Philip J. Berg is Appealing to the U.S. Supreme Court

ObamaCrimes.com Phillip Berg ^ | 10/25/2008 | Phillip j. Berg

[Danae]

Obama is "NOT" qualified to be President of the United States Lawsuit Against Obama Dismissed from Philadelphia Federal Court

For Immediate Release: - 10/25/08 - Contact Info at end. UPDATE: Ruling attached at end. It's a really poor copy, but it is all we have for the moment. Willl put up a better copy when we get one.

(Lafayette Hill, Pennsylvania – 10/25/08) - Philip J. Berg, Esquire, the Attorney who filed suit against Barack H. Obama challenging Senator Obama’s lack of “qualifications” to serve as President of the United States, announced today that he is immediately appealing the dismissal of his case to the United States Supreme Court. The case is Berg v. Obama, No. 08-cv-04083.

Berg said, "I am totally disappointed by Judge Surrick's decision and, for all citizens of the United States, I am immediately appealing to the U.S. Supreme Court.

This is a question of who has standing to uphold our Constitution. If I don't have standing, if you don't have standing, if your neighbor doesn't have standing to question the eligibility of an individual to be President of the United States - the Commander-in-Chief, the most powerful person in the world - then who does?

So, anyone can just claim to be eligible for congress or the presidency without having their legal status, age or citizenship questioned.

According to Judge Surrick, we the people have no right to police the eligibility requirements under the U.S. Constitution.

What happened to ‘...Government of the people, by the people, for the people,...’ Abraham Lincoln in his Gettysburg Address 1863.

We must legally prevent Obama, the unqualified candidate, from taking the Office of the Presidency of the United States,” Berg said.

Our website obamacrimes.com now has 71.8 + million hits. We are urging all to spread the word of our website – and forward to your local newspapers and radio and TV stations.

Berg again stressed his position regarding the urgency of this case as, “we” the people, are heading to a “Constitutional Crisis” if this case is not resolved forthwith.

* * For copies of all Court Pleadings, go to obamacrimes.com

# # #

Philip J. Berg, Esquire 555 Andorra Glen Court, Suite 12 Lafayette Hill, PA 19444-2531 Cell (610) 662-3005 (610) 825-3134 (800) 993-PHIL [7445] Fax (610) 834-7659 philjberg@obamacrimes.comThis e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it

[cruise_missile]

Email the following links to:
(just copy and paste)

L.A. Times sits on video of Obama toasting radical Jew-basher
http://michellemalkin.com/2008/10/25/la-times-sits-on-video-of-obama-toasting-radical-jew-basher/

Google: Obama Jew hating (288,000 hits)
http://www.google.com/search?q=obama+jew+hating&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a

phil.griffin@nbc.com, steve.capus@nbc.com, Steve.Capus@nbcuni.com, gary.sheffer@ge.com, renata.hopkins@ge.com, lisa.lanspery@ge.com, brian.williams@msnbc.com, chris.matthews@msnbc.com, countdown@msnbc.com, hardball@msnbc.com, Today@NBC.com, viewerservices@msnbc.com, nightly@nbc.com, World@MSNBC.com, Dateline@NBC.com, world@msnbc.com, atc@npr.org, morning@npr.org, Letters@msnbc.com, totn@npr.org, newshour@pbs.org, joe@msnbc.com, abrams@msnbc.com, byork@nationalreview.com, comments@mclaughlin.com, ElRushbo@eibnet.com, evening@cbsnews.com, Foxreport@foxnews.com, gretawire@fox.com, Hannity@foxnews.com, hemmer@foxnews.com, hume@foxnews.com, ElRushbo@eibnet.com, me@glennbeck.com,oreilly@foxnews.com,Joe@msnbc.com, letters@charleskrauthammer.com, lindamuller@buchanan.org,me@glennbeck.com,netaudr@abc.com, Ontherecord@foxnews.com, oreilly@foxnews.com, race08@msnbc.com, Special@foxnews.com, stu@glennbeck.com, ureport@foxnews.com, weekendlive@foxnews.com, LouDobbs@cnn.com, jake.tapper@abc.com, 360@cnn.com, a.latour@wsj.com, a.murray@wsj.com, am@cnn.com, amhotshots@cnn.com, caffertyfile@cnn.com, campbellbrown@cnn.com, cnn.feedback@cnn.com, cnn.onair@cnn.com, cnn@cnn.com, crossfire@cnn.com, darren.mcdermott@wsj.com, daybreak@cnn.com, elrushbo@eibnet.com, foxreport@foxnews.com, hannity@foxnews.com, headlinenews@cnn.com, insidepoliticts@cnn.com, inthemoney@cnn.com, j.fry@wsj.com, jeff.greenfield@cnn.com, je@msnbc.com, dlow@cnbc.com, late.edition@cnn.com, letters@msnbc.com, live@cnn.com, livefrom@cnn.com, livetoday@cnn.com, lookingout@cnn.com, loudobbs@cnn.com, moneyline@cnn.com, newsnight@cnn.com, newstips@cnn.com, paulazahn@cnn.com, podcast@cnn.com, primenews@cnn.com, question@cnn.com, special@foxnews.com, t.cullen@wsj.com, tina.cowles@cnn.com, tom.hannon@cnn.com, wam@cnn.com, wolf@cnn.com, wsj.ltrs@wsj.com

[Terry Mross]

That’s what I mean. If you ask a question the power doesn’t like, you’re shut down. If this isn’t facist I don’t know what is.

These idiots who vote for o and b will have to come to us one day asking for help. If we can survive underground. Scary times we live in.

[Pelagius of Asturias]

The legal implications of Obama being sworn in and later being shown to be ineligible for the office are very serious. Every military directive he issues can be questioned; every bill he signs and very Executive Order will be unenforcable.

This question needs to be resolved before inauguration if The One is elected.

Will the courts place the Constitution above any political consideration?

[My hearts in London - Everett]

"The PACER links"

Explain what this is, please, and why it's noteworthy?

[patriot08]

GREAT. I’M ON IT!

[Danae]

PACER is a system with in the legal community that allows the linkage of legal documents. They wend town in the hour between the Judge receiving his own decision by fax and his transmission of the signed order to the lawyers on the case. It is speculated that they were broken at that time because the decision that he wrote and the one that he signed are different. Its speculation.

[danamco]

That would make him an Illegal Alien who cannot even hold his current Senate seat.

Or less stay in his Illinois mansion!

He probably will move in with half brother in Kenya @ $12 a year, Oh I forgot, he is NOT welcome there!!

So maybe he need to move back to Indonesia, or seek for asylum in Sweden as a political refugee !!!

[janee]

you bring up Great Britain. off subject (but not really!) I’m watching Kansas City at NY Jets game - they sang the Our National Anthem and then they sang God Save the Queen! What goes there?

[arrogantsob]

Of course candidates don’t work for us. They are not paid by the feds. That is the point, candidates are not the same as officials. Did they say the same about officials?

[FreedomCalls]

You’ve got me on the Goldwater cases; I had no idea it was an issue with him. I’m 45, which as far as I can tell is fairly young in terms of FReeper demographics. Was Goldwater a military brat born overseas, or what?

The issuse was that Goldwater was born in Arizona when it was still a territory -- not yet a state. It acquired statehood in 1912. Goldwater was born in Phoenix in 1909. There were numerous lawsuits in 1964 claiming that he wasn't therefore a natural-born citizen for constitutional purposes.

[FreedomCalls]

you bring up Great Britain. off subject (but not really!) I’m watching Kansas City at NY Jets game - they sang the Our National Anthem and then they sang God Save the Queen! What goes there?

Isn't that the game being played in London at Wembley Stadium?

[mountainbunny]

Well n00b, you started with a strawman and really beat the hell out of it didn’t ya! ... “If they were given ‘other’ documents, when these rumors started, they would have immediately begun investigating.” Nice agitprop work there, n00b. Disgusting Obamoperatives are scuzzying up the FR homesite.

I'm not a "noob" and I said if because so many people have implied that he didn't have to give his birth certificate when he got his passport. I was covering all bases.

It's sort of sad and pitiful, not to mention telling that you can offer no rebuttal, but can only throw insults and accusations. One does not have to be an Obama supporter to demand more proof than "none" and to assume that the various intelligence agencies that keep us safe every day are smarter than "some guys on the internet".

Because nothing I said changes the fact that to believe that the government doesn't know if Obama is a citizen or not requires you to believe that the State Department, CIA and FBI are nothing but a bunch of bumbling morons.

If Obama gave his birth certificate when he got his passport, the State Department has a copy. They have experts to determine if it is real. If they wanted a better copy, they have ways of getting them.

If Obama gave other documents when he got his passport, as allowed, as soon as these rumors started, those "other documents" would have raised eyebrows and they would have doubled their efforts to know whether he is a citizen or not.

Or is it that the CIA, FBI & State Departments, plus the President the answer to all know, and they are part of the Vast Liberal Conspiracy?

Which is it? Is it that a US Senator, first elected in 2004 has outwitted the entirety of US Intelligence, or are they, along with the current President, in cahoots to have Obama and Democrats nationwide elected?

[Reily]

“.........
Or is it that the CIA, FBI & State Departments, plus the President the answer to all know, and they are part of the Vast Liberal Conspiracy?

Which is it? Is it that a US Senator, first elected in 2004 has outwitted the entirety of US Intelligence, or are they, along with the current President, in cahoots to have Obama and Democrats nationwide elected?
........................................”

Part of the reason an Obama gets any traction at is too many people both conservative & liberal haven't a clue how the government actually functions !
The government agencies you named HAVE NO AUTHORITY TO DO ANYTHING ABOUT A DOMESTIC POLITICAL CANDIDATE!
That's the voters job !
If Satan himself wins office by convincing a majority of the voters to support him. He wins, PERIOD!!!!!!!!!!!
And if its an office that has national security implications he is CLEARED !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
He is vetted by constitutionally assuming office !
The 3 letter alphabet soup agencies you named are constitutionally bound to accept the outcome as is the military. Also the are constitutionally bound to do nothing to prevent it!
When voting someone to a national office character matters !
Well Duh !

[Pelagius of Asturias]

What’s missing here is that Obama could be a naturalized citizen and have a passport. There are a whole bunch of possibilities why he is so secretive about his birth.

That Hawaii birth certificate I have seen on the internet looks similar to the Tenneessee birth certificates of my adopted cousin. Curious. I have stated in other threads that it looks more like a car title than an original certificate, just like my cousin’s

[MHGinTN]

“It’s sort of sad and pitiful, not to mention telling that you can offer no rebuttal, but can only throw insults and accusations.” Um, n00b, calling you on your specious strawman starting absurdity is in fact substance. I understand why you want to characterize it otherwise, but you just out yourself more with this continued whine.

[Brown Deer]

It is GOING SUPREME HERE COMES MSM civil action: 08-cv- 04083

[danamco]

And running isn't injury--how is Berg or anyone else hurt by the fact that someone is running for President? Direct injury getting standing is where the person gets elected and can and does take action that damages your economic or personal interest or assets in some fashion. Even then, there is room for argument.

This juridico Mumbo Jumbo language gets my head spinning!

If I am left with the ONLY option that a criminal person is "running" (means on the ballot) and I have no OTHER choices (I cannot and should not be an enabler) to vote for a bona-fide candidate, I am sure being injured, am I not!!

By voting for this candidate I became a guilty enambler!!!

[Pelagius of Asturias]

This is an unprecedented situation. There are no historical events to compare to the possibility of an unqualified candidate being elected president. "If Satan himself wins office by convincing a majority of the voters to support him. He wins, PERIOD!!!!!!!!!!!" I really must disagree. This assumes that Obama is really not qualified: It might take the instance of a career government employee disobeying an executive order for the issue is settled.

[Polarik]

>He is going to ask the SCOTUS to change the law in essence. To make it possible for the average person to question the qualifications of a candidate for President.

Apparently, the only body with the legal authority, or "standing" to challenge Obama is the Justice Department, so sayeth Judge Surrick.

since all of the House of representatives are up for reelection, we need to contact as many as possible and convince them that we are of the verge of electing a President who has never been vetted, who is not a natural-born citizen, and who used a fraudulent document image to cover it up.

[Pelagius of Asturias]

Let’s assume that Congress passes a law (how about a new “assault” weapon ban for example) someone decides to disobey that law and sue because it was signed and enforced by a President who should be constitutionally disallowed to be president. I guess that would be “standing.”