Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: trumandogz

How is science “based on” anything other than the scientific process? Can science be “based on” either creationism or evolution? If so, how do the two versions of science differ? What has evolution-based science given us that any other kind of science hasn’t?

Would you prefer that those who believe in a Creator just shut up and hide in a closet?


16 posted on 08/18/2008 10:20:55 AM PDT by Theo (Global warming "scientists." Pro-evolution "scientists." They're both wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Theo
Would you prefer that those who believe in a Creator just shut up and hide in a closet?

Simply because I accept Evolution as fact does not mean that I am an atheist. I also understand that the School House and Church House have two very different functions and I would prefer what is taught in your church not be taught in school.

Moreover, I would prefer that my kid's be educated with a science curriculum that will not bar them from being accepted in America's top universities.

23 posted on 08/18/2008 10:31:13 AM PDT by trumandogz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: Theo
Because you cannot prove that the old man in the sky exists, or that he had a hand in our creation. Those questions belong in theology and philosophy classes, NOT in the hard sciences.

Xians have been fighting a losing battle for over a century now. We've seen it all before. In the case of Kansas, whenever the irrationalists win control of the school board (usually in low turnout elections), they are usually thrown out within 2-4 years.

175 posted on 08/18/2008 3:54:43 PM PDT by Clemenza (No Comment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson