Posted on 09/29/2008 7:42:06 AM PDT by PJ-Comix
Okay, the announcement you've all been waiting for about Joe Biden. Your humble correspondent has been hinting about this for several weeks.
On July 23, 1986 Joe Biden suffered a complete mental meltdown, captured on video, when he was questioning Secretary of State George Schultz during a Senate hearing. Basically Schultz kept his mouth shut as Biden had what really amounted to a nervous breakdown in which he petulantly whined solo for a couple of minutes with no interruption. It was a sight to behold. This is a video that MUST be seen to be believed. Anybody normal person watching this video will see that Biden is too mentally unstable to ever get near the White House.
Anyway, I passed info about this video up the food chain a few weeks ago. I had talked to the C-SPAN archives in Lafayette, IN and the woman there even gave me the ID # of the video in question. However, when later looked into, the video became "unavailable" because it supposedly ended up in the National Archives where no one can seem to locate it.
However, since this video also appeared on all three major networks at the time, ABC, NBC, and CBS, it is also at the Vanderbilt University News Archive. Therefore, I am asking anybody interested (which is probably quite a few of you), especially in the Nashville area, to go to those newscast archives and obtain a copy of the newscasts on the major networks for July 23, 1986. Your jaws will drop when you actually see the video. Oh, and let me know when you get the video because I will see that it gets as much online dissemination as possible.
Find this video and Joe Biden goes DOWN! Barack Obama goes DOWN! Democrat Party goes DOWN!
And what does this say about Obama's vetting process that they let this Biden meltdown somehow slip by them?
It is a scandal that this video is not already out there since all three of the major networks know about it since all of them broadcast this incident.
Hopefully the networks can be bypassed and the public can see it for themselves.
In fact, I just checked and it is spelled “Shultz.” Drop the “c” and you should find it.
And what happens if he has another aneurysm while president? Such a condition is a definite disqualifier.
I don't want Biden in the presidency but anyone no matter how they have been before can suffer an anureysm.
My point was don't say he had a Mental Breakdown, when he was having some mini strokes.
“Bienvenidos from the fruited plain.” Or “Por favor, don’t act like a mind-numbed robot!”
Love it - what a great story! I’d say Mrs. Comix lives up to her name. :)
My DIL is from Honduras. She and my son celebrated their second anniversary last week, and she still struggles with English. One problem is my son is fluent in Spanish, so he babies her - a lot. She’s able to have a simple conversation, but she’s unhappy with herself. I’ll pass along how you handled it... :)
See my post at #63
Send it to Michelle Malkin.
bttt for home
How about ping or freepmail Mark Levin? He can get it to Rush.
bump for later
I get on all the time. Just tell them you are a chick feminist first time caller.
The MSM has read this post and is taking the appropriate action.
The law never stops the dems from doing anything. That aside, I’ve concluded that it is not in Hillery’s best interest to be on Onada ticket. Reason: The guy will screw up things really bad. However, if that happens will voters really want to do a reprise with the leftist dem Hillery?
So, if I’m Hillery, I play for time. That translates to hoping something happens to Onada on the way to the forum. Then somehow she may have an opportunity. But it’s a very long shot.
I think Hillery’s truly between a rock and hard place. And I like it that way.
I just looked up the symptoms of cerebral aneurysms. Vomiting and loss of consciousness are two of the symptoms. Acting like an idiot isn’t.
Well, since no one except you apparently has seen the video, and now it is gone, I am not able to make that judgement.
Biden: But I want to tell you something, what disturbs me more than the policy, what we call the policy, is the rationale for the policy. You set out in four principles that you adhere to. On page 14 (you say) 'We must not become part of South Africa's problem. We must remain part of the solution. We must not aim to impose ourselves, our solutions, or our favorites in South Africa.'Dammit, we (do) have favorites in South Africa. The favorites in South Africa are the people who are being repressed by the ugly white regime. We have favorites. Our loyality is not to South Africa, it's to South Africans. And the South Africans are majority black, and they are being excoriated. It's not to some stupid public government over there. It is not the Afrikaner regime. We have no loyalty to them. We have no loyality to South Africa. It's to (black) South Africans...Given that the topic over which Biden was going crazy was his opposition to apartheid, it is hard to see how his delivery would now, over twenty years later, be taken to be evidence of his being temperamentally unqualified to be president.(Pounding the table for emphasis) The have begged; they have borrowed; they have crawled, and now they've taken up arms.
Biden (Referring to the South African timetable for ending apartheid called for by Reagan): What is our timetable? What are we saying to that repugnant regime? Are we saying you've got 20 days, 20 months, 20 years? We ask them to put up a timetable. What is our timetable? Where do we stand morally?
I don’t understand why any modern campaign machine would not already have this video. On the other hand, I can’t imagine that the campaign machine of a Chicago street thug like Obama wouldn’t have researched and eradicated all traces of such a video.
bump! bump! bump!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.