Obama operatives in full attack against OUR VP CANDIDATE
1 posted on
08/31/2008 10:53:07 AM PDT by
rface
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81 next last
To: rface
What complete cr*p. The MSM is dooming itself to extinction.
2 posted on
08/31/2008 10:54:09 AM PDT by
hsalaw
To: rface
To: rface
Somebody already posted a photo of her here, preggers.
No legs on this one.
4 posted on
08/31/2008 10:54:42 AM PDT by
Salamander
(McCain/Palin 2008....Plenty of brass to go around.)
To: rface
WT...? This kind of thing would have been extremely difficult to hide. Pure BS, IMO.
5 posted on
08/31/2008 10:55:14 AM PDT by
LiberConservative
("Typical" white guy voting McCain/Palin)
To: rface
McCain and Palin are going to be in St Louis this afternoon.... (O'Fallon, MO)
They're supposed to be there at ~4:00.
I am headed out the door right now from Ashland.
6 posted on
08/31/2008 10:55:18 AM PDT by
rface
To: rface; informavoracious; larose; RJR_fan; Prospero; Conservative Vermont Vet; ...
+
Freep-mail me to get on or off my pro-life and Catholic List:
Add me / Remove me
Please ping me to note-worthy Pro-Life or Catholic threads, or other threads of interest.
7 posted on
08/31/2008 10:55:46 AM PDT by
narses
(...the spirit of Trent is abroad once more.)
To: rface
The MSM won't get scooped again, but to them it's perfectly acceptable to run with a DU/Kos-initiated rumor that will drag down a 17-year old girl and a 4-month old baby with Down's Syndrome.
It's official--there is no depth to which the MSM will not plumb to pump up the Democrats. Imagine had this been the Clintons or Obamas and this started coming out. The hue and cry from the Sunday talk shows would have been deafening.
8 posted on
08/31/2008 10:56:06 AM PDT by
OCCASparky
(Steely-Eyed Killer of the Deep)
To: rface
I wouldn’t worry too much about it. Despite my feelings toward McWhatshisname, Sarah Palin appears to be a good strong woman and can take on all comers.
9 posted on
08/31/2008 10:56:11 AM PDT by
cripplecreek
(Voting Conservative isn't for the faint of heart.)
To: rface
Are there no photos of Sarah Palin prego?
10 posted on
08/31/2008 10:56:12 AM PDT by
Clint N. Suhks
(For the first time in my adult life, I am proud of my McCain! GO HOCKEY MOMS!)
To: rface
I'm no expert, but how many 16 year old girls have a Downs Syndrome child compared to a 44 year old female. Also, how difficult would it be to fake a 9 month pregnancy while you're the governor of a state? I'm sure some of this is defensive on my part because I am so taken by Palin, but some of it is just plain common sense.
11 posted on
08/31/2008 10:56:52 AM PDT by
econjack
(Some people are as dumb as soup.)
To: rface
Obama needs to provide 1)Birth certificate 2)parents marriage license 3) proof of citizenship 4) proof that he is not for the violent overthrow of the USA.
12 posted on
08/31/2008 10:56:54 AM PDT by
mountainlion
(concerned conservative.)
To: rface
There was a movie called “The Candidate” or something where Jeff Bridges is the Democratic President and Joan Allen is trying to get appointed as the first female VP. Of course, the Republicans are viewed as a smear machine against women.
Now that Palin is the REPUBLICAN VP candidate, the Democrats are pulling a smear campaign that make the movie look like a bad joke.
But let’s suppose that the rumor is true. So what? The daughter made a mistake and the parents supported the child? THAT is the horrible news?
Its the abortion lobby. They want you to believe that had they aborted the child, there would be no problem.
Murderers!
To: rface
I suggest we start praying for her family, especially her children. And we should blame OBAMA every time his followers attack Palin’s daughter.
Let’s see... I’ll be this baby has a valid birth certificate; Palin can produce one, and put this to rest. That’s a better track record than Obama...
To: rface
“The mainstream media only recently found itself badly burned when tabloids and bloggers completely scooped them on a salacious rumor (John Edwards’ affair) that turned out to be 100% true”
Uh, they new about Edwards the whole time and chose not to investigate it or report it.
To: rface
lol...this is all they have, rumors invented and spread by psychotics on DU?
Their boy B-HO is going to lose in Mondalesque fashion.
16 posted on
08/31/2008 10:57:42 AM PDT by
Mr. Mojo
To: rface
Too busy to go look into Obamas past but will go to the ends of the earth to try to dig up some nonexistant dirt on Sarah Palin. Yep thats our “unbiased” news media.
18 posted on
08/31/2008 10:59:08 AM PDT by
beckysueb
(Drill here! Drill now!)
To: rface
The mainstream media only recently found itself badly burned when tabloids and bloggers completely scooped them on a salacious rumor (John Edwards’ affair) that turned out to be 100% true.”
Only someone living squarely in the center of the liberal plantation could write this bravo sierra. The MSM has been in the tank fro years and to pretend the truth wasn’t evident until they got scooped by the tabloids on Edwards is hilarious. No doubt they’d love to bring down Palin, but they’d have much better success going snipe hunting.
To: rface
and I can guarantee you that the scoop WILL happen again if the subject is a Democrat. The media will CERTAINLY protect their own.
20 posted on
08/31/2008 11:00:24 AM PDT by
DeLaine
(All that truly matters in the end is that you loved.)
To: rface
Oh for pity’s sake...I’m sure there were eye-witnesses in the Gov’s office that can testify Sarah was pregnant!
24 posted on
08/31/2008 11:01:00 AM PDT by
pray4liberty
(Stand up and pray up!)
To: rface
Amazing, just when you think they couldn’t be more idiotic, this.
25 posted on
08/31/2008 11:01:06 AM PDT by
Melinda
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson