Skip to comments.
Mike Huckabee 2012
Canada Free Press ^
| 11/06/2008
| Yomin Postelnik
Posted on 11/06/2008 12:37:10 PM PST by Yomin Postelnik
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-138 next last
To: Yomin Postelnik
I’ll take Jindal Palin Hunter or JEB please. Or any combination thereof.
To: 1rudeboy
>>>we have a serious problem that needs to be examined.<<<<
Most people want to purge “the RINOs”, whom I contend are a minimal though bothersome problem.
The real problem is the substantial pollution of the conservative philosophy with social dicta and social goals that are inimical to our core principles.
42
posted on
11/06/2008 12:54:22 PM PST
by
angkor
(Conservatism is not a religious movement.)
To: Yomin Postelnik
Nope...he seems like a fine guy but, I thnk I’ll pass.
43
posted on
11/06/2008 12:54:28 PM PST
by
kimchi lover
(Joe the Plumber is my Homeboy!)
To: 1rudeboy
Bambi made his in roads because mccain was bambi light,and much better spoken,not to mention younger and more hip. Millions of conservatives stayed home. At least the polls said so.
44
posted on
11/06/2008 12:54:33 PM PST
by
libbylu
To: atlbelle44
Amen. I envisage Sarah and Jindal engaging in a super friendly primary and Sarah winning over Jindal and picking him as her running mate. Sarah will cover the conservatives. Jindal will be appealing to the minorities (Asians and Hispanics). There is a huge population in CA,NJ. We might even get those bluest states.
To: Yomin Postelnik
He was also instrumental in getting McInsane chosen for us as our nominee. Milk-toast spineless weasle and NOTHING MORE!!!
46
posted on
11/06/2008 12:54:40 PM PST
by
Camel Joe
(liberal=socialist=royalist/imperialist pawn=enemy of Freedom)
To: Yomin Postelnik
Um, no.
We need a fresh start. The most well known candidate we even need to consider is Palin, then we move to names few have heard of.
The old guard needs to move on, time for the younger crowd who grew up politically under Reagan....
47
posted on
11/06/2008 12:54:43 PM PST
by
ejonesie22
(Stupidity has an expiration date 11-4-2012)
To: Yomin Postelnik
Huckabee? Not just No. HELL F’ing NO!
‘Christian’ socialism. All the stupidity of socialism with a veneer of Christianity.
If you got mad when you were called a racist for opposing allowing anybody who could make it over the border a U.S. citizen, how about when Huckabee called you un-Christian for opposing social(ist) benefits for illegal aliens?
http://www.arkansasnews.com/archive/2005/01/28/News/316347.html
Gov. Mike Huckabee Thursday denounced a bill by Sen. Jim Holt that would deny state benefits to illegal immigrants as un-Christian, un-American, irresponsible and anti-life.
“I don't understand how a practicing Christian can turn his back on a child from this or any other state,” Huckabee said.
48
posted on
11/06/2008 12:55:27 PM PST
by
allmendream
(Wealth is EARNED not distributed.... so how could it be Redistributed?)
To: ravensandricks
But Romney was . . .
a Mormon.And he was pro-choice in an earlier life . . . meaning that McCain should win by default, but I'll vote for Obama anyway because I like his hair. /sarc
49
posted on
11/06/2008 12:56:56 PM PST
by
1rudeboy
To: Valpal1
Yup huckabee isn’t a fiscal conservative. He’s better off working for FOX at least he can’t do much damage there...
To: Yomin Postelnik
Imagine in 2012 a man who compared illegal immigration to slavery running against a black president. Huckabee’s crucifixion would truly be of biblical proportions, except without any moral high ground or redeeming qualities.
51
posted on
11/06/2008 12:58:48 PM PST
by
Pan_Yan
(All gray areas are fabrications.)
To: Yomin Postelnik
52
posted on
11/06/2008 12:58:55 PM PST
by
jtal
To: libbylu
Millions of conservatives stayed home. Which brings us to the conclusion that the "social" conservative vote doesn't mean squat.
53
posted on
11/06/2008 12:59:16 PM PST
by
1rudeboy
To: Yomin Postelnik
Mike Huckabee, for Court Jester maybe...
54
posted on
11/06/2008 1:00:24 PM PST
by
RatsDawg
(John McCain fought Communism in Vietnam, and now he is fighting Communist in America.)
To: perfect_rovian_storm
"Nope, sorry. No to the Huckster. Enough with all of those guys. No Rudy, no Romney, no Huck, no Fred, none of em. "
I agree!
Romney is too stuffy, and now has dissed Sarah through his subordinates; Rudy, I just don't trust a New York RINO, I thought Sean Hannity was going to pee down both legs everytime he talked about or got near Rudy;
Fred, I like Fred but he cowed down in the primary, I thought he fell asleep a couple of times in the debates;
Huckabee is a "TV Evangelist", and I don't think he has the fire to play dirty, and that's what it's going to take in America from this point forward, and the base doesn't want to be preached to.
Jindal - I'm not sold on him yet...the first time I saw him was last night, and he looked like a light weight to me. He talks pretty good, but then, so does obama.
I like the idea of putting Newt as the GOP Chief, maybe he can get some folks fired up in the party.
Right now, we need to be concentrating on the Senate races, we have plenty of time to worry about a President. I think obama's might not get his "expectations" adjusted and he might be a one termer.<
55
posted on
11/06/2008 1:00:47 PM PST
by
FrankR
(Let's sit back and watch the show - popcorn anyone?)
To: Yomin Postelnik
Huckaphony is a proven loser. We dont need retreads in 2012, we had enough losers in 2008.
To: Yomin Postelnik
NO, NO, NO!!! We don’t want any candidates that ran in the primary of 2008 — we want new candidates. Most of us didn’t like what we saw and don’t want a rerun!
Let’s get some new blood like Sarah Palin, Bobby Jindel, Mark Sanford, Tim Pawlenty and others to run.
NO McCain, Thompson, Giuliani, Huckabee, or Romney — we need new and fresh ideas that can energize Conservatives.
57
posted on
11/06/2008 1:02:09 PM PST
by
PhiKapMom
( BOOMER SOONER LetsGetThisRight.com)
To: Yomin Postelnik
58
posted on
11/06/2008 1:02:14 PM PST
by
engrpat
To: 1rudeboy
I have a few lefty acquaintances who told me in the days before the election that they believed absolutely that Romney lost primarily because the lunatic fringe of the Republican Party absolutely wouldn’t vote for a Mormon. I told them I really didn’t think that was the case, that his prior pro-abort stance and general vacuousness did him in more than anything. Having had a week or so to think about it and remembering some of the stuff that was posted here, I now think there may be something to it.
59
posted on
11/06/2008 1:02:46 PM PST
by
ravensandricks
(Jesus rides beside me. He never buys any smokes.)
To: pogo101
No thanks.Or rather: while Huck obviously would be better than Obama, I would strongly prefer another Republican choice.
***
There, fixed it.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-138 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson