Replies

"I've read most of these, including the newer ones with supposedly "better" evidence. It's baloney. The only thing to remember is for "FDR to know" mean willing and active complicity by hundreds of cryptanalysts and radio men THEN, and their lying about it for 50 years after the fact. Yet every single one of them tells the same story. There was no advance information."

"Hmmm...your inability to comprehend written English doesn't really lend you any credibility. I never said I was an expert on Pearl Harbor or even WWII history, nor have I said anything in this thread that could be reasonably misinterpreted as such."

Sorry, sincere apologies, my mistake.

I misread both quotes above as coming from Mr. Silverback.
In fact, the first quote is from LS.
But Mr. Silverback picked up on my response to LS, and I didn't notice the switch-off.

So, if I understand now, LS is the real expert here, while Mr. Silverback more-or-less specializes in insults -- is that about right?

Yikes - is FreeRepublic on top of issues or what???

I just saw a quickie interview on the morning Fox show with the author Schweikart and sure enough the topic is already being discussed here on this wonderful forum.

I’ll add no more - the work has been done! Well done!

Well I’ll add something:

If young minds are being fed unquestioned inaccurate information, what does this spell for the future of our
population - turning them into robots who all believe the one ideology preached out of texts?

Just look at the universities and what they are creating.
The one strength of this nation is that people have been free to question and argue and think outside the box - now we are happily raising robots who never think to challenge
the status quo?

Rape of the nation’s intellect.

Actually, the only insulting thing I've said was "moronic," and I didn't direct that at a specific person but at the idea that "FDR knew."

Please don't bother trying to make me feel guilty for thinking these theories are loopy...it's a waste of your time.