Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Childers wins 1st District for Democrats (Dem wins Mississippi Special Election)
Northeast Mississippi Daily Journal ^ | 5/13/2008 | Associated Press

Posted on 05/13/2008 7:27:22 PM PDT by Alter Kaker

Travis Childers, elected U.S. House, District 1, Mississippi. [Note: This is an AP bulletin - nothing follows]


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Mississippi
KEYWORDS: 110th; childers; davis; mi2008; mississippi; travischilders
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 221-225 next last
To: bill1952

“When an agenda is being pursued, that agenda’s aims trump mere elections. - and this is why it has trumped Conservatives by nominating a McCain; a party maverick to be the new standard bearer for the GOP!”

As far as that I’d just say natural cause and effect. Had Bush been wildly popular Romney would’ve been nominated.


141 posted on 05/13/2008 8:54:27 PM PDT by Norman Bates (Freepmail me to be part of the McCain List!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: RKB-AFG

“It wasn’t until Iraq turn into a total snake pit, $4 gasoline, increased unemployment, the beginning of a recession, sub-prime mortgage-crises, out-of-control spending,”

And EVERY SINGLE ONE of these issues has been brought us by DEMOCRAT POLICIES...

Bush averted the recission that was already coming BEFORE 9/11


142 posted on 05/13/2008 8:54:30 PM PDT by tcrlaf (VOTE DEMOCRAT-You'll look great in a Burka!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: Coldwater Creek

Last two years, the democrats. Perception - Bush and the Republicans. Perception is reality unless it is changed with good communications and clear plans. That hasn’t happening. “You suck” doesn’t get us anywhere.


143 posted on 05/13/2008 8:54:46 PM PDT by Darren McCarty (Just when I thought I was out, they pull me back in - Michael Corleone)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: ClarenceThomasfan
#1 it was in Mississippi not Michigan. #2 This was a special election and his operation didn't start until after Mississippi already had their primary so there was not a Republican cross over effect at all.

You don't like Rush, facts be damned.
144 posted on 05/13/2008 8:54:57 PM PDT by jps098
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Captain Kirk

You are hightlight precisely the problem. You win by voting for a winner not writing in.


145 posted on 05/13/2008 8:55:11 PM PDT by Norman Bates (Freepmail me to be part of the McCain List!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: paudio

The Democrat was probably an anti-Iraq war conservative/moderate like Webb. That will trump a pro-Iraq war/big government Republican every time.


146 posted on 05/13/2008 8:56:51 PM PDT by Captain Kirk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: RKB-AFG
am afraid the decline of the Bush presidency started even before that.

It started when he misread a 51% victory over a horrible democrat candidate as a mandate. No president has had a mandate since MAYBE Reagan, and even he had to deal with a democrat congress.

It accellerated when there was no Plan B or any communication and plans from Bush - or anyone else for that matter. I don't blame this strictly on Bush - and in fact blame it more on the congressional leadership for not picking up the slack. Followers aren't respected outside of the beltway.

147 posted on 05/13/2008 8:57:56 PM PDT by Darren McCarty (Just when I thought I was out, they pull me back in - Michael Corleone)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: bill1952

You’re welcome. I still view McCain as a logical conclusion. Had we nominated Romney or Huckabee we’d be down double digits at this point. Thankfully McCain is keeping it close nationally and in key swing states. I’m still hopeful because we’ve yet to hit Obama over a single piece of his far left voting past.


148 posted on 05/13/2008 8:58:04 PM PDT by Norman Bates (Freepmail me to be part of the McCain List!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: yongin

I think you are right...moderate McCain has a chance to beat B.H. Obama. (Only a chance...maybe not even a good chance...but a chance).

Sadly, Huckabee, Romney, F. Thompson, Brownback, or whoever would be blown out by Obama.

That is how toxic the Republican brand label has become. Bush has ran the party into the ground, worst than Clinton did to the Democrats in 1994.


149 posted on 05/13/2008 8:58:12 PM PDT by RKB-AFG (1133)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: Norman Bates

McCain (who is on the ballot) = Don Quixote. A rose by any other name.


150 posted on 05/13/2008 8:58:19 PM PDT by Captain Kirk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: Norman Bates

McCain (who is on the ballot) = Don Quixote. A rose by any other name.


151 posted on 05/13/2008 8:58:24 PM PDT by Captain Kirk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: Norman Bates

I find that difficult to believe considering Boston has over 130 liberal Colleges and Universities, but I’ll take your word for it because most of your neighbors likely work for the Government in one form or another.
“Baltimore is only a typically Democratic run (trashed by liberals) city.
We have the Queers destroying our State Constitution in the name of Civil Rights of all things!

I have children, I will never stop fighting the insanity.


152 posted on 05/13/2008 8:58:40 PM PDT by acapesket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: RKB-AFG
This is pretty much the way it looked in the seventies. Nixon only cared about himself, so nobody was there to help him at the end. And he just kept giving the Democrats what they wanted until they chased him out. Then the Dems ran against his ghost in the fall of 74, and Carter ran against the Rino’s and his ghost in 1976. Dems are gonna try to run against Bush's ghost for a while too. Bank on it.

Our people always run the minute they see Democrat fire. You saw how that worked when a Democrat president got nailed with something. They made us into the bad guys. They don't fight fair. It's politics. We are dealing with absolute sociopaths on the other side and our people either don't believe in our fight or don't have the guts to fight.

Doesn't matter. Either way, we lose.

153 posted on 05/13/2008 8:58:53 PM PDT by Luke21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: Captain Kirk

I expect all true conservatives will show up at their local republican headquarters on Nov 5, after McNutt’s defeat, and demand that the state GOP’s clean out the the DC republicans, lot, stock, and barrel. I will be there. My local republicans as well as state hdq know that this must be done and but we are locked in until the Nov defeat.


154 posted on 05/13/2008 8:58:53 PM PDT by brydic1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: Norman Bates
Probably lost because they brought in Cheney. I doubt Bush & Co. has an above 50% approval in any US state. Not in Texas. Not anywhere.

The approval rating of congress is lower than Bush's.

155 posted on 05/13/2008 8:59:23 PM PDT by Big Horn (I am bitter, I just want to eat my waffle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Darren McCarty

True but worse yet when he decided to spend his “political capital” on something he did virtually no campaigning on in 2004 - private accounts for health.


156 posted on 05/13/2008 9:00:09 PM PDT by Norman Bates (Freepmail me to be part of the McCain List!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: Norman Bates

I agree that a standard conservative would fail however, The best way to trump the Democrats this year is not be running a grumpy erratic “maverick” but an anti-Iraq War/pro-small government conservative like Ron Paul. McCain is doomed.


157 posted on 05/13/2008 9:02:05 PM PDT by Captain Kirk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: tcrlaf

Exempt for out of control spending (which is Bush, Frist, Hastert’s fault as much as the Democrats), I agree with you....however, most voters do not see it that way.


158 posted on 05/13/2008 9:02:13 PM PDT by RKB-AFG (1133)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: acapesket

Most of my neighbors are dyed in the wool 10th generation Democrats or welfare queens. Go far enough and you’ll run into the latte-sipping uber-liberal Bostonian types in midtown.


159 posted on 05/13/2008 9:02:43 PM PDT by Norman Bates (Freepmail me to be part of the McCain List!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: Captain Kirk

I don’t want an anti-Iraq I want to win Iraq. But now. Enough. This war should’ve been over in ‘05. We shouldn’t still be fighting in Afghanistan either. Nevermind that Bush has spent us into near oblivion. Sorry, it’s not my night...


160 posted on 05/13/2008 9:04:14 PM PDT by Norman Bates (Freepmail me to be part of the McCain List!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 221-225 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson