Same evidence, different conclusions, all based on the presupposed ideas of either God or no God.
From a creation viewpoint, you can see that there are kinds of organisms with certain information in their genome, enough information to produce dachshunds and jackals from a common “dog”. The “dog” kind, perhaps a wolf, has more genetic information than the poodle and is capable of reproducing the poodle through natural selection or breeding.
You cannot, however, take a slug and have it breed with other slugs to eventually become a bird.
This viewpoint is consistent with observed evidence, but cannot be accepted by those presupposed to believe otherwise.
Very well put. And not only can it not be accepted, its non-acceptance must be enforced at all costs. Which means Creationist and IDers will eventually have to use force to break the Darwinist stranglehold on science and create and even playingfield. To my mind, that will ultimately mean having a MASSIVE going out of business sale re: government science, thus returning science to the private sector, where it belongs.