more than a few Dems nervous. I see a whole lot more Dems pulling for the Georgia seat than fighting for Franken. Don’t get me wrong-—they’ll take his vote. I just think they won’t cry very hard if he loses.


33 posted on 11/22/2008 1:09:30 PM PST by Mangia E Statti Zitto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lewisglad
This theft (or attempted theft) of an election is a vivid example of the unprincipled nature of the Democratic Party.

What they, the Dems, might not understand is that this is their lot in politics forever more.

Even if they get their collectivist Utopia, they will have to cheat, cover-up, silence critics, lie, accuse, and blame for ever.

You would think at least some of them would get tired of fraud, deceit and covering up.

.

40 posted on 11/22/2008 1:55:18 PM PST by Seaplaner (Never give in. Never give in. Never...except to convictions of honour and good sense. W. Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lewisglad

The Somali Muslims that this administration seemes hell bent on letting into the country voted unanimously for their boy Franken...but their pirate buddy votes have yet to be counted.


42 posted on 11/22/2008 2:16:33 PM PST by eleni121 (EN TOUTO NIKA!! +)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lewisglad

Everyone is interpreting these recount numbers incorrectly.

Franken’s gains are NOT the result of new votes being “found” - there are a trivial number of “undervotes” being found. Virtually all of the changes in the counts are a result of votes being temporarily removed from the tallies of both Coleman and Franken due to challenges.

It’s just that Coleman is having more votes “removed” than Franken - probably almost entirely due to Franken challenges. When a ballot is challenged, it is temporarily removed from the count. So the changes in the official tallies don’t really mean too much - it’s all about the final dispensation of the challenged ballots which have been removed from the count temporarily.

Here are the numbers. So far, Coleman’s official vote count has decreased by 603 votes, and Franken’s official vote count has decreased by 535 votes for a net “gain” to Franken of 68 votes. (215 lead - 68 Franken gain = 147 current Coleman lead)

However, at the same time, Coleman has challenged 860 ballots and Franken has challenged 868 ballots. All of these have been temporarily removed from the counts.

When the recount is over, all of the challenged ballots will be reviewed by the canvassing board and decisions made.

One should assume that if a candidate challenges a ballot, it’s because it otherwise would have been interpreted in a way unfavorable to that candidate.

Therefore, whoever has the MOST challenges is likely to do WORSE with the challenged ballots. i.e., chances are that most of the Franken challenges will go to Coleman, and that most of the Coleman challenges will go to Franken.

Right now, having done all the math, I would rather be sitting in Coleman’s position than Franken’s. If trends hold, Coleman will end the recount with a lead of 25-75 votes (my over-under is 50), with most of the challenges having been made by Franken.

Since most challenges will have been made by Franken, the presumption mustt be that they will break for Coleman, unless Coleman has been challenging ballots on significantly more liberal and frivolous grounds than Franken.

This is unlikely, therefore Franken’s lead will probably not decrease.

I predict a Coleman win by 50 votes.

Also, the process seems to be running very fairly and smoothly, so let’s not behave like moonbats and truthers with their conspiracy theories. Let’s let these people do their jobs. Everyone is being watched closely and I expect a very fair result.


43 posted on 11/22/2008 2:22:10 PM PST by ex-Libertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lewisglad

Good lord. Why keep these stupid paper ballots. Even my supposedly backwards state of LA has a system where no identifying marks, stray lines or finger smudges can lead to “confusion” about a voters intent. Obviously there are too many dopes in MN who can’t figure out how to mark a “scan tron” ballot. Ours has a plastic covered paper overlay where you press the candidates name and a yellow X appears next to the name. then press the Cast Vote button and you’re done. Simple.


45 posted on 11/22/2008 2:37:59 PM PST by Round 9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lewisglad
Minnesota is the land of a thousand lakes, and a land of a thousand votes for a pig-faced, fat-headed, un-funny communist comedian.

Lots of luck, America. We'll need it.

52 posted on 11/22/2008 2:58:45 PM PST by IbJensen (Obombazombies have given America to the Communists!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lewisglad

I would be nice if recounts were illegal. It seems that a recount is more suspect than the tally reported on election day. The person ahead when the buzzer goes off wins. End of story.


60 posted on 11/22/2008 4:16:16 PM PST by ol painless (ol' painless is out of the bag)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lewisglad

It’s back up to + 180 for Coleman after Saturday’s work. The remaining counties look good for Coleman. I think he will still be ahead after the recount. Then they will fight over rejected absentee ballots and after that court battles.


78 posted on 11/23/2008 6:59:41 AM PST by Old Retired Army Guy (tHE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lewisglad
It's sad to think that the entire balance of our country could be hinging on this election!

Al Franken. A complete fraud, America hating, socialist.

BEYOND THE PALE!

81 posted on 11/23/2008 11:01:58 AM PST by unixfox (The 13th Amendment Abolished Slavery, The 16th Amendment Reinstated It !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AdmSmith; Berosus; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Fred Nerks; george76; ...
the figure doesn't include ballot challenges, which have caused vote tallies for both men to drop.

88 posted on 11/23/2008 2:55:11 PM PST by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/_______Profile finally updated Saturday, October 11, 2008 !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lewisglad
Is there a scenario where the Senate itself can essentially decide which candidate to seat? If so,Coleman should start making career plans today.
96 posted on 11/23/2008 6:24:38 PM PST by Gay State Conservative (Obama:"Ich bin ein beginner")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lewisglad
This is so true and funny
99 posted on 11/24/2008 12:52:24 AM PST by babubabu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lewisglad

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fb876zkE-eE


100 posted on 11/24/2008 12:53:16 AM PST by babubabu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson