[Danae]

I guess he is going to skip right over the thrid Circuit.

He is going to ask the SCOTUS to change the law in essence. To make it possible for the average person to question the qualifications of a candidate for President. This is either a Pandora's Box, or a chance for the average Man to have a say with just cause to do so.

[BallyBill]

Stop The Insanity!

[mnehring]

Maybe the judge dismissing it on the grounds he did will turn out to be a good thing, the USSC would be higher profile, Obama can’t appeal higher, and they would have a vested interest in the Constitutional aspect. There are also enough Conservatives sitting, if there is something to this, it has a chance of being heard.

[Jeff Head]

GO BERG GO! Expose the charlatain!

---

YES TO MCCAIN-PALIN '08 FOR AMERICA





SARAH PALIN DRAWING HUGE CROWDS ALL ACROSS AMERICA

---

http://www.jeffhead.com/joeplumber.htm

[Retired Greyhound]

How could this judge say that a US Citizen has no standing about his president?

[Bigh4u2]

“He is going to ask the SCOTUS to change the law in essence.”

Change what law??

“To make it possible for the average person to question the qualifications of a candidate for President”

The President of the United States represents the PEOPLE.

So why wouldn’t the People have standing to bring the suit?

Either individually or collectively..

[TommyDale]

"He is going to ask the SCOTUS to change the law in essence."

Actually he is merely asking that they require a potential future President of the United States to prove that he is legally qualified. Is that asking too much?

[RoseofTexas]

The SC will slap him down like they did Ohio and fraudulent ballot ruling! I think the bigger case is the Judge who threw out the case has donated and supports OsAMA! He needed to go to a friendly court judge instead he walked into the lions den!

[ncfool]

This stinks of conflict of interest. Please post on every blog on the net and get to Phil Berg.

PLEASE POST TO ALL BLOGS http://www.sidley.com/ourpeople/Detail.aspx?attorney=1069

[nhwingut]

This could be big news. Drudge is running lower court rejection. He is sure to pick up SCOTUS appeal.

If anything, it puts doubt into play.

[lovesdogs]

While I do not agree with Berg’s “truther” stuff. Politics have made the strangest bedfellows ever in this election.

If he can expose and (Lord help us all) correct a deficiency in the Constitution that has no mechanism to insure that those running for the highest office in the land actually meet the requirements it sets forth, may God bless him.

We have apparently been sitting on this landmine for over 200 years and spared only because decent people respected what the law said. Now we have this man who is not decent and we need to stop him. If you will excuse me...by any lawful means necessary.

[Chuck N]

Why shouldn’t Berg be able to ask the question, “Can you show us your birth certificate?” What’s so wrong about that and why does a judge appointed by Bill Clinton say he doesn’t have the authority to ask? Who does then? What caste level in our society can ask such an exalted question of the shiester “lord barrack...”...I guess only a democratic judge when it’s about the citizenship of a republican candidate....we’re headed towards fascism...if this thug wins, we all lose big time....

[ConservativeMind]

What entity is otherwise responsible for this inquiry?

[expatpat]

It seems to me that the only person who can claim injury, and thus standing, at this point is:

Hillary Clinton.

[Portrait of a Lady]

Obama’s Birth Certificate Judge-Obama Linkage

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2115270/posts

[HEY4QDEMS]

What happened to ‘...Government of the people, by the people, for the people,...’ Abraham Lincoln in his Gettysburg Address 1863.

A great quote indeed, but the G. A. is not a corollary to the Constitution and thus has no judicial weight.

It's kinda like citing the Golden Rule as an extension of the Ten Commandments.

[LucyT]

Philip J. Berg is Appealing to the U.S. Supreme Court

Ping.

[LucyT]

Ping.

[MarkL]

If his suit was thrown out based on his not having legal standing, who DOES have standing to question a candidate's eligibility? Is it only those who have constitutional rights to cast the votes? So it would be any registered voter for house or senate seats, and only certified state electors for the president?

Mark

[eyedigress]

Good. This seems to be an area the SCOTUS can address without making any new law. Force Barry or the Hawaii Health department to show it.

[Texas4ever]

I will stinken donate!!!!

Awesome video of report grilling Biden!!!!

FINALLY!!!