Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CharlesWayneCT

You have no concept of moral and social issues, do you?

Sir. Do you see NOTHING wrong with an unplanned teenage pregnancy?

Do you not know that conservatives on this forum routinely disparage young teenaged mothers?

Now we are praising them?

Sorry. I’m not a hypocrite.

And let me also challenge you. Post one article from last week disclosing this pregnancy.

Can’t do it? That’s because it was politically expedient for McCain/Palin to hide that fact.

And that’s a low-life move.


114 posted on 09/01/2008 5:11:29 PM PDT by Responsibility2nd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies ]


To: Responsibility2nd

I guess fishin’ is out.


129 posted on 09/01/2008 5:23:17 PM PDT by silentreignofheroes (In my day,Flunking gym was not an option , even for Stupid Kids!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies ]

To: Responsibility2nd

No one is praising her for being pregnant. Everyone is praising her for telling her parents and deciding to have her baby and marry her boyfriend.

Most of what you pass off as debate points or arguements are simply lies.

It’s already been proven that they hid nothing. The girl was known to be pregnant and wearing an engagement ring from her boyfriend. You will never sell the lie that because McCain or Palin didn’t announce it to the world prior to or at the time Palin was announced, that they were hiding it.

It isn’t hidden. It’s out there to be known and seen and found out by anyone.

Another lie is that there’s an automatic political issue to be had if the child of a candidate does something or other that’s normally a personal matter. She didn’t commit a crime. She wasn’t arrested, didn’t get pulled over or caught with a phoney ID buying booze, etc. Even if she had, that’s HER, not her mother.

You seem to think you’re hot stuff. You look dishonest, dimwitted and venal, if you ask me.

And even if you didn’t.


143 posted on 09/01/2008 5:31:20 PM PDT by txrangerette (Just say "no" to the Obama Cult.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies ]

To: Responsibility2nd; CharlesWayneCT

“You have no concept of moral and social issues, do you?”

OH, I assure you he does.


“Do you see NOTHING wrong with an unplanned teenage pregnancy?”

First, how do you know it was unplanned? Second, Bristol and her family are taking complete responsibility for the situation, and so is the father of the child.


“Do you not know that conservatives on this forum routinely disparage young teenaged mothers?”

Mostly the ones who don’t even know who the father is, and who abort the child before it is born, or as.
Or who are on drugs, and neglect their newborn.


“Now we are praising them?”

What we are praising is the STAND UP and TAKE RESPONSIBILITY attitude and actions of the entire PALIN FAMILY.


” Post one article from last week disclosing this pregnancy.

Can’t do it? That’s because it was politically expedient for McCain/Palin to hide that fact.”

Just because YOU didn’t know about, means very little.
EVERYONE in ALASKA knew about it, and both SARAH and her husband made a public announcement about it, instead of waiting for it to be discovered.

No one was ‘hiding’ anything. The media wants you to think so, though.


“And that’s a low-life move.”

No, a low-life move is the bloggers that have accused Bristol of being the mother of TRIG, and say the father is either Bristol’s dad, TODD, or the EX TROOPER that Sarah got fired.

That is low-life. Very, bottom of the barrel low-life.


156 posted on 09/01/2008 5:36:07 PM PDT by UCANSEE2 (The Last Boy Scout)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies ]

To: Responsibility2nd
We aren't PRAISING it, what we are doing is saying she is doing what she needs to do to take responsibility for her actions. What else can she do now? Except what the left would advise.

There is fine line between doing what is right and being sanctimonious. In the end, we pray the girl will, if she hasn't already, look at the child as a blessing and as long as they are good parents who do not go on welfare, then she has a chance to make it right. Let's give her that chance.

168 posted on 09/01/2008 5:46:08 PM PDT by gidget7 (Duncan Hunter-Valley Forge Republican!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies ]

To: Responsibility2nd

No one is praising this. What they are praising is her decision not to have an abortion and to marry the father.

I’d like to hear when it would be a good time to out of the blue willingly bring a 17 year old’s pregnancy into the national discussion. What relevance does that have? Should McCain announce Palin and so oh by the way her daughter’s pregnent.

You don’t need to be a hypocrite. You are ridiculous.


189 posted on 09/01/2008 5:58:42 PM PDT by Norman Bates (Freepmail me to be part of the McCain List!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies ]

To: Responsibility2nd
And that’s a low-life move.

No - McCain/Palin aren't the low-lifes........YOU ARE!

200 posted on 09/01/2008 6:04:32 PM PDT by 2nd amendment mama ( www.2asisters.org | Self defense is a basic human right!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies ]

To: Responsibility2nd

Esquire, is that you? You sound just like Esquire. Are you Esquire?


207 posted on 09/01/2008 6:07:48 PM PDT by atc23 (Community Organizer? You mean Street Hustler?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies ]

To: Responsibility2nd

Of what interest is the daughter’s sin to you? Are you her priest?

If Palin had sinned in a way that the public should know about, that would be a different matter. But the sins of her daughter?

Anyway, it’s not like they hid it. They simply didn’t make it part of the initial announcement.

BTW, being pregnant is not a sin. Having sex was the sin.

So, if her mother knew she was having sex, but she had NOT been pregnant, would you have insisted they tell us that their child was committing adultery? Of what business is that of yours?

You continue to NOT answer that simple question — why do you care that some 17-year-old-girl had sex?


235 posted on 09/01/2008 6:20:13 PM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies ]

To: Responsibility2nd

BTW, they announced her pick Friday at noon. They announced her pregnancy and her engagement to the world Monday — before ANY news source had found the truth.

And if not for the media poking around, I would have preferred the girl be given a chance to tell her story to a local reporter, in her own time — it was HER privacy, not her mother’s that was being breached here.

BTW, I presume you are sending notes to the other candidates, like Bob Barr, and you send a simliar e-mail to Duncan Hunter when he was a candidate, insisting that he disclose to you his son’s sexual habits, since that apparently is something you feel the right to know.


242 posted on 09/01/2008 6:23:17 PM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson