Skip to comments.
Chattanooga: Hikers packing concealed heat
timesfreepress.com ^
| May 5, 2008
| Joan Garrett
Posted on 05/07/2008 8:01:41 AM PDT by neverdem
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-78 next last
To: opus86
I take a .38 with me when I go to Kansas City!
Carolyn
41
posted on
05/07/2008 9:22:37 AM PDT
by
CDHart
("It's too late to work within the system and too early to shoot the b@#$%^&s."--Claire Wolfe)
To: kbennkc
small bag of trail mix on the bayonet . Lol!
42
posted on
05/07/2008 9:31:16 AM PDT
by
budwiesest
("Next penguin craps on my jet is gonna get it"..A. Gore)
To: neverdem
I started hiking in the Cherokee National Forest and on the trail back in the early 70’s. I always carried a firearm with me even where I wasn’t supposed to. It can be dangerous up there.
43
posted on
05/07/2008 9:33:38 AM PDT
by
dljordan
To: VOA
To: Hiddigeigei
45
posted on
05/07/2008 9:39:15 AM PDT
by
ltc8k6
To: Billthedrill
When is the barbecue ?
46
posted on
05/07/2008 9:40:45 AM PDT
by
kbennkc
(For those who have fought for it , freedom has a flavor the protected will never know)
To: VOA
Handguns weighing five to 10 pounds are comparatively heavy, and if they are buried in a backpack out of sight it could take a hiker too long to reach one in an emergency, he said.Then my 2-1/4lb .475Linebaugh in a drop-leg holster should be just what the Dr. ordered.
47
posted on
05/07/2008 9:54:52 AM PDT
by
P8riot
(I carry a gun because I can't carry a cop.)
To: neverdem
There are federal laws in CA that allow you to carry a weapon
"going to and from" fishing. As long as you have a fishing license.
It's the work around when I pan for gold, I just carry a pocket fisherman
and a license.
48
posted on
05/07/2008 9:57:35 AM PDT
by
MaxMax
(It's not the politics I despise, It's the politicians for being so stupid..)
To: cyclotic; All
“The USNPS is exactly correct in allowing concealed carry in our parks”
Here’s a very good reason:
Your parks and national forests are being devastated by armed Mexican drug cartels growing pot farms on thousands of acres every year. They destroy the habitat for miles around them and the garbage....take a look.
http://towncriernews.blogspot.com/search?q=invasion+800+miles
49
posted on
05/07/2008 10:27:42 AM PDT
by
AuntB
(Vote Obama! ..........Because it's hard to blame 'the man' when you are the 'man'.... Wanda Sikes)
To: hemogoblin
Well, depending on how old it is, it may be marked for “9mm Kurz.” - aka .380 ACP.
50
posted on
05/07/2008 10:40:53 AM PDT
by
Spktyr
(Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
To: neverdem
51
posted on
05/07/2008 11:13:26 AM PDT
by
Mr. Silverback
(It's not conservative to accept an inept Commander-in-Chief in a time of war. Back Mac.)
To: Alter Kaker
“Sorry, but a 9mm handgun isn’t going to do much to deter an angry mama bear.”
What about a .357 Magnum? I prefer revolvers...they’re point and click. :)
To: Mr. Silverback
53
posted on
05/07/2008 11:33:20 AM PDT
by
AppyPappy
(If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
To: mbynack
>I've also encountered Black Bears in the Smoky Mountain Park. Shortly after our visit a woman was killed by a bear.
Almost in another world back in the late 60s, but my first hike ever was when I was 14 or 15 in Glacier National Park, where I hiked the Trout Lake trail.
I saw exactly what bears can do to people there. - In fact, I even saw that bear up front and personal.
- Scared me senseless.
I swore at that young age never again to hike long distances without being well armed.
and I never have.
54
posted on
05/07/2008 12:05:45 PM PDT
by
bill1952
(I will vote for McCain if he resigns his Senate seat before this election.)
To: neverdem
I usually carry my .357 or .44 mag on the trail. A little more punch, no matter if the violating critter is 2 or 4 legged.
55
posted on
05/07/2008 12:27:16 PM PDT
by
Ghengis
(Of course freedom is free. If it wasn't, it would be called expensivedom. ~Cindy Sheehan 11/11/06)
To: Ghengis
56
posted on
05/07/2008 12:30:34 PM PDT
by
AppyPappy
(If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
To: Wally_Kalbacken
>>>>I never saw a woman that attractive on or near the trail.
Lots of babettes in the White Mountains of NH.
57
posted on
05/07/2008 12:36:21 PM PDT
by
angkor
To: SJackson
I dont know all the laws for every state, but I believe the majority now have castle doctrine, which means in your place of domicile, including your camp ground, possession of a gun for self protection is legal. In CA, your allowed to “transport” to and from places where you can legally possess, but most places require that “transport” to be with the gun unloaded and inaccessible (in the backpack?).
Otherwise, your correct, you would need a permit to carry the loaded gun while hiking on the trail. That could be a concealed carry permit, or a hunting license. You might have to convince the ranger your 9mm is an appropriate hunting gun.
58
posted on
05/07/2008 12:38:22 PM PDT
by
Magnum44
(Terrorism is a disease, precise application of superior force is the ONLY cure)
To: ArrogantBustard
I’ve had friends encounter drunken louts on the A-T in spots where it intersects with favorite rural “drinking spots”.
I personally encountered some guys - one with a Remington bolt action rifle - way deep in the White Mountains and they weren’t hunters or hikers, not dressed for it (cowboy boots!). No packs, no water, nothing. That’s when I decided to pack discreetly while hiking (I was with my girlfriend).
Just outside Dolly Sodds in WV, we were chased off private property by some psychotic hillbilly with a rifle, after the owner had already given us permission to camp there for just the night. He fired several shots at us as we were leaving.
In Abiqui, NM I was compelled to display my loaded and cocked Marlin 1894s to some dudes in a van who were brazenly checking out every campsite in this small Forest Service campground. They finally got the message and left post haste.
Bears? Don’t ask. But some friends were stuck on the top of a large boulder for a good 30 minutes while keeping a black bear at bay.
It’s legal to open carry in most National **Forests**, and where it isn’t I’ll make my own decision.
59
posted on
05/07/2008 12:49:29 PM PDT
by
angkor
To: Magnum44
I dont know all the laws for every state, but I believe the majority now have castle doctrine, which means in your place of domicile, including your camp ground, possession of a gun for self protection is legal. In CA, your allowed to transport to and from places where you can legally possess, but most places require that transport to be with the gun unloaded and inaccessible (in the backpack?).I was thinking more of hiking than at ones campsite, which would put local transport regulations into play. Which in most places would mean at best cased, unloaded and in the pack. Unless open carry is legal. Obviously people need to check to local laws, which is why imo consistant laws on federal land would be nice, but I don't think castle doctrine overrides local gun laws. For example while Illinois doesn't have a distinct "castle doctrine" law, deadly force is authorized to prevent bodily harm, that doesn't override local handgun bans, for example. Or state ownership licensing.
60
posted on
05/07/2008 1:01:23 PM PDT
by
SJackson
(I'm a lawyer, Barack is a lawyer, all our friends are lawyers, Michelle O.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-78 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson