Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: LibertyRocks; Gondring

From the ‘Civics Library Of The Missouri Bar’

Defamation and the Public Official

http://members.mobar.org/civics/DefamePubOff.htm

Pertinent pasages:

“The court ruled that constitutional guarantees prohibit a public official from recovering damages for a defamatory falsehood relating to his official conduct unless he proves that the statement was made with actual malice. Actual malice was defined as (1) knowledge of falsity, or (2) reckless disregard as to the truth or falsity of the statement. The court thereby ruled that a conditional privilege and the allowance of the defense of truth required by the First and Fourteenth Amendments applied.”

“The effect of this landmark case was the recognition of a qualified privilege under the U. S. Constitution to criticize public officials and candidates without liability for defamation. However, the court failed to outline the definition of ‘public official.’ What individuals were to be included in the term?”

“The Supreme Court later had the opportunity to clarify that point in its ruling in Rosenblatt v. Baer. Here the court stated, ‘The term public official applies at the very least to those among the hierarchy of government employees who have, or appear to the public to have, substantial responsibility for or control over the conduct of governmental affairs.’ It also indicated that the public official must occupy a position that would invite public scrutiny and discussion of the person holding it.”

“In the Sullivan and Rosenblatt cases, the Supreme Court once again walked the fine but discernible line between the public official and the private citizen engaged in open discussion. The First Amendment was adopted in order to preserve the open discussion by the public of all political issues, including public officials. To allow a public official to recover every time someone made a statement that was not completely true would result in self-censorship of the press and the public discussion of these officials.”

END

Notice the last sentence:

“To allow a public official to recover every time someone made a statement that was not completely true would result in self-censorship of the press and the public discussion of these officials.”

STE=Q


137 posted on 09/26/2008 10:28:02 PM PDT by STE=Q ("These are the times that try men's souls." -- Thomas Paine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies ]


To: STE=Q

TYPO: pasages = passages


138 posted on 09/26/2008 10:29:48 PM PDT by STE=Q ("These are the times that try men's souls." -- Thomas Paine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies ]

To: STE=Q

VERY interesting! Thanks for the ping to that. Looks like Obama is going to be rather disappointed...


139 posted on 09/26/2008 11:28:22 PM PDT by LibertyRocks ( http://LibertyRocks.wordpress.com ~ Pro-Palin & NObama Gear : http://cafepress.com/NO_ObamaBiden08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies ]

To: STE=Q

Note also, “official conduct”...


147 posted on 09/27/2008 3:10:50 PM PDT by Gondring (I'll give up my right to die when hell freezes over my dead body!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson