Posted on 09/07/2008 4:54:42 AM PDT by Kaslin
zer0bama’s co-author of one of his “two autobiographies before the age of 50”
said that Barry was the master of nasty attacks behind the scenes while publicly decrying those attacks.
“i can say without reservation that i hate the left.”
i would say the same but it seems that hate is too tame a word to describe extreme revulsion, disgust and abhorrence; not even those words are adequate. think of what the left has done in the last century and try to think of the words that would describe indescribable acts of cruelty and treachery; it’s just an impossible task for language to adequately describe cosmic foulness.
IMHO
They are right to be fearful.
She represents the dismantling of their power base.
It’s in her record, it’s in her attitude, it’s in her character.
Bill Clinton did not get what he deserved.
I thought so too. I wasn’t able to pay close attention when this all started after McCain announced Palin as his choice. After the outrageous claims about the baby began, the mainstream media said Palin was at fault for bringing this on her daughter by accepting the offer of VP - when it was the left that started the rumor in the first place deliberately targeting her daughter!
mortal language cannot describe immortal evil.
but it makes perfect sense, as does all the policies of the left, when viewed in the eternal Good v Evil, Yahweh V Satan battle.
You don't know what I'm talking about, and so I'm the ass?
Anyone on Free Republic during the Clinton years will have seen it half a dozen times at least, and then there's this post from December 2007 here on FR.
Or March 8, 2003 - and nobody posting on the thread batted an eye.
Thankfully, the one adult in all of this has been Senator Obama.
Yeah, right. He left the dirty work to others. His own campaign web site had the crap on it. There is no indication that he fired the webmaster. No, Barry is playing puppet master, getting puppets to do the dirty work while shedding crocodile tears over the slime.
None of us “get what we deserve” due to the mercy of God.
Take heart in “eternal judgement”, though.
I agree. If a Democratic Sarah Palin had emerged, I think that conservatives would actually be saddened and would say so, in no uncertain terms. It would be a mournful recitation, not an angry, vindictive one. It all goes to the central fact of conservatism (at least, the Christian kind): we are all on a journey and we definitely make mistakes along the way. It is not that we err, but what we do when we have erred, that makes all the difference. We would lament a liberl Sarah's errors and misjudgment, point out her logical and philosophical flaws and generally try to keep the rhetorical bridge unburnt.
After all, anyone who comes to their senses might actually be MORE effective for good than one who never strayed in the first place. To err is to have one's heart and mind rubbed in the consequences and have the opportunity to connect the proper dots for those who never had to cope that way.
“i would say the same but it seems that hate is too tame a word to describe extreme revulsion, disgust and abhorrence; not even those words are adequate. think of what the left has done in the last century and try to think of the words that would describe indescribable acts of cruelty and treachery; it’s just an impossible task for language to adequately describe cosmic foulness.”
Sometimes words are inadequate and fail. This may be one of those times. I agree with your sentiment.
So how is Obe’s Community Organizing going since he has to send HIS kids to a snooty, expensive, private school?
So the issue is not the process, but the scale of that process? The participation of national media in that process? At least we should be clear here about what we're finding objectionable.
I recall that MSNBC canned David Shuster for saying that Chelsea was "pimped out" by Hillary during the senate campaign, and that was merely a tasteless choice of words, not a literal reference to sexual prostitution. But again, here on FR, it was repeated and reinforced, along with stories about Chelsea's "gay bar pub crawl."
I suppose if the major networks canned everyone who sad vicious and nasty things about Palin and her family, though, they'd have to shut down.
During the first months of his campaign, he was ‘above’ the fray, above race.
He started falling behind Clinton. He found the race card. He used the race card throughout the remaining months, against Clinton and even some at GOP nominee McCain.
Yesterday, Team Obama found the race card again and started using it against Palin. Someone raised an allegation that Palin referred to Obama as ‘Sambo’ in a restaurant some months ago.
Look for the race card to be used more and more. After all, that is about the only weapon Obama has in his arsenal.
Yeah right. He left the dirty work to others...etc...
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
When L Flint offered a million bucks to anyone who could get ANY dirt on a sitting ‘R’ during one of WJC’s tribulations, Clinton sat there with that $hit Eatin Grin and said—I have no control over what other people do—.
Which, in essence, is true but he didn’t even have the wherewithall to denounce the move (with the same grin).
Well, I suppose one or two percent might still fit the difinition of "many."
I hope you sent a well worded KMA to your “Bro” Bob for his unsolicited screed.
You're kidding, right? I can think of many.
Ted Kennedy, Chappaquiddick. Bill Clinton, woman abuser and perjurer. Charles Schumer, Indymac bank. Gerry Studds, pedophile. William Jefferson, money in freezer. Ronnie Earle, prosecuting DeLay. Mike Nifong, Duke University (should be in jail).
And these are the ones just off the top of my head!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.