Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sleazy Men Should Be Publicly Shamed
Pajamas Media ^ | July 15, 2008 | Mary Grabar

Posted on 07/15/2008 7:52:36 AM PDT by AJKauf

Christie Brinkley was wise to air lying, cheating Peter Cook's misdeeds in public — more women should do so.

(Excerpt) Read more at pajamasmedia.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last

1 posted on 07/15/2008 7:52:36 AM PDT by AJKauf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: AJKauf

2 posted on 07/15/2008 7:55:02 AM PDT by rabscuttle385 (Bulls and bears make money. Pigs get slaughtered.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AJKauf
Stupid:
3 posted on 07/15/2008 7:55:24 AM PDT by MeanWestTexan (Kol Hakavod Mossad!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AJKauf
Christie Brinkley was wise to air lying, cheating Peter Cook's misdeeds in public — more women should do so.

No doubt that Peter Cook was a sleezy man but for Christie Brinkley to air all of that out in public so that she could "win" is atrocious. She picked the loser.

KIDS: "Thanks MOM!"

4 posted on 07/15/2008 7:55:33 AM PDT by frogjerk (Barry Hussein is Neville Chamberlain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AJKauf

I thought this is ironic, given that the previous article in the forum queue was about the “Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence” in San Francisco.

How to shame people in a shameless culture?


5 posted on 07/15/2008 7:59:39 AM PDT by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: frogjerk
KIDS: "Thanks MOM!"

MOM: Stop that ! Do you want to grow up to be like your father ?

6 posted on 07/15/2008 8:01:11 AM PDT by kbennkc (For those who have fought for it , freedom has a flavor the protected will never know)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: AJKauf; frogjerk

What she did was very smart....it certainly settled her case faster! Frog blames her for picking the scum.....but you never know someone until you live with them....are you saying they should of lived together first?


7 posted on 07/15/2008 8:01:34 AM PDT by Fawn (http://www.news3online.com/index.php?code=9F215xnf4M6Mv89d6mi5)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AJKauf

And Christie Brinkley is on what, divorce number FOUR? So she must be a real box of chocolates at home too. The follow-up article to this one should encourage married men to publicly air the runaway self-centered attitude problems of their wonderful wives too.


8 posted on 07/15/2008 8:01:35 AM PDT by raptor29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: frogjerk

Sleazy is sleazy...whats good for one is good for the other.

This penchant for making women innocent victims is disgusting....”more women should do it “ indeed.

My buncho’crap meter is redlining....


9 posted on 07/15/2008 8:01:36 AM PDT by Adder (typical bitter white person)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: AJKauf
Sleazy Men Should Be Publicly Shamed

This assumes of course that 1)people are aware of what "shame" is, 2) people are capable of feeling it and 3)that shame is a negative attribute and doesn't result in a perverse sort of adulation by the culture.

I'm not certain any of those assumptions is correct.

10 posted on 07/15/2008 8:02:14 AM PDT by ProfoundMan ( See my profile for hundreds of little freeper pics!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AJKauf
I enjoyed this bit:

This is what Norman Sheresky, Cook’s attorney, implied when he told the court, “For goodness sake: She’s on her fourth husband.” Well, yes, fourth husband — it is a bit harder to find a good man these days.

11 posted on 07/15/2008 8:02:51 AM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raptor29

He was a porn addict...a piece of dirt.


12 posted on 07/15/2008 8:03:04 AM PDT by Fawn (http://www.news3online.com/index.php?code=9F215xnf4M6Mv89d6mi5)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: frogjerk
She picked the loser.

But he is the one who broke his vows.

13 posted on 07/15/2008 8:03:16 AM PDT by Long Island Pete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: raptor29

First guy - can’t remember
Second guy - Billy Joel. She may have cheated on him.
Third guy - Taubman (or something like that). She found out he wasn’t as rich as he claimed and dumped his ass pronto.
Fourth guy - Started looking for something much younger.

Her track record is poor.

“After four divorces ... maybe it’s you?”


14 posted on 07/15/2008 8:04:19 AM PDT by SJSAMPLE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: frogjerk
It's the old adage: It Takes Two to Tango. She is on husband number 4. I think this says alot about her. I do. WOMEN, we MUST take responsibility in our lives and in our marriages. You cannot tell me that she didn't know in some way about his porn problem. They hinted during the trial that at times they used porn together. So she implicitly condoned the use. I would bet my last dollar that he wasn't getting much at home. She seems a tad self-centered.

Yes, I am judging, but I'm judging by the behavior she CHOSE to put out there in public during this court case, She was relishing it. It was totally creepy.

15 posted on 07/15/2008 8:06:08 AM PDT by Hildy (In success and in adversity, Tony Snow was a model of how a life should be lived. - Steve Forbes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Fawn

“He was a porn addict.”

OK, and maybe she was a completely self-centered, annoying, controlling jerk at home too. Those four divorces are evidence of some breakdowns in her personal makeup for sure, but she gets a pass because she is the woman. What a joke.


16 posted on 07/15/2008 8:11:40 AM PDT by raptor29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
“For goodness sake: She’s on her fourth husband.”

Serial polyandry.

17 posted on 07/15/2008 8:14:35 AM PDT by seowulf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: AJKauf

It is a dangerous road to revel in such scandal.

Years ago, there was a “People’s Court”-style TV show called “Divorce Court”. But unlike the ordered demeanor expected in other courts, this show highlighted the endless, cynical barrage of slanders found in divorce hearings.

It was appalling, more so because it reflected the reality of such shameful displays in real courts. Lawyers, as court officers, openly encouraged and coached spousal testimony that was far beyond the pale of even perjury. And unlike in legitimate courts, the judge was indifferent at best to the unsubstantiated lies, hate, and nonsensical attacks before him.

Mutual accusations of adultery, child abuse and molestation, drug and alcohol abuse, religious cultism, battery and threat of or even attempt of murder, theft and fraud, reckless endangerment, rape, and anything else that came to mind were de rigueur. The judge just ignored these vile accusations.

This is neither order nor justice, and any judge should be ashamed to tolerate such behavior. And if there was reasonable suspicion that the criminal elements had basis in fact, the judge should have suspended the hearing and summoned the police.


18 posted on 07/15/2008 8:15:40 AM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AJKauf

It’s not like women NEVER lie!


19 posted on 07/15/2008 8:20:20 AM PDT by unixfox (The 13th Amendment Abolished Slavery, The 16th Amendment Reinstated It !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AJKauf

Christie Brinkley made her name and her fortune by offering herself to the public as a piece of tasty eye candy. Then, after three failed marriages, she married a piece of male eye candy and expected him to be uninterested in other pieces of female eye candy who were younger than she now is. On what utopian planet did she think she lived?


20 posted on 07/15/2008 8:20:53 AM PDT by snarks_when_bored
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson