Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Testing New Fighter Jet Is Successful (Russian SU-35)
Kommersant, Russia ^ | July 02, 2008

Posted on 07/02/2008 7:51:25 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki

Testing New Fighter Jet Is Successful

Sukhoi Design Bureau is testing a new multipurpose jet Su-35, and the tests are successful, test pilot Sergei Bogdan announced in the interview with the Military & Industrial Courier edition. Thirteen flights have been made, Bogdan specified.

Even the first flights of Su-35 confirmed the excellent flying and technical characteristics of the jet, and were completely in line with the stand tests.

Stability and controllability of Su-35 was evaluated at the altitude of up to 11,000 meters. The fighter was accelerated up to the speed corresponding to the Mach number of 1.3.

In terms of tactical and technical characteristics, Bogdan went on, a new jet leaves behind most of the foreign analogues, including F/A-18 Hornet, Mirage, Rafale, Gripen and Typhoon and is capable of opposing the G5 fighter F-22A Raptor.

The bulk production and supplies of new jets to the RF Air Force and overseas customers are slated for 2010-2011.


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Russia
KEYWORDS: aerospace; miltech; russia; su35; sukhoi
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last
Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

1 posted on 07/02/2008 7:51:25 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

What a gorgeous machine.

As an aside, I used to have an employee named Sergei “Serg” Bogdan. Must be a common name?


2 posted on 07/02/2008 7:56:50 AM PDT by papasmurf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Successful = It didn’t crash................


3 posted on 07/02/2008 7:57:20 AM PDT by Red Badger (If we drill deep enough, we can reach the Saudi oil fields from THIS side..........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
This test pilot claims after 13 flights this fighter can take on the F-22. Put down the vodka comrade, the next time you see a F-22 up close will be behind you as you eject and your parachute opens up.
4 posted on 07/02/2008 7:59:49 AM PDT by jrooney (Obama's mentor says God Da*n America. That explains Obama's refusal to put his hand over his heart.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: papasmurf
...is capable of opposing the G5 fighter F-22A Raptor.

............as a target...........

5 posted on 07/02/2008 8:01:20 AM PDT by Red Badger (If we drill deep enough, we can reach the Saudi oil fields from THIS side..........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Pretty airplane, but it doesn’t look particularly stealthy


6 posted on 07/02/2008 8:02:38 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 ("In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." -- George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki; jrooney; Red Badger

Marketing to gullible third-world AF procurement agents.

“Take on F-22” seems to be meaningless in over-the-horizon standoff warfare, doesn’t it?

With all the exposed armaments it must have the RCS of a metal hangar door.

It will be seen first => hull loss.


7 posted on 07/02/2008 8:05:10 AM PDT by sam_paine (X .................................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jrooney

Correction - he won’t even see the F22. He will just feel suddenly warm, then nothing.


8 posted on 07/02/2008 8:12:21 AM PDT by epluribus_2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: PapaBear3625
Pretty airplane, but it doesn’t look particularly stealthy

They use a special plasma to coat the jet and make it nearly invisible to radar...... I thought that was a big deal until someone I know that builds and maintains fighter jets told me we've been using the same thing on our fighters for a loooooong time.

9 posted on 07/02/2008 8:14:01 AM PDT by Fox_Mulder77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: sam_paine
Considering the F-22 has the radar cross section of a steel marble and the best Russian air search radar can't even begin to pick it up until it's about 15-20 miles out means that the SU-35 will be falling to the ground in pieces.
10 posted on 07/02/2008 8:15:32 AM PDT by aegiscg47
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

The original Su-35 was a derivative of the Su-27 and essentially a ground-based variant of the Su-33. While the official Russian Air Force designation for the aircraft remained the Su-27M, Sukhoi rechristened the model as the Su-35 in the hopes of attracting foreign customers.
The Su-35 design was largely identical to the Su-27 but incorporated the canards of the Su-33 and more powerful engines plus a new digital fly-by-wire control system. The Su-35 was also equipped with a new multi-mode radar, infrared detectors, and upgraded weapons. The Su-35 development program experienced many delays due to the collapse of the Soviet economy, and the Russian military ultimately chose not to purchase any. Sukhoi instead used the eleven prototypes as technology demonstrators to interest the export market in funding a production model.

The most likely chance for success appeared to be Brazil’s strong interest in co-producing the Su-35 that lasted for several years. Brazil required a replacement for its aging Mirage III fighters, and the Su-35 was considered the front-runner over the competing Mirage 2000, Gripen, and F-16. The Su-35 deal came quite close to being finalized in November 2004, but Brazil declined to sign over cost concerns. Russia later offered second-hand Su-27 aircraft as a cheaper alternative to the new-build Su-35, but Brazil opted to purchase twelve refurbished Mirage 2000 fighters from France instead.

The Brazilian decision appeared to have ended the Su-35 program once and for all since Sukhoi had little success finding other customers. Hopes were briefly revived in May 2006 when Venezuela announced interest in the Su-35, but the nation instead chose a variant of the Su-30. The move is largely politically-motivated given recent tensions between Venezuela and the United States over America’s ban on providing support for the Venezuelan F-16 fleet.

However, the Su-35 was revived at least in name in 2007 when Sukhoi announced the aircraft had entered production for the Russian Air Force. This incarnation is also a derivative of the Su-27 but does not appear to be directly related to the earlier Su-27M/Su-35 prototypes. The new Su-35, sometimes referred to as the Su-35BM, is instead an upgraded variant of the Su-30 series with a more powerful engine, an improved 2D thrust vectoring nozzle, and larger air intakes. The Su-35BM lacks the canards of the original Su-35 prototypes, although some sources indicate these can be fitted at customer request. Other upgrades include an improved radar, glass cockpit displays, compatibility with additional weapons, and incorporation of newer electronics.

Antiquated technology, only good against equally old aircraft. Cannon fodder for the F-22.


11 posted on 07/02/2008 8:35:30 AM PDT by LBJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jrooney
the next time you see a F-22 up close will be behind you as you eject and your parachute opens up.

While the F-22 pilot is taking souvenir photos...

12 posted on 07/02/2008 9:06:47 AM PDT by TLI ( ITINERIS IMPENDEO VALHALLA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: PapaBear3625
Pretty airplane, but it doesn’t look particularly stealthy

Unless it has plasma stealth.

13 posted on 07/02/2008 9:19:18 AM PDT by Thunder90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: LBJay
Antiquated technology, only good against equally old aircraft. Cannon fodder for the F-22.

Given the recent events at DoD and the USAF command shakeup, we won't have enough F-22s to make a difference anyway, so all it has to do is be able to beat aging, G-limited F-15Cs.

14 posted on 07/02/2008 9:24:23 AM PDT by Yo-Yo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

>>capable of opposing the . . .F-22A Raptor<<

Pardon me, not to be rude, but. . . bwahahahahahahahahahah.

(There, I feel much better)


15 posted on 07/02/2008 9:25:46 AM PDT by Hulka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fox_Mulder77

LOL. . . .good one. . . .funny


16 posted on 07/02/2008 9:26:58 AM PDT by Hulka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Hulka; Thunder90; sukhoi-30mki; All
Stealth design SU-35 aircraft

Plasma coating stealth.

17 posted on 07/02/2008 10:09:35 AM PDT by Fox_Mulder77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

They haven’t taken it to the Paris Air Show to demo the ejection seat yet.


18 posted on 07/02/2008 10:12:11 AM PDT by bmwcyle (If God wanted us to be Socialist, Karl Marx would have been born in America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Fox_Mulder77
A little late and a lot wrong with “plasma coating.”

Nifty name, though, “plasma stealth,” sounds so. . . .what. . . .oh yeah, “X-File”-ish.

Link to the original article please, not some promo site dedicated to disinformation-—and from 2004? Four years ago? A little more recent would be nice.

They simply do not have the technology because “plasma” was found ineffective.

But hey, knock themselves out trying to make a whale of a metal jet “stealthy. They could do much better by a few engineering modifications.

19 posted on 07/02/2008 10:39:41 AM PDT by Hulka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Hulka

LOLOL!! Not saying plasma stealth is all that great. Just saying it exists, and we’ve been using it on all of our fighters. In fact, we use spray cans of the stuff on our F-18’s right now. The guys on the carriers go out and spray it on like spray paint.

But don’t believe me. Keep thinking I’m talking about x-files or something. HEHE! :-D


20 posted on 07/02/2008 10:50:01 AM PDT by Fox_Mulder77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson