Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Brace yourselves.
1 posted on 05/27/2008 7:51:40 AM PDT by Erik Latranyi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Erik Latranyi

Just in time for Obama to denounce the 2nd Amendment before the general election.


2 posted on 05/27/2008 7:53:24 AM PDT by Always Right (Was it over when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Erik Latranyi

I’m for the death penalty for child rapists.

This will be interesting.


5 posted on 05/27/2008 8:07:51 AM PDT by ConservativeMind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Erik Latranyi

Waiting with baited breath, on the edge of my seat, and fingers crossed that the second amendment is upheld today.


7 posted on 05/27/2008 8:10:13 AM PDT by IMissPresidentReagan ("If we were dog food, they'd take us off the shelf." Rep. Tom Davis on the "Republican Brand")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Erik Latranyi

Yeah? Well I know a place where the Constitution doesn’t matter (Supreme Court.)


9 posted on 05/27/2008 8:25:48 AM PDT by Tzimisce (How Would Mohammed Vote? Hillary for President!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Erik Latranyi

Summary of actions Tuesday by the Supreme Court

By The Associated Press – 34 minutes ago

On Tuesday, the Supreme Court:

_Ruled that workers who face retaliation after complaining about race discrimination may sue their employers.

_Declared that a major anti-age bias law protects federal employees who faced retaliation after complaining about discrimination.

_Said Alabama's governor did not need advance approval from the federal government to fill a county commission vacancy with a fellow Republican appointee.

_Refused to step into the case of former Illinois Gov. George Ryan, who was convicted of steering contracts, tax fraud, misuse of tax dollars and state workers, and killing a bribery investigation.


10 posted on 05/27/2008 8:26:15 AM PDT by michigander (When the people find that they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Erik Latranyi

I may be ignorant about the duration of SCOTUS decision-making, but it seems to me that a case, that is clearly defined in the Constitution, should be a no-brainer for the court. Why is it taking so long? Are they looking for ways to justify government “infringement”??


14 posted on 05/27/2008 8:48:31 AM PDT by ROLF of the HILL COUNTRY ( The Constitution needs No interpreting, only APPLICATION!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Erik Latranyi
We need some relevant eye candy on this thread.

I know it's not quite up to snuff for the impressive arsenals of other FReepers...

But gimme a break I live in New York.


16 posted on 05/27/2008 9:08:04 AM PDT by andyandval
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Erik Latranyi

I predict the SC says, “The 2nd A. protects INDIVIDUAL rights, BUT... Blah, blah, blah, the DC law, and every other gun law in the country stands.” Pray to God I’m wrong, because I do.


26 posted on 05/27/2008 9:35:47 AM PDT by Mr. Pumblechook
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Joe Brower

new to banglist...


27 posted on 05/27/2008 9:38:02 AM PDT by Gilbo_3 (Trust in the Lord...vote yer conscience...=...LiveFReeOr Die...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Erik Latranyi

Wow, some really powerful cases coming up. Here’s hoping some members of the Supreme Court remember to brush up on the Constitution before some of these rulings - if they decide to hear them.


32 posted on 05/27/2008 9:46:03 AM PDT by LibertyRocks (The LibertyRocks Blog - http://libertyrocks.wordpress.com & http://www.LibertyRocks.us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Erik Latranyi

We need the USSC to protect us from democrats like rarely before. Please do the right thing guys.


41 posted on 05/27/2008 10:07:11 AM PDT by MartinStyles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Erik Latranyi
Major cases still undecided include the rights of detainees at Guantanamo Bay, the ban on handguns in Washington, D.C., and whether people convicted of raping children can be given the death penalty.

If your allegiance is questionable, then likewise is everything else. THESE ARE OBVIOUS CALLS, JUSTICES!
67 posted on 05/27/2008 11:42:19 AM PDT by The Spirit Of Allegiance (Public Employees: Honor Your Oaths! Defend the Constitution from Enemies--Foreign and Domestic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Erik Latranyi
Major cases still undecided include the rights of detainees at Guantanamo Bay, the ban on handguns in Washington, D.C., and whether people convicted of raping children can be given the death penalty.

Let me sum up my platform.

Detainees at Guantanamo Bay MUST be granted rights equal to those granted to U.S. personnel (including contractors) by Al Quada and Taliban forces.

All U.S. Citizens residing in the D.C. area, if otherwise qualified to carry, are compelled to attend a firearms safety course and upon successful completion will be given their choice of a Beretta 9mm or a Colt 357 Magnum Revolver.

Persons convicted of actual child rape and determined guilty beyond reasonable doubt, excluding certain instances of "statutory rape" to whit an 18 year old boy with his willing 17 year old girl friend are caught in the act of "the horizontal boogie," shall be taken to an area adjacent to the scene of his crime where he or she shall be placed under the tender ministrations of the victims parents and/or other family member(s), guardian(s), etc, for a period not less then five minutes and not more than one hour. Any remaining residue of the perpetrator shall be burned down to ash which will be deposited in the nearest municipal land fill.

Vote for the Grizzled Party in 08.

126 posted on 05/27/2008 7:54:15 PM PDT by Grizzled Bear ("Does not play well with others.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Erik Latranyi

~ bump ~


134 posted on 05/27/2008 10:55:57 PM PDT by Liberty Valance (Keep a simple manner for a happy life)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem; DaveLoneRanger
Ping!
137 posted on 05/27/2008 11:33:44 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/_______________________Profile updated Monday, April 28, 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Erik Latranyi
A long read. But great and persuasive.

Respondent's brief in D.C. v. Heller

142 posted on 05/28/2008 3:54:00 AM PDT by andyandval
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Erik Latranyi

They’d better get the 2nd Amendment one right...


211 posted on 05/28/2008 9:17:02 PM PDT by Redbob (WWJBD - "What Would Jack Bauer Do?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson