Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 10/28/2008 5:54:24 AM PDT by rabscuttle385
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last
To: rabscuttle385

Repackaged? Like Algore on Rolling Stone?........


2 posted on 10/28/2008 5:56:56 AM PDT by Red Badger (My wallet is made out of depleted you-owe-mium........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rabscuttle385

Salt Lake City/Romney ping.


3 posted on 10/28/2008 5:57:10 AM PDT by napscoordinator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rabscuttle385

4 posted on 10/28/2008 5:57:41 AM PDT by Red Badger (My wallet is made out of depleted you-owe-mium........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rabscuttle385

The problem with Mitt this time in the eyes of many folks, myself included, was that he seemed to be someone who took whatever positions were the most politically expedient. When running in Mass he was pro gay, anti-gun, and pro the right to abort. He switched on those and other fundamental issues when he decided to run for President. I don’t buy that the conversion was genuine given the timing. I think he is a man that will say and do anything to get elected.


5 posted on 10/28/2008 5:57:43 AM PDT by DemonDeac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rabscuttle385

Nicht. No more “repackaged” candidates.

No more “I must hurry to find where my people are headed so I can lead them” politicians.

Core values are core values and do not need to be “repackaged.

Romney will never be nationally elected.


6 posted on 10/28/2008 5:57:48 AM PDT by silverleaf (Fasten your seat belts- it's going to be a BUMPY ride.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rabscuttle385

Perhaps repackaged as Governor Palin’s VP candidate.


7 posted on 10/28/2008 5:58:10 AM PDT by wideawake (Why is it that those who like to be called Constitutionalists know the least about the Constitution?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rabscuttle385

Baloney. There was remarkably little enthusiasm for Romney among the GOP in general and especially from conservatives.

This was not necessarily fair, as he’s probably a great guy, but he just doesn’t flip many switches.

The nominee in 2012 will either be Sarah or a new face. None of the 2008 nomination contenders will be in the running.

IMNTBHO.


8 posted on 10/28/2008 5:58:52 AM PDT by Sherman Logan (Everyone has a right to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rabscuttle385

Nah, if 0bama win, the standard bearer of Republican and conservative in 2012 will not be a white man Mitt Romney. The person will be either a white female Sarah Palin, or an Indian-American man Bobby Jindal.


9 posted on 10/28/2008 5:59:18 AM PDT by paudio (0bama is a Marxist who lied to get elected. If he is elected, we will see a different 0bama..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rabscuttle385

If Obama wins, this country won’t make it to 2012.


11 posted on 10/28/2008 5:59:45 AM PDT by Sig Sauer P220 (Thanks to the robber barons in D.C. and on Wall St. I've been forced to become a minimalist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rabscuttle385
These shills are just trying to garner a few more Øbama votes from would-be Romney supporters - vote for Øbama now, you could get Romney in 2012.

Nothing could be furthur from the truth: A vote for the Øne now, emboldens the FAR left to continue what they've been doing too well: pick-n-choose who runs this country. Unless Romney moves FAR left to meet them, he would have NO chance.

12 posted on 10/28/2008 6:00:28 AM PDT by C210N (The television has mounted the most serious assault on Republicanism since Das Kapital.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rabscuttle385

Mitt Romney (to whose campaign this poster donated), has exactly one week to get in front of a camera and CLEARLY TELL HIS SUPPOORTERS to go support:

Sarah Palin.

Otherwise, Mitt will not have supporters in 2012.


14 posted on 10/28/2008 6:02:14 AM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network (CHEVY VOLT COUNTDOWN: V minus 86 Weeks. Waiting...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: greyfoxx39; Pan_Yans Wife; MHGinTN; Colofornian; Elsie; FastCoyote; Osage Orange; Greg F; ...

Flying Inman Alert


16 posted on 10/28/2008 6:05:04 AM PDT by colorcountry (To anger a conservative, lie to him. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rabscuttle385
Romney could be well positioned to rise as a leader of the Republican Party to guide conservatives through a few years in the political wilderness and a favorite for the GOP presidential nomination come 2012.

Let's focus on defeating "Barack The Wealth Spreader" and the MSM for the next 7 days. We'll have plenty of time to chart our course if McCain-Palin doesn't win.

17 posted on 10/28/2008 6:05:32 AM PDT by McGruff (She's not just a pretty face. She's the one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rabscuttle385
Repackaged....

That's the problem here - "packaging" instead of being. The cult of personality has invaded the Republican party just as it has the democrats. How about, instead of "packaging" a candidate, they present a few real people? Example: Sarah Palin is real, and doesn't need "packaging". Barry Obama is a defective communist and they're trying to cover this up with "packaging".

Too much marketing in politics, not enough product.

18 posted on 10/28/2008 6:05:53 AM PDT by meyer (The second amendment is NOT about hunting)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rabscuttle385

Not my choice, not then, not now, not in the future.


19 posted on 10/28/2008 6:07:17 AM PDT by Carley (The media understands credentials but does NOT understand principles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rabscuttle385

21 posted on 10/28/2008 6:08:05 AM PDT by workerbee (If you vote for Democrats, you are engaging in UnAmerican Activity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rabscuttle385

God forbid but I believe Jindahl will play Reagan to Obama’s Carter.

Palin is a sensation but Jindahl would clean Obama’s clock in the debates and would be able to criticize Obama without it being called “racism.” We saw it with hilary: even a woman can’t criticize a black man.

Jindahl can simply because his skin is dark. And yes he is indian, but black people think Obama is black and he is in fact white and arab mostly.


22 posted on 10/28/2008 6:09:05 AM PDT by DiogenesLaertius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rabscuttle385
If Obama wins, it will be, in part, because of the venal, coveting, Romney
who directed his people to destroy Gov Palin and her beautiful family for MythRomney.

"You will embrace this rebellion. Support it, from our lands in
the north. I will gain English favor by condemning it and
ordering it opposed from our lands in the south. Whichever way
the tide runs, we will rise."

23 posted on 10/28/2008 6:09:17 AM PDT by Diogenesis (Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rabscuttle385
Palin / Hunter 2012
24 posted on 10/28/2008 6:09:25 AM PDT by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rabscuttle385
NO! ENOUGH ALREADY

I would craw on broken glass to vote for Palin/Jindal. By 2012 the experience question would no longer be a arguing point for the Dems.

26 posted on 10/28/2008 6:10:16 AM PDT by NavyCanDo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson