[markomalley]

There is so much wrong about this piece, I don't know where to start.

It goes to show you that the real enemies are the liberals, who would sell the muzzies the rope to hang themselves with.

[Unam Sanctam]

She said during that interview that the United States "must do whatever it takes" to fight terrorism. This implies the same amoral existentialism that terrorists use. It goes against the very principles of Western civilization that the jihadists seek to destroy.

And JFK said we should "pay any price, bear any burden..."

[Unam Sanctam]

She said during that interview that the United States "must do whatever it takes" to fight terrorism. This implies the same amoral existentialism that terrorists use. It goes against the very principles of Western civilization that the jihadists seek to destroy.

And JFK said we should "pay any price, bear any burden..."

[Unam Sanctam]

She said during that interview that the United States "must do whatever it takes" to fight terrorism. This implies the same amoral existentialism that terrorists use. It goes against the very principles of Western civilization that the jihadists seek to destroy.

And JFK said we should "pay any price, bear any burden..."

[alecqss]

She said during that interview that the United States "must do whatever it takes" to fight terrorism. This implies the same amoral existentialism that terrorists use.

What, it implies that?! Great, I will tell it to the management in my company next time they insist that I "must do whatever it takes" to finish project on time. I'll tell them that they are just like terrorists...

[Fred]

[AndyTheBear]

She said during that interview that the United States "must do whatever it takes" to fight terrorism. This implies the same amoral existentialism that terrorists use. It goes against the very principles of Western civilization that the jihadists seek to destroy[emphasis added]

How long must we endure such IDIOCY?!?

Which does he mean by this sloppy thought: that the Jihadists wish to destroy Western Civilization or that they wish to destroy a principle of not "doing whatever it takes"?

Neither works.

Certainly "doing whatever it takes" is, by definition, what will stop the Jihadists from destroying Western Civilization.

On the other hand, certainly the Jihadists are more opposed to the principle of "doing whatever it takes" then they would be to something the author would consider more palatable. Which at the most must be "doing less than what it takes".

[RichInOC]

The Palin Doctrine?

“There’s plenty of room for all God’s creatures...right next to the mashed potatoes.”

[VigilantAmerican]

More and more I’m amazed at how sophomoric and undisciplined some of these high-falutin’ professional journalists are. Less and less I revere and respect their being published in widely read journals, as if they carry some kind of imprimatur based on circulation and being the “gatekeepers” of public discourse.

Why does the lame and unfounded “logic” in this article pass for professional writing?

The internet is so wonderful in that amidst all the sloshing, dirty bathwater, we have some truly talented amateur babies that really give the professionals not only a run for their money, but often just plain outclass, outgun, and outwrite the “professionals.”

[Don Corleone]

The only one who knows the “Bush Doctrine” completely is ... you guessed it ....”BUSH”!

[Impy]

Call out media lies: The Impy Doctrine.