How much do you want to bet that the next round of Kyoto allows China to continue growing its greenhouse gas emissions at this rate? Kyoto was never intended to reduce greenmhouse gas emissions...it was intended to damage the USA.
1 posted on
10/22/2008 4:42:50 AM PDT by
NRG1973
To: NRG1973
China, thanks for the info. We will be sure to ignore it since the rules are that you can do anything you want.
2 posted on
10/22/2008 4:51:35 AM PDT by
Right Wing Assault
("..this administration is planning a 'Right Wing Assault' on values and ideals.." - John Kerry)
To: NRG1973; Defendingliberty; WL-law; Genesis defender; proud_yank; FrPR; enough_idiocy; rdl6989; ...
To: NRG1973
I think it's the old Chi Com money grab scam...a chi com `think tank' put's out a bogus report that goes along with what the evironazis want to hear and we end up paying to fix there gas!
To: NRG1973
How much do you want to bet that the next round of Kyoto allows China to continue growing its greenhouse gas emissions at this rate? Kyoto was never intended to reduce greenmhouse gas emissions...it was intended to damage the USA. You're right. And the USA will pledge hundreds of billions of [OUR tax] dollars to help China, India, Kenya and Indonesia cut emissions.
5 posted on
10/22/2008 5:02:44 AM PDT by
The Sons of Liberty
(Just your average "Whitey" - clinging to my guns and religion!)
To: NRG1973
Isn’t global warming a hoax anyway?
To: NRG1973
CO2 could double! Wow! Their plants are really gonna start growing ... *snicker*
7 posted on
10/22/2008 5:56:33 AM PDT by
TexGuy
(If it has the slimmest of chances of being considered sarcasm ... IT IS!)
To: NRG1973
Since the climate has been cooling for a while, perhaps this will help prevent an ice age. (/S)
8 posted on
10/22/2008 6:14:10 AM PDT by
CPOSharky
(Blaming CO2 for global warming is like blaming your thermometer for your kid's fever.)
To: NRG1973; Right Wing Assault
How much do you want to bet that the next round of Kyoto allows China to continue growing its greenhouse gas emissions at this rate? Kyoto was never intended to reduce greenmhouse gas emissions...it was intended to damage the USA.China, thanks for the info. We will be sure to ignore it since the rules are that you can do anything you want.
Actually, if you work the numbers, even at the high end of the estimate in 2030 (4 billion tons), the per capita output of CO2 would still be less than the US in 2007.
To: NRG1973
How the hell did they pass us? I’m doing everything I can to raise our “greenhouse gas” emissions.
12 posted on
10/23/2008 11:20:38 AM PDT by
HenpeckedCon
(Deport them all... Let God sort them out!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
