To: Just mythoughts
...kept the nominee from a complete trounce... Agreed she did that.
But on the other hand, it's sticking our head in the sand if we just refuse to examine both positive and negative information that becomes available.
Yes, this is a hit piece...but is there truth in it? I believe there very well could be some.
55 posted on
11/06/2008 9:42:15 PM PST by
Gondring
(Paul Revere would have been flamed as a naysayer troll and told to go back to Boston.)
To: Gondring
Listen to the radio interview with her today on another thread. You’ll know that these things were totally false.
60 posted on
11/06/2008 9:45:57 PM PST by
weston
To: Gondring
Agreed she did that. But on the other hand, it's sticking our head in the sand if we just refuse to examine both positive and negative information that becomes available. Yes, this is a hit piece...but is there truth in it? I believe there very well could be some.What you think these people never saw lord McCain in a bathrobe? I think there is a deliberate attempt to make her look common and more like white trash than to acknowledge the overwhelming positive she gave these sexist pigs.
64 posted on
11/06/2008 9:50:28 PM PST by
Just mythoughts
(Isa.3:4 And I will give children to be their princes, and babes shall rule over them.)
To: Gondring
Yes, this is a hit piece...but is there truth in it? I believe there very well could be some. Then let's wait for the audit, and a named source.
69 posted on
11/06/2008 9:54:40 PM PST by
FredZarguna
(And please, no more Vanities that are Goedel Sentences.)
To: Gondring
Yes, this is a hit piece...but is there truth in it? I believe there very well could be some. In Catholic ethics, we are supposed to give the accused the benefit of the doubt with regard to gossip. What ethical system are you operating under?
193 posted on
11/07/2008 11:02:52 AM PST by
Aquinasfan
(When you find "Sola Scriptura" in the Bible, let me know)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson