Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Palin vs. McCain: Palin Insider Names Names
Regular Folks United ^ | November 6, 2008 | Kerri Houston Toloczko

Posted on 11/06/2008 10:45:00 AM PST by mbraynard

News has been circulating around GOP insiders for weeks that McCain campaign honchos Rick Davis and Steve Schmidt were planning to blame Sarah Palin for McCain’s loss. This was expected to be an effort to punt the blame for their own failures to the side of the ticket that was most popular with the base, attracted the largest rally crowds, and scared the living bejeepers out of the opposing party.

(Excerpt) Read more at regularfolksunited.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 11thcommandment; 2008; blame; mccain; palin; rickdavis; rinopurge; steveschmidt; waronsarah
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 541-560561-580581-600 ... 701-708 next last
To: WhistlingPastTheGraveyard

Ditto.

I didn’t think it was possible for McCain to get any of my hard earned money. He did only because of Palin.


561 posted on 11/07/2008 12:14:09 AM PST by DB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Publius6961

“Many explanations ... in numerous freeper threads.”

Can you provide any links? Would like to look.


562 posted on 11/07/2008 12:16:18 AM PST by gleeaikin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 418 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind
For instance, no one was uptight that McCain's wife showed up in a bathrobe on her daughter's blog with the media (apparently in a hotel room).

I suspect this is where they got the idea for the first Palin/robe story, then changed it to a towel later.

563 posted on 11/07/2008 12:18:39 AM PST by publana (Thank you, Sarah!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 335 | View Replies]

To: nutmeg; JulieRNR21; Joe Brower
History repeats itself. Once again, I must point out the similarities between the Sarah Palin smears, and the exact same smears that occurred from campaign staffers for Katherine Harris. My 2006 investigation of blabbering Katherine Harris' campaign staff turned up eye popping revelations.

One example: Chris Ingram, Harris' former campaign communications director has this photo on his Testimonials page.


Chris Ingram & Al Franken

If the Chris Ingram photo doesn't ruffle your feathers, perhaps the pattern of backstabbing GOP women by former Harris campaign staffer Glen Hodas will shine the light on a pervasive problem.

564 posted on 11/07/2008 12:29:15 AM PST by NautiNurse (Palin won more votes in her Wasilla Mayoral race than Biden got in his 2008 Pres run)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 401 | View Replies]

To: antceecee

I know what she said. I always feel anxious every time she talks. And she has this ‘I am a politician’ feel. Dodging questions, adding extra words to her answers, etc.

I don’t get this feeling when I listen to someone like laura ingraham. She is very straight and to the point.


565 posted on 11/07/2008 12:35:39 AM PST by ari-freedom (So this is how Liberty dies... with thunderous applause)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 560 | View Replies]

To: ari-freedom

You obviously don’t care for Palin and that is your right.
You think that the Couric interview is genuine. Okay.. good for you. But you just might want to hold a degree of skepticism for what you watch in the media... just sayin’.


566 posted on 11/07/2008 12:42:11 AM PST by antceecee (Palin '2012' Bless us Father.. have mercy on us and protect us from evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 565 | View Replies]

To: antceecee

I do care for Palin. She’s a very wonderful person with a good heart and accomplished a lot. She is a tough fighter and made tough decisions.

But we also need someone who can cut through the media and I don’t think she can do that yet.
It’s not just the Couric interview but even the Hannity interview.


567 posted on 11/07/2008 1:11:31 AM PST by ari-freedom (So this is how Liberty dies... with thunderous applause)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 566 | View Replies]

To: Syncro
McCain hardly gave Palin the time of day when she was running with him. He muzzled her from speaking of the things from a conservative point of view which would have been his only chance of winning. He gave the election to Obama.

Get it through your head, Bush gave the election to Obama 5 weeks before it concluded!

568 posted on 11/07/2008 3:14:49 AM PST by meandog (Wasilla warrior in 2012!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 528 | View Replies]

To: nralife

My apologies nralife....I misunderstood your point. I should have said that Rush believed someone was spreading rumors. Thanks for the correction.


569 posted on 11/07/2008 3:18:52 AM PST by txlurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 519 | View Replies]

To: redk

You’re right redk. I misunderstood nralife.


570 posted on 11/07/2008 3:23:39 AM PST by txlurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 388 | View Replies]

To: ari-freedom

“think mccain would’ve fought to keep the bush tax cuts from automatically expiring when he voted against them in the first place?”

He *never* got close to making the obvious point of a tax increase when the cuts expire - Which leaves me to believe he was going to let the expire *just like Obama*.

He had no intention of winning this election. The way it is now, our elections are a farce. George H.W. Bush’s pet project, the New World Order. That’s how it seems to me.


571 posted on 11/07/2008 3:27:58 AM PST by Bluebird Singing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 554 | View Replies]

To: mbraynard

Maybe they are trying to preserve John McCain’s reputation just in case he decides to run again in 2012. LOL.


572 posted on 11/07/2008 3:28:46 AM PST by kempster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: redgirlinabluestate

Nicolle Wallace was apparently the person who kept Palin from doing more media interviews. This reminds me of my fustration at Bush refusing to fight back and let the media tear Bush apart with no response. Bush for years were likea punching bag. Maybe Nicolle Wallace is the reason?

http://minx.cc/?blog=86&post=277539


573 posted on 11/07/2008 4:02:12 AM PST by 4rcane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: mbraynard

McCain and the GOP lost for several reasons, but NONE of them was due to Sarah Palin. She injected life into his lukewarm campaign.


574 posted on 11/07/2008 4:24:05 AM PST by Sender (Never lose your ignorance; you can never regain it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kempster

They made a good point on Fox&Friends just a minute ago - blaming the republican party for trashing Sarah who is trying to decide who they are - Sarah, McCain or Powell - Although it was a democrap that said it - I think it about sums it up. I think we all agree on the answer - if not, then we need to start a Conservative party with all the conservative values and a theme of “Personal Responsibility” - when Sarah said personal responsibility, the Luntz meter hit record levels - but, of course, you never heard it again.

Anyone can do anything they want to as long as they can afford to pay for it.

35 years ago when working 20/7 trying to start a small business I saw the union workers picketing for more money than EEs made. I said when the minority becomes the majority, we’ll all be in trouble - and here we are. (This is due to the fact that responsible tax-paying citizens generally have 1 to 2 childred because that’s all they can afford - while the welfare case have the number that the welfare system will pay for. When I graduated from college and got a great job in 1959, I discovered that had I spent the previous 4 years having illegitimate kids, I’d have been making 50% more.

The “Country First” should have been “McCain First” - had it been country first, he would have swallowed his pride and gone after Rev Wright, changed his public financing, etc..


575 posted on 11/07/2008 4:46:32 AM PST by GretchenB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 572 | View Replies]

To: Night Hides Not

Cock-uh-roaches.


576 posted on 11/07/2008 5:14:27 AM PST by ecomcon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Leo Farnsworth

Romney is our version of the rebel Catholic Democrats. Pro choice Mormon. How does that work?

No more liberal republicans. Purge them and rename the party Conservative.


577 posted on 11/07/2008 5:25:32 AM PST by ecomcon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: nutmeg

Did you happen to catch Greta last night positively livid with the treatment Sarah is receiving? She was on fire.


578 posted on 11/07/2008 5:27:10 AM PST by StarFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 401 | View Replies]

To: ari-freedom

If Alaska taxes remain low, and if wages and prices remain flexible and free, and if private property continues to be respected, there’s no doubt that Alaska will continue to prosper during the next five years. Depressions are governmentally induced from recessions when meddlesome controls are put in place. The vindication will be if Sarah believes enough in her own principles and policies to stick with them as the rest of the country goes down the toilet.

Not sure why Katie Couric should be the deciding factor. She’s a lefty viper, out to make anyone on the right look bad. She’s also still responsible for low ratings of her own news show (to which legitimate charge she cried “that’s sexism!”). I think the next viable conservative candidate should b**ch-slap her by simply avoiding her entirely. Sarah would have been much better off avoiding these sorts of interviews and reaching out to the press and the urban demographic through many small press conferences in which she could control the discourse and also be herself. When she’s herself, urbans respond positively to her (everyone does).

I believe her poor performance with Gibson and Couric were mainly the result of receiving mixed directives from Team McCain, putting her in the position of having to mentally run through the sorts of responses that were “legal” and making her look on camera as if she were slow and indecisive. Her leadership history in Alaska prove otherwise.

I don’t think the New Conservative Movement can dispense with alternative media, nor can it appease the old media. Part of pushing the agenda of freedom is that we must expose the MSM for what it is — an entrenched institution of propaganda for the left.


579 posted on 11/07/2008 5:41:18 AM PST by GoodDay (McCain-Palin '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 559 | View Replies]

To: GoodDay

Palin/Thune 2012!


580 posted on 11/07/2008 5:46:53 AM PST by petercooper (I am a bitter clinger!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 579 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 541-560561-580581-600 ... 701-708 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson