Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Probability of McCain Win (Vanity)
09/14/09 | Tom Ewall

Posted on 09/13/2008 10:21:03 PM PDT by TomEwall

I considered the states that Rasmussen has listed as leaning or toss-ups and used the "Last" values for Intrade to determine the probability of a given state being won. Doing a weighted average, I came with McCain's expected value to be 268.74, which is just under 269, a tie.

Doing a Monte Carlo simulation I came up with the probability of a McCain win being 49.4%, a similar result to the weighted average.


TOPICS: Politics/Elections; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: electionpresident; mccain; mccainpalin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 next last
To: volunbeer
MarrymeSarah is already taken.....LOL! ....darn.
21 posted on 09/13/2008 10:49:57 PM PDT by skinkinthegrass (If you aren't "advancing" your arguments,your losing "the battle of Ideas"...libs,hates the facts 8^)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: chaos_5

I used the probabilities from Intrade and did Monte Carlo simulations, a million trials at a time, which showed a 49.4% chance of winning, based on the 12 states I used.

Intrade is just what people’s expectations are, so can be wrong. For example, for a long time they had Obama as a favorite to win in Ohio, even by over 60%. That never made any sense to me. If I were a betting man, I would have taken that, because at no time, in my opinion, did McCain ever have less than a 40% chance of winning Ohio.


22 posted on 09/13/2008 10:50:11 PM PDT by TomEwall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Crim

“Honestly...I’m a union guy....there are alot of union people they are counting on that wont vote for a black man....ever....for any reason...they all yell “hell yea”...until they get in the voting booth...”

Crim - SO interesting that you said that - just tonight, I heard a panel on a CNN panel special with Roland Martin about how people feel about “issues” such as gender, race, age, etc. - and there was a union person saying that he felt certain many union members will undoubtedly, despite what they say - in the booth, vote for Obama.


23 posted on 09/13/2008 10:50:14 PM PDT by llandres (I'd rather be alive and bankrupt than dead and solvent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TomEwall
One thing that can't be ignored in Obamawinsphobia is the lack of the full democrat machine behind him. Not all of the main dem dirty tricksters will be on board for him. Many will say in public they will but are closet PUMAs. Expect historically low voter fraud effect in this one.
24 posted on 09/13/2008 10:51:22 PM PDT by Hillarys Gate Cult (The man who said "there's no such thing as a stupid question" has never talked to Helen Thomas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TomEwall

Not to ruin your calculations but a new poll out of MN has them tied

http://www.startribune.com/politics/national/president/28353589.html?elr=KArks:DCiUBcy7hUiD3aPc:_Yyc:aUU


25 posted on 09/13/2008 10:53:16 PM PDT by flyfree (Biden is no Palin and Obama is no McCain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eric Blair 2084

I think the election will be close. I’m more optimistic than I was, but Obama could easily win. It’s been a good last couple of months though, so hopefully the trend will continue.

Palin has helped so much, it’s unbelievable. Even if McCain lost, she still would have helped the party by making the situation in the Congressional races much better.


26 posted on 09/13/2008 10:53:45 PM PDT by TomEwall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Bush Revolution

Even though I’m still a newbie here, I think you should just ask Jim Robinson to help you with that.

However, it’s not such a bad screen name. W is one of the Good Guys.


27 posted on 09/13/2008 10:53:52 PM PDT by llandres (I'd rather be alive and bankrupt than dead and solvent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Bush Revolution

The Bradley effect has little to do with race. It is not that a voter won’t vote for a black candidate, but rather they wont tell a pollster if they plan not to vote for the black candidate.


28 posted on 09/13/2008 10:54:02 PM PDT by JLS (Do you really want changec being two guys from the majority of Congress with a 9% approval rating?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: TomEwall

It’s not even going to be close. Obama won’t win more than 10 states.


29 posted on 09/13/2008 10:56:26 PM PDT by Eric Blair 2084 (Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms shouldn't be a federal agency...it should be a convenience store.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: flyfree

This doesn’t have anything to do with my calculations, which were taken from Intrade, not from polls.

Anyway, that’s great news! You saw a couple of days ago there was a Michigan poll that had McCain ahead by 1?


30 posted on 09/13/2008 10:56:53 PM PDT by TomEwall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Brytani
Pretty pathetic for union officials to try and get a bunch of nuclear workers to vote for a candidate who’s completely against nuclear power....

Can you say, "Pwned"? I knew you could!!

the infowarrior

31 posted on 09/13/2008 10:57:09 PM PDT by infowarrior (“Let the voters decide if Palin is laughable.”-Tublecane)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Eric Blair 2084
It has everything to do with this particular candidate being unqualified and a closet Saul Alinsky style America hating Marxist.
bingo! ....race unimportant...Col. Allen West / Herman Cain / Blackwell / Steele...all much more qualified than Zero OBambi / OBiden

32 posted on 09/13/2008 10:57:22 PM PDT by skinkinthegrass (If you aren't "advancing" your arguments,your losing "the battle of Ideas"...libs,hates the facts 8^)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Bush Revolution

” hope it has to do more with the fact that he is a very scary candidate more than his race.”

Oh, AMEN to that. Not his race - it’s about all the other things he is, stands for, and plans for this country.


33 posted on 09/13/2008 10:58:17 PM PDT by llandres (I'd rather be alive and bankrupt than dead and solvent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Eric Blair 2084

I think the actually number of people who would “never vote for a black guy” is actually very low.

But I do think there are a certain number of people who only needs one good reason to not vote for the black guy. The don’t want to be racist, so they need that one good reason with which they can rationalize to themselves that the reason they aren’t voting for the black guy is something other than racism.

How big this group of people are differs depending on whom you talk to.


34 posted on 09/13/2008 11:00:16 PM PDT by Truthsearcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: llandres

I agree too. Mostly the plans to raise taxes and increase the size of Government concerns me.


35 posted on 09/13/2008 11:00:42 PM PDT by TomEwall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: llandres

I think that union rep is delusional.


36 posted on 09/13/2008 11:00:53 PM PDT by snarkytart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: TomEwall
I've used Monte Carlo methods for rendering fractals.
http://chaos5.deviantart.com/gallery/#Fractals

As for the Intrade, I trust that more than MSM opinion polls. Before Palin, no one could have predicted the swing McCain has taken. To be fair thought, it isn't over yet, and anything can still happen. I think the closer we get to the election, the less likely we are to see a major shift.

37 posted on 09/13/2008 11:01:27 PM PDT by chaos_5 (See my profile for cool McCain/Palin "lipstick" stickers!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Gator_that_eats_Dems

Now I can vote


38 posted on 09/13/2008 11:03:21 PM PDT by OKIEDOC (The Difference Between Palin and Obama is Common Sense, She's GOT IT, He DOESN'T)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: TomEwall
The problem with using Intrade to predict is that people invest in Intrade for the short term as well as the long term. From what I have been able to tell, Intrade is fine at reflecting how people feel at the moment, but is a lousy predictor of the future.

I could have made a fortune on Intrade voting for McCain and against Romney.

39 posted on 09/13/2008 11:05:16 PM PDT by flyfree (Biden is no Palin and Obama is no McCain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: TomEwall

Well...he said he was in it to win it.

Lord love the ATTACK pilot!*

*Attack...as in what McCain actually did.
He wasn’t a fighter pilot.


40 posted on 09/13/2008 11:08:10 PM PDT by dixiechick2000 (Sarah'cuda Rocks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson