One term is all he needs to store all our nations secrets.
Peggy Noonan wrote an article about Bill Clinton in his first year with almost exactly the same title. Let’s hope this guy has more insight than she did.
I guess it is all about Hope.
James Carville got it right when he said, “It’s the economy, stupid.” In two years we could see 8-10% unemployment and the repeal of the Bush tax cuts. I think then people will wise up.
That’s the best news I’ve heard in days. :)
Predictions about reelection before anybody takes office are foolish. Maybe he’ll be turned out as voters wake up to the dangers of this stupid leftist ideology. Maybe he, and his hand picked successors, will rule for decades on the votes of new immigrants and newly minted tax consumers.
Terms? If O gets his way there will be no such a thing.
One term is enough for the “One”. No more elections.
Marxist agendas do not include the option of being voted out of office.
Maybe he should start his first term before people start making assumptions about his last term. And all of this depends on fair and clean elections. Which I think are a thing of the past.
The clock is definitely ticking on Obama’s watch and the people will soon run out of patience.
It would appear that there is plenty of irrational exuberance to go around. Good grief, he hasn’t even taken office yet. Give it a rest for a few minutes.
Obama’s election is often compared to that of Ronald Reagan’s in 1980. Both gentlemen were voted in to fix an ailing economy. But the 1982 recession took a huge chunk out of the Gipper’s popularity. He had just a 35 percent job approval rating at the start of 1983
Yeah and Ronnie had a press doing it’s very best to make sure he didn’t get elected again, the opposite will hold true for Obama. It’s going to have to be VERY VERY bad for people to out this guy IMO.
One term??? Don’t be surprised if he’s impeached...
One term is more than enough time for lasting damage. 29 years later we have yet to see the worst result of the Iranian debacle.
One election at a time.
2010 and the House is the new front line. If Obama is nearly as unpopular as Biden predicts, the House should be all but in reach. Even if the GOP gets close, within 10 seats or so, there are enough moderate Dems that will fear their seats in ‘12 to put an end to the marxist regime. If 1994 is any example, the GOP should be able to fully close the deal and take back the House, with the right (and I do mean right) agenda.
2010 is the line in the sand. 2012 will take care of itself, in due time.
It matters most RIGHT NOW what candidates are being lined out to run in which races in 2010. We need strong candidates in all the marginal races and a new Contract with America.
I haven’t been a fan of Newt lately. But. Maybe he SHOULD be the RNC chief. At least he knew something about mobilizing a national agenda out of local races.
They said the same thing about Clinton. Not going down that road again.
You mean the swooning will stop in four years? And in the meantime, just how much damage will be done?
That will only happen if the opposition defines who he is, all I’ve seen are a bunch of Republican lemmings that play footsie with their enemies.