Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US unveils deals with Saudi on nuclear power, oil protection (US to give Saudis Enriched Uranium!)
AFP / Yahoo News ^ | 5-16-08 | AFP

Posted on 05/16/2008 11:02:41 AM PDT by SeafoodGumbo

RIYADH (AFP) - The White House announced major new cooperation agreements with Saudi Arabia on Friday as US President George W. Bush made his second visit to the oil superpower this year.

The agreements cover cooperation on civil nuclear power and protecting the kingdom's oil infrastructure which has come under attack by Islamist militants.

"The Saudis bear a special responsibility for protecting key energy facilities of global importance and the world benefits from their abundant energy supplies," a White House statement said.

"Our global economy depends greatly on Saudi Arabian energy. The United States has a keen interest in helping the Saudis protect their energy infrastructure against terrorism, as demonstrated by the unsuccessful terrorist attack against the kingdom's Abqaiq plants in February 2006," it said.

"To this end, the United States and Saudi Arabia have agreed to cooperate in safeguarding the kingdom's energy resources by protecting key infrastructure, enhancing Saudi border security, and meeting Saudi Arabia's expanding energy needs in an environmentally responsible manner."

Saudi Arabia sits on around a quarter of the world's oil reserves and is by far its biggest producer with an output of some nine million barrerls per day.

The White House said Washington and Riyadh were also to sign an agreement on nuclear cooperation that would clear the way for Saudi Arabia to receive enriched uranium for its reactors, without the need to master the fuel nuclear cycle itself as Iran has done.

"This agreement will pave the way for Saudi Arabia's access to safe, reliable fuel sources for energy reactors and demonstrate Saudi leadership as a positive non-proliferation model for the region," it said.

Washington charges that Iran's nuclear programme is cover for a drive to develop an atomic weapon, a charge denied by Tehran.

Uranium enrichment, the process which can produce for fuel for nuclear power stations -- or, in highly extended form, the fissile core of an atomic bomb -- lies at the centre of US concerns.



TOPICS: Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: bush; oil; saudiarabia; terrorism; uranium; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last
Via LGF

Please call your Senators and Reps about this, right now!

1 posted on 05/16/2008 11:02:42 AM PDT by SeafoodGumbo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeafoodGumbo

They can make this deal, but they can’t make a deal to increase oil production. Amazing.


2 posted on 05/16/2008 11:06:49 AM PDT by sappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeafoodGumbo

They can make this deal, but they can’t make a deal to increase oil production. Amazing.


3 posted on 05/16/2008 11:06:52 AM PDT by sappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeafoodGumbo

So, where is our $20 brl crude? On the way, right?


4 posted on 05/16/2008 11:07:07 AM PDT by TLI ( ITINERIS IMPENDEO VALHALLA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeafoodGumbo

In his own bizzare way Michael Moore was right.

GWB is the Saudi’s beyotch


5 posted on 05/16/2008 11:07:52 AM PDT by misterrob (Obama-Does America Need Another Jimmy Carter?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeafoodGumbo
by far its biggest producer with an output of some nine million barrerls per day.

USA produces eight million barrels per day. Is one million barrels a day 'by far?'

6 posted on 05/16/2008 11:08:24 AM PDT by RightWhale (You are reading this now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: misterrob

We are all the Saudi’s Beatch.


7 posted on 05/16/2008 11:09:04 AM PDT by Georgia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SeafoodGumbo

I’ve just lost the remaining respect that I had for GWB. WTF!?!?!?!?!

If he tries to move forward with this, I say impeach him.


8 posted on 05/16/2008 11:09:56 AM PDT by NoKoolAidforMe (One Nation-Under God. There, I said it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: misterrob
In his own bizzare way Michael Moore was right.

I fully agree and thought that at the time.

9 posted on 05/16/2008 11:11:16 AM PDT by steve86 (Acerbic by nature, not nurture™)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SeafoodGumbo

Unbelievable


10 posted on 05/16/2008 11:12:36 AM PDT by Domandred (McCain's 'R' is a typo that has never been corrected)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sappy

???????????????????????????

Hope this gets stopped dead in its tracks in Congress.

Time to pull a Dubai Port/Harrietmeir/McCain-Kennedy Spanking again.


11 posted on 05/16/2008 11:13:13 AM PDT by ZULU (Non nobis, non nobis Domine, sed nomini tuo da gloriam. God, guts and guns made America great.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NoKoolAidforMe

If he goes for this he has lost his last supporter in Florida also. If this is okay by Congress I say Impeach the whole lot of them


12 posted on 05/16/2008 11:14:04 AM PDT by straps (Off the coast of Florida is enough oil and natural gas to take care of us. Period)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SeafoodGumbo
 "This agreement will pave the way for Saudi Arabia's access to safe, reliable fuel sources for energy reactors and demonstrate Saudi leadership as a positive non-proliferation model for the region,"

I thought the administration's argument against Iran's use of nuclear energy was that they didn't need it.  Doesn't this same position have even MORE validity with Saudi Arabia.

It sounds to me like the United States is giving the Saudi's the technology to defend themselves with nuclear weapons.

13 posted on 05/16/2008 11:14:41 AM PDT by HawaiianGecko
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeafoodGumbo

This is the US answer to the Iranian nuke threat. Give nuclear technology to Iran’s neighbors.


14 posted on 05/16/2008 11:15:27 AM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeafoodGumbo

Saudi’s have a long history of increasing production but announcing that they will not increase pumping. Somehting was recieved for this deal and it is probably more oil.


15 posted on 05/16/2008 11:16:02 AM PDT by TexanToTheCore (If it ain't Rugby or Bullriding, it's for girls.........................................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeafoodGumbo

Nobody answers Nelsons line from florida


16 posted on 05/16/2008 11:17:40 AM PDT by straps (Off the coast of Florida is enough oil and natural gas to take care of us. Period)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NoKoolAidforMe

During the 2004 elections this is exactly what Kerry wanted to offer the Iranians if it stopped them from enriching their own uranium.

For the President to offer this it has to mean they are starting a nuclear program for enrichment to stay up with Iran, this is exactly what was feared in the M.E., and arms race.


17 posted on 05/16/2008 11:18:36 AM PDT by Abathar (Proudly posting without reading the article carefully since 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SeafoodGumbo

I’m a bit lost here. The Bush administration states that Iran has no legitimate use for nuclear power because of all of the oil and natural gas that can be used for electric generation. And this is different how?


18 posted on 05/16/2008 11:19:46 AM PDT by Toskrin (Bringing you global cooling since 1999)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeafoodGumbo
Saudis see no reason to raise oil production now Yahoo ^ | May 16, 2008 | Jennifer Loven

Posted on Friday, May 16, 2008 11:14:46 AM by Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh

RIYADH, Saudi Arabia - Saudi Arabian leaders made clear Friday they see no reason to increase oil production until their customers demand it, apparently rebuffing President Bush amid soaring U.S. gasoline prices.

19 posted on 05/16/2008 11:20:04 AM PDT by TLI ( ITINERIS IMPENDEO VALHALLA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sappy

And we can agree to build nuclear reactors in the middle east, but not in the Midwest.


20 posted on 05/16/2008 11:20:04 AM PDT by MrB (You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson