Posted on 06/14/2008 4:51:35 PM PDT by bruinbirdman
“Turd burglars.”
That’s what I was hoping.
Traditional Anglican ping, continued in memory of its founder Arlin Adams.
FReepmail Huber or sionnsar if you want on or off this moderately high-volume ping list (sometimes 3-9 pings/day).
This list is pinged by Huber and sionnsar.
Resource for Traditional Anglicans: http://trad-anglican.faithweb.com
Humor: The Anglican Blue
Speak the truth in love. Eph 4:15
Sorry to read about this. I think over in the US, this would be called “pornography.” However, our Anglican church is not much better, unfortunately. :-(
Just re-read: the decadent priests ARE Anglican. That church is going to Hell in a handbasket on BOTH sides of the Pond!
Very sad. I visited this church in 2005, I think it was. Beautiful... but dead, if it allowed this.
How come. Are gay activits getting your petition signatures thrown out?
Well, I had to look up “coprophilia.” I only wish I didn’t.
He argued that it was not a wedding but a blessing and that he was not “offering” blessing services
______________________________________
Sounds more like a mormon “spiritual wedding”
a decision seen as blasphemous by conservatives.
Someone else objects and He is not one to be mocked.
__________________________________________
He calls it an abomination..
activits = activists (d-urrrrrr!)
I dunno. I suspect that, unlike the “mainstream” Anglican clergy, the Mormons are still into that whole backward “man-woman” thing...
“Butt buddies.”
"Mainstream" only in the rapidly-diminishing northern churches, not in the vast majority of Anglican churches.
” male priests “
If you are a queer you are not a priest.
Homosexual “marriage” may come, however, despite the laws.... there is nothing to say we have to recognize it as individuals.
Just as it was moral to defy the morally indefensible segregation laws, it is also moral to simply refuse to honor homosexual “unions” with the dignity of even the term marriage....let alone it’s rights.
Will people get persecuted by law? Of course, but that is what it will take to change things.
I for one will never recognize sexual perverts’ “unions” as marriage.
I believe there are millions like me. I hope they will stand up and be counted—even if jailed—in California now.
I also believe there are some states, especially in the bible belt which simply will not recognize gay “marriage” even if ordered to do so by the Supreme Court.
Maybe this instance will be the one where some political leaders some where will finally stand up to judicial tyranny and defy it.
God will always have a Remnant.
I meant the quoted material.
They eat and drink in celebration of their own damnation! It is truly frightening to think of what is coming, but it’s not like we haven’t been warned. God is patient, but He is also holy.
johniegrad: “Legalistic parsing that Bill Clinton would admire.”
Certainly, but their battle is with the Lord not man. No manner of artful talk, rationalization, or appeals to emotion hold sway over the Lord. He is sovereign in a way that is completely and totally beyond the feeble power of man. In fact, even the word “feeble” does not accurately portray the power of man compared to God. We have none.
They can rationalize their heresy any way they wish, but they might as well argue with the sea for the good it will do them.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.