Sound not synchronized on Palin Gibson interview?

[KayEyeDoubleDee]

Is it just my local cable tv company, or is the ABC sound not synchronized with the lip movements?

If this is national, it's really unforgivable.

[Truth is a Weapon]

How can she be called a bushbot and be unclear about his doctrine? While I agree she should have known more, how can the Rats claim both of those problems at the same time?

[rtsimon]

When he asked about traveling outside of the country he didn’t even look at her. Almost like rolling his eyes.

[RedBloodedTexan]

I’d like to know where these “feeds” are you guys are talking about. I’m searching desperatly for somewhere online to watch the interview in it’s entirety. I think I have found a Central ABC Station on live feed, but I’ll have to wait for WNT. :( From the clips I’ve watched on ABC’s site though, the editing did look like a cut and paste job of a kindergartner. Despicable. Made the interview of Obama by OReilly look like a million bucks (as far as editing goes).

[AnotherUnixGeek]

I expect her to be able to handle herself with confidence, poise and some good answers. That's why she's in the big leagues.

Yup. There's no question she deserves the sympathy and strong defense she's gotten due to the unwarranted personal attacks by the media and leftist blogs. But now she needs to step up and handle substantive questions on policy issues with intelligence and clarity. I hope she's doing that.

[MittFan08]

Ok, the Bush doctrine thing was a mistake, but I thought she did ok.

At any rate, she’s far exceeeded my expectations from when she was first selected- she knows a good bit about the world it seems.

I think her interview style will get better- she was nervous. A good start.

[waus]

What we have just witnessed is an all out assault to destroy Palin by the MSM.

I ABSOLUTELY guarantee you if we were to see the “raw” footage, it would be a completely different story.

Remember how the head of 60 Minutes said that Clinton would have lost the election if he had edited the interview with the Clinton’s differently.

[pfflier]

What is unforgiveable is his idiotic question to her

"Are you qualified to be Vice President...I mean are you really really qualified...Did you study in your civics class in high school...Are you as smart as a democrat???" THAT QUESTION

It is time to remind those twits that she needs to be 35 years old, a natural born American citizen and a resident of the US for 14 years.

That is all the Constitution requires!!

[Maine Mariner]

Even a single would be okay. All she needs to do is not strike out or commit any errors.

[buccaneer81]

Second part went better.

[JFC]

Sarah Palin did fine. It will not matter who interviews her, they all the the “interview”, they all want to get her to mis-speak. Charlie didn’t do it. What he did do is come across to millions of us females in a condesending way and didn’t give a rats ass what she had to say, he was not even listening. The edit job shows why I do not watch biased MSM.

[hunter112]

Gibson asked about the "Bush Doctrine" and she didn't seem quite sure what it was...

No, she let him define it. She was damned smart not to say yes or no to something as vague as "the Bush Doctrine", which at this point in history would mean many different things to many different people.

[RoseofTexas]

We have to be cunning and NOT let these bastard beat us. One way to defeat them is NOT to grant them interviews. They know how to manipulate the interview and clips!! WHAT THE HECK was our team thinking. SOMEONE dropped the ball!

[bushfamfan]

I thought she did pretty good as well. You people seem to be overreacting and freaking out over not knowing “the Bush Doctrine”. She didn’t know it was called that, but she could at least tell you where she would stand on different issues. Calm the hell down.

[Hattie]

I predicted this folks. ABC hates her just like all the rest of the media.

[GOP Poet]

Did they only shoot with one camera? I have not seen the entire interview, but I did see an excerpt and it showed no over the shoulder shots (on both sides) and the set up was on her right mainly facing Charlie who was angled toward the camera and the angle of the camera was a subtle placing of him slightly above her and on the dominant right side of the frame.

In essence this all adds up to seeing just a side view of her (we see a whole lot of her calves) and not her eyes, which in the shot I saw is quite objectiving in itself. Whereas Charlie is the main subject in that long shot. Based on just that set up, I am unsure if they have a larger variety of shots in the piece, it doesn't allow us to connect with her or even see her clearly really. Hope they showed more shots than what I saw.

The editing sounds like a hit job as does the interview. Where did people see this thing? It all sounds like a disjointed piece of poo.

[A_Niceguy_in_CA]

Further proof Gov. Palin is NOT a Bushbot, not recognizing the MSM definition of “The Bush Doctrine.”

[FLCowboy,]

Any negatives from this interview will also reflect poorly on Gibson. Some real stupid questions that any answer would be subject to interpretation. I doubt they try to spin too much from this.

I missed the opening, but the closing that addressed her comments in church about Iraq being a mission from God I thought she answered vaguely enough. God has a plan for all of us, and for everything. How many of us have heard that in church.