Replies

Free Republic
Browse · Search

News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: camerakid400

A pro-choice veep after all!

5 posted on 08/21/2008 8:41:54 PM PDT by Rastus

[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rastus

A pro-choice veep after all!

That was almost funny. Missed it by that much...

12 posted on 08/21/2008 8:43:08 PM PDT by Norman Bates (Freepmail me to be part of the McCain List!)

[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Rastus

A pro-choice veep after all!

That's for today, tomorrow, I'm sure he'll say he's always been pro-life.

13 posted on 08/21/2008 8:43:16 PM PDT by dfwgator ( This tag blank until football season.)

[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Rastus

And a veep who favors socialized medicine. Oh goody!!

28 posted on 08/21/2008 8:47:17 PM PDT by nonliberal (Graduate: Curtis E. LeMay School of International Relations)

[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Rastus; All

A pro-choice veep after all!

Oh for crying out loud will you people who are fanatic about not having a pro choice VP please knock it off! We want a VP who will help win the election and who in case of the unthinkable could step in for the president. The VP will not determine the outcome of the abortion issue. The only way that will change is if a case will come before the SCOTUS and the Rowe V Wade decision would be overturned. Then the issue will go back to the state legislatures. Or we could ammend the US Constitution. That's not going to happen. I would sooner believe in big foot then that we could stop abortion in this way. I repeat for all you knuckle draggers out there;

The vice president will not have any impact on the abortion issue. For the record I'm pro-life but I also understand the mechanics of government. The major task before us is to win the election and keep the buffoon Obama out of the White House.

Get it?

51 posted on 08/21/2008 8:53:01 PM PDT by truthguy (Good intentions are not enough!)

[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Rastus

Was Reagan pro-choice when he was elected POTUS?

129 posted on 08/21/2008 9:16:45 PM PDT by Grunthor (A government big enough to give you what you want, is powerful enough to take it away)

[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Rastus

A pro-choice veep after all!

Nope.

445 posted on 08/21/2008 11:31:21 PM PDT by Mogollon ($5/gal Gas....Kick the Jacka$$es Out!)

[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Rastus