To: MrB
Very well put. And not only can it not be accepted, its non-acceptance must be enforced at all costs. Which means Creationist and IDers will eventually have to use force to break the Darwinist stranglehold on science and create and even playingfield. To my mind, that will ultimately mean having a MASSIVE going out of business sale re: government science, thus returning science to the private sector, where it belongs.
To: GodGunsGuts
And not only can it not be accepted, its non-acceptance must be enforced at all costs. Because to do otherwise has WAY too many implications.
433 posted on
08/15/2008 12:16:56 PM PDT by
MrB
(You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
To: GodGunsGuts
Which means Creationist and IDers will eventually have to use force to break the Darwinist stranglehold on science and create and even playingfield. I don't believe even you could say something this stupid.
(Actually, I take it back. I do believe it.)
551 posted on
08/15/2008 7:39:14 PM PDT by
Coyoteman
(Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson