Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Democrats Splitting Heavily for McCain
Say Anything Blog ^ | 30 Oct 2008 | Bob King

Posted on 10/30/2008 5:33:27 PM PDT by subbob

The Democrats in key swing states are splitting for McCain in big numbers. This effect has either not been noted, or has been ignored, by most pundits.

Democrats are beaming that their party is outperforming the Republicans in early voting, releasing numbers Wednesday that show registrants of their party ahead 54 percent to 30 percent among the 1.4 million voters who have gone to the polls early.
Poll gives McCain lead in Florida early voting

Yet, a poll of early voters in Florida provides a curious anomaly.

A Los Angeles Times/Bloomberg poll gave McCain a 49-45 lead over Democrat Barack Obama among Floridians who have already voted.

Then we have all the Hillary Democrats, at sites like HillBuzz, reporting on potential McCain victories in Pennsylvania, Florida, Iowa, New Hampshire and even Maine!

In Pennsylvania, Democrats hard at work not just voting, but campaigning for McCain!

DEMOCRATS are staffing McCain offices across the state. DEMOCRATS are phone banking and canvassing for McCain. DEMOCRATS are raising large sums to fund this last week of campaigning.
HillBuzz on Pennsylvania

As mentioned above, key indicators that Democrats in Florida are voting for McCain.

analysis indicates Democrats voting early in Florida are voting for John McCain in huge numbers
HillBuzz on Florida

Disenfranchised Hillary Democrats in Iowa, New Hampshire and Maine also shifting to McCain.

And all of us agree that on election night, the media will be spinning and sputtering and trying to explain things that those of us on the ground have seen coming for months now.
HillBuzz on New Hampshire, Iowa and Maine



TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2008; crossovervote; demsformccain; election; iowa; maine; mccain; newhampshire; politics; president
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-104 next last
To: subbob
It's too early to get my hopes up too much, but the 0bama effect has overtaken Barry's chances to hang onto traditional demonrat voting blocks.

I find it hard to believe that people who are close to retirement or have retired would vote for 0bama after the hit they've taken in the market and after hearing what he might do to their retirement. They are not likely to care for his plan to nationalize health care and add however many millions of new patients with no new Dr.s or nurses.

I find it equally hard to believe that Jewish voters who have any affection whatsoever for Israel would vote for 0bama given his ties to and support from those who advocate the destruction of Israel and Jews world wide.

Then there are the women who are unlikely to appreciate his poor treatment of and disrespect to Hillary. If they had been on the fence, then the treatment Sarah Palin and her family, especially her daughters should close the deal for them.

There are many others who fall outside the more traditional democrat voting blocks who see themselves getting shafted when the Bush tax cuts expire. I still have hope that even the mind numbed will come to their senses in the privacy of the voting booth. Not all, of course, but hopefully enough.

81 posted on 10/30/2008 7:07:02 PM PDT by GBA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: techno
Sorry guys, Sarah Palin has nothing to do with making us Pumas happy. We were voting for McCain before Palin was even a thought. Palin is not Hillary Clinton and can't be a substitute for her. That said, we respect Palin for all that she has accomplished, we will defend her against the rampant sexism that we see and that was also used to crucify Hillary Clinton. We are Clinton Dems. We firmly believe that Hillary was and still is the best candidate for this country. But we also respect John McCain. Sarah Palin is not what brought us to McCain's side, although I know that makes a good story. We honestly feel that among the two candidates we have to choose from, that McCain is the better for the country. This isn't a game to us. This isn't some kind of get even, vote for the woman, or mud in your eye competition. We have seen Obama’s handiwork up close and personal during the primaries. And we don't like it, we don't like him, we don't trust him, and we don't believe a single thing he has to say about anything. As a side note, we haven't forgotten the Republican’s hand in all of this. It was your Operation Chaos, Be a Democrat for a Day during the primaries voting for Obama to try and kill Hillary's chances that have now brought you to the threshold of an Obama presidency. You are now reaping the seeds that you have sewed.
82 posted on 10/30/2008 7:08:05 PM PDT by jdona
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: subbob
These guys didn't have polls, lost everything they had, but believed in a better life...FREEDOOM!!!!Photobucket
83 posted on 10/30/2008 7:13:00 PM PDT by ladyvet (WOLVERINES!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: subbob
These guys didn't have polls, lost everything they had, but believed in a better life...FREEDOOM!!!!Photobucket
84 posted on 10/30/2008 7:13:09 PM PDT by ladyvet (WOLVERINES!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pburgh01

I hope Ras finds himself another line of work, because he,the Zogster, and Gallup will find their creds in the toilet after being in the tank for BHO.


85 posted on 10/30/2008 7:16:56 PM PDT by princeofdarkness (Ronald Reagan- "Trust But Verify" MSM- "Report, Lie, Then Crucify")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: bitt

Comment of the week!


86 posted on 10/30/2008 7:17:58 PM PDT by ROTB (Our Constitution [is] for a [Christian] people. It is wholly inadequate [for] any other. -John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: jdona
As a side note, we haven't forgotten the Republican’s hand in all of this. It was your Operation Chaos, Be a Democrat for a Day during the primaries voting for Obama to try and kill Hillary's chances that have now brought you to the threshold of an Obama presidency.

You have this completely backwards.

Operation Chaos was designed to bloody up Obama, by encouraging Republicans to vote for Hillary. The point was that McCain wanted to appear (at the time) "above the fray" and not actually attack the opposition - so conservatives had to keep Hillary in the race so that Hillary and Obama would cut each other down.

Seeing how Obama was winning all the Caucuses, that meant that Operation Chaos operatives had to prop up Hillary in the primaries. That's right, we came to Hillary's rescue, if only for our own purposes.

Don't believe me? Check out the Rush Limbaugh site yourself.

87 posted on 10/30/2008 7:21:28 PM PDT by Yossarian (Everyday, somewhere on the globe, somebody is pushing the frontier of stupidity...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: subbob

Well, McCain is the candidate the Democrats selected for us, so it’s logical.


88 posted on 10/30/2008 7:23:49 PM PDT by Uncle Miltie (Bushonomics: Privatize Gains, Socialize Losses......."PAULSON'S THEFT")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jdona
“It was your Operation Chaos, Be a Democrat for a Day during the primaries voting for Obama to try and kill Hillary's chances that have now brought you to the threshold of an Obama presidency.”-jdona

You have it wrong about Operation Chaos. It was to get the GOP to cross over and vote for Hillary in states like PA, Ohio, and Texas to keep her in the game. The object was to keep the Democrat primary going. After Obamas string of early victories, we didn't want him wrapping up the nomination early and get all those extra months of MSM adulation and uniting the party 8 months before the election. If that had happened, McCain would be toast. At first a lot of us didn't care who won, we just wanted the fight to drag on. But when we realized how bad Obama was it changed my mind. At that point I would think many of us were rooting for your girl to win the nomination, not the election, just nomination.

89 posted on 10/30/2008 7:29:52 PM PDT by skully (If Obama gets elected will we need to say Obama bless you when someone sneezes??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: jdona

Hmmm, so many questions and you signed up today. We, as Republicans, are doing our best to publicize the fact that Obama is a Socialist, has terrorist friends and will negotiate with terrorist countries without preconditions, etc. We have to fight against the MSM ignoring all of these issues time and time again. You, as a Democrat, have enjoyed the press bias until now, welcome to our world.

Colin Powell is a Democrat pretending to be a Republican (RINO). You would probably like him if you read his autobiography. I thank him for his service to our country, but I wrote him off as a serious contender years ago.

I do not work for the McCain campaign, but I agree ads should be stronger, yet they are not. The whole Palin fracas I call BS. True or not, Palin should stick to her guns (pun intended) and continue with her message (I support the 2nd amendment completely, BTW).

I know it is in your best interest to vote for McCain rather than Obama, if not, sit the vote out.


90 posted on 10/30/2008 7:31:48 PM PDT by RepublicanChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: VigilantAmerican

Dare we hope?

Time is growing short. I am praying.


91 posted on 10/30/2008 7:31:51 PM PDT by jacquej
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jdona

I am not sure how to respond to your post, actually.

But, I did notice that you say you despise the NRA. I do not know where you live, and that might be why you do not understand why some of us need to have a gun.

My husband and I are both elderly and disabled, and live in a rural area. It would take the local police at least 15 to 20 minutes to get to us if we called 911. We have a rifle and ammo, but I would really feel safer if we had a shotgun, because I am not sure I could hit an intruder with a rifle.

And, it is entirely possible that one could come our ways, for reasons I do not want to explain on a public forum.

We keep it in our bedroom closet, and hope we never have to use it. But, we do have a quick frontline defense to give us time to get it out and load it.

Two wonderful Belgian Malinois dogs, who will defend us with their lives, and we so hope it never comes to that, for we love them dearly. We do not belong to the NRA, but we appreciate them, for they stand up for our right to defend ourselves and our property.

You must realize that the police can’t do it all alone, be everywhere at once. We need to be able to defend ourselves in am emergency, even if we do not want the job.


92 posted on 10/30/2008 7:49:30 PM PDT by jacquej
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: mund1011

I live in an Atlanta suburb, but feel pretty secure. I am within 2 miles of the city police station, the county sheriff’s office, AND the county police station. :) I think the highway patrol might even be here. Heehehee


93 posted on 10/30/2008 7:56:21 PM PDT by Politicalmom (President McCain: "Ok, Ted, I want your list of supreme court nominees on my desk by Monday.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: jdona

I think I’ll just say welcome to FR, and enjoy your stay.

OK, I lied, one more thing: The right to keep and bear arms must NEVER be taken away from this great country’s citizenry.


94 posted on 10/30/2008 8:08:03 PM PDT by Theresawithanh (I've got the fevah! McCain/Palin 2008!!! I AM JOE! I'll bet you are, too!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: jdona
Welcome to Free Republic. I think the reason that the GOP has not gone after Obama harder is because we don't want to be labeled rascist. But, no matter how careful we are, we are called rascist, simply because the Obamanoids think in only those terms.

By now you know that Operation Chaos has kept Hillary in the race longer. You also know that none of us are that impressed with McCain. He's not conservative enough for us. But he will not destroy the very foundation of this country like Obama would.

As far as November 4th, we are so very glad for every ally we have. I am actively talking to people every day and I've heard this sentence many times now: "I've been a life-long Democrat, but I will vote AGAINST Obama, cause Obama scares me."

And my attitude toward those Democrats has softened. They are putting country over Party, and I can respect that. Even my own family who is fiercely Democrat and who at first had chosen Obama, changed their minds after "Joe The Plumber". :)

I hope on Nov. 5th we can all breathe a sigh of relief if (and I want to say WHEN) McCain has won. I hope that Obama's followers won't torch the country like Odinga's followers did after Odinga lost in Kenya.

BTW: I lurk at PUMA sometimes and it's been refreshing that for once we're talking the same language.

95 posted on 10/30/2008 8:12:55 PM PDT by CaraM (Faithless is he who quits when the road darkens.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: Hildy

*blushes* To all of those that pointed it out before a Mod apparently fixed it, sorry about messing up the headline. Thanks for pointing out the mistake, and more thanks to whoever fixed it.

I did preview it before posting, but apparently not well enough.


96 posted on 10/30/2008 8:17:32 PM PDT by subbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: subbob

We need to refrain from any and all vituperative and insulting commentary about Democrats (except for Obama-Marxists, of course) until further notice (the PUMAs could help us even after the election).


97 posted on 10/30/2008 8:32:39 PM PDT by steve86 (Acerbic by nature, not nurture™)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gotribe

“I don’t put much stock in the puma claims. They’re beyond emotional about O’Bomber. We shall see.”

Yeah but. Their votes are just marks on a sheet of paper, they do not retain the emotion behind them. I’m a stock trader, so please consider this example from my universe; which has nothing to do with electoral “voting” but OTOH has EVERYTHING to do with a different type of voting.

One party sells a stock because he thinks it’s done rising and wants to redeploy $$ elsewhere. Another party sells a stock because he can’t stand the pain seeing of it going down in price any further. Another party sells a stock because they need the money for an entirely differnt purpose. Another party buys a stock because he thinks it will rise in price. Another party sees the stock coughed up by the capitulating owner and cannot resist the bargain. Another party buys a stock because he sees the parking lot full of cars or he got great service using their product. And every one of those decisions can be right or wrong or both in the next 5 minutes or the next 6 months or the next 5 years. Every one of those individual decisions at the moment they are made influences the “price” of the stock. The stock market is continuous, generally. The election is obviously a one-time event in time.

The votes cast by the PUMAs individually and collectively do not bear the motivation(s) behind them. The vote cast by a hardened Dem for a Republican in clumsy error does not differ from a vote studiously cast by the purest Conservative alive.

Ergo, I believe we should welcome the PUMAs and welcome their disgust at their treatment by 0bamas’ thugs because the struggle at this point, in an election where not that many of us are all that thrilled with McCain, is to defeat the enemy, 0bama. We have common cause. After that war is won, if it CAN be won, we can engage in niceties and shades of meaning.

Respectfully,


98 posted on 10/30/2008 8:41:59 PM PDT by Attention Surplus Disorder (Tired from wondering whether we wake up in the newest socialist country tomorrow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: pburgh01

Great information! And don’t think Hussein and his minions don’t know this.


99 posted on 10/30/2008 9:42:09 PM PDT by rashley (Rashley)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: jdona

You make great points. I have to hand to you guys, you know how to play hardball. Even the Swift Boat ads were done independently of the Bush campaign.

This leads me to ask... With so much there, why didn’t the Clintons take this guy out?

I am assuming you’re really a PUMA. If you are, thank you for your efforts. Many of us aren’t crazy about McCain either, for reasons I would presume are far different from yours, but I hope you will vote for him. You can have your crack at him in ‘12.


100 posted on 10/30/2008 9:52:34 PM PDT by rashley (Rashley)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-104 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson