To: GraniteStateConservative
So the vegans were right?
We all gotta do tofu and bean sprouts after all?
2 posted on
07/08/2008 7:05:32 PM PDT by
sinanju
To: Soliton; forkinsocket; Coyoteman
fyi...
might be of interest ping.
3 posted on
07/08/2008 7:06:12 PM PDT by
GraniteStateConservative
(...He had committed no crime against America so I did not bring him here...-- Worst.President.Ever.)
To: GraniteStateConservative
4 posted on
07/08/2008 7:07:55 PM PDT by
savedbygrace
(SECURE THE BORDERS FIRST (I'M YELLING ON PURPOSE))
To: GraniteStateConservative
Oh, well. If I die a bit earlier, it was worth it.
6 posted on
07/08/2008 7:11:01 PM PDT by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: GraniteStateConservative
I knew that some whacked out liberal vegan would come up with something to prove eating red meat did us great harm. Just as they found a “gene” for being a queer now we have a molecule that gives us aids because we eat red meat. It’s seems strange to me that mostly gays and drug users get aids, does that meant the rest of us don’t eat meat?
8 posted on
07/08/2008 7:13:10 PM PDT by
calex59
To: GraniteStateConservative
I do quite a bit of technical reading - Pubmed Journals and abstracts, computer technical doc, arXiv stuff...
Roger Highfield explains more...
He didn’t explain squat to me! Anybody have the version that was written for non-stoners?
16 posted on
07/08/2008 7:29:16 PM PDT by
djf
(I don't believe in perpetual motion. Perpetual mutton, that's another thing entirely!)
To: GraniteStateConservative
More mush oozing out from between the ears of a professor
17 posted on
07/08/2008 7:29:34 PM PDT by
dalereed
(both)
To: GraniteStateConservative
If the mutation that kept us producing Neu5Ac rather than Neu5Gc helped shrug off a particular disease, it would have spread rapidly through the population. It is ironic that what may have protected our ancestors then could be responsible for much of the pain of their long-lived descendants.
That's the last paragraph. Well, if the mutation that kept us producing Neu5Ac helped shrug off a particular disease, then it would have spread rapidly through the population.
That doesn't make sense. A mutation, unlike an infection, doesn't just spread through a population.
Or how about this? Show us "a particular disease" that Neu5Ac might have helped our ancestors "shrug off". Somebody help me out here.
To: blam; StayAt HomeMother; Ernest_at_the_Beach; 1ofmanyfree; 21twelve; 24Karet; 2ndDivisionVet; ...
53 posted on
07/09/2008 9:25:50 AM PDT by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/_________________________Profile updated Friday, May 30, 2008)
55 posted on
07/09/2008 9:36:41 AM PDT by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/_________________________Profile updated Friday, May 30, 2008)
To: GraniteStateConservative
Something genetic in half the caucasians causes them to metabolize TB medication of some kind very slowly, which means they can take much lower doses for the same result.
56 posted on
07/09/2008 9:42:51 AM PDT by
RightWhale
(I will veto each and every beer)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson