Steyn puts a fork in Michelle Obama, and oh does it leave a mark.
On or off, FReepmail or Ping me.
Cheers,
knewshound
knewshounds blog
Posted on 04/25/2008 1:52:01 AM PDT by Rummyfan
Michelle, ma belle: These are words that go together well. She looks fabulous, like a presidential spouse out of some dream movie — glossy hair, triple strand of pearls, vaguely retro suits that subtly remind you she’d be the most glamorous first lady since Jackie Kennedy.
Michelle, “fear,” “cynicism”: These are words that go together more problematically. Mrs. Obama is most famous for declaring, about her husband’s candidacy, that “for the first time in my adult lifetime I’m really proud of my country.” Just a throwaway line reflecting no more than the narcissism and self-absorption required to mount a presidential campaign in the 21st century? Possibly — were it not for the fact that almost every time the candidate’s wife speaks extemporaneously she seems to offer some bon mot consistent with that bleak assessment.
‘YOU MUST WORK,’ DECLARES DEAR LEADER And when she stops looking back across the final grim despairing decades of the 20th century (“Life for regular folks has gotten worse over the course of my lifetime”) and contemplates the sunlit uplands of the new utopia, it doesn’t, tonally, get any cheerier. Pretend for a moment that the name of the candidate had been excised from the following remarks. Would it seem part of the natural discourse of a constitutional republic of citizen legislators? Or does it sound more appropriate to the leadership cult of Basketkhazia or some other one-man stan?
“[INSERT NAME OF MESSIANIC LEADER HERE] will require you to work. He is going to demand that you shed your cynicism. That you put down your divisions. That you come out of your isolation, that you move out of your comfort zone. That you push yourselves to be better. And that you engage. [LEADER] will never allow you to go back to your lives as usual, uninvolved, uninformed.”
The above words were his wife’s vision of life under the administration of Barack Obama, the transformative presidential candidate offering change you can believe in — or else. I hate to sound like I’m walled up in the Shed of Cynicism, but the constitutional right to be “uninvolved” and “uninformed” is one of the most precious, at least if the alternative is being “required” to work at coming out of your isolation and engaging with fellow members of the uninvolved, uninformed masses as we push ourselves to move out of our comfort zone.
Fortunately, none of that seems to mean anything in real English, though it has the makings of a totalitarian therapeutic rewrite of “Put on a Happy Face”:
Gray skies are gonna push off Move out your comfort zone Barack will work your tush off Move out your comfort zone Give up your gloomy lives so uninvolved It’s not allowed Barack requires every one involved So join the crowd . . . I’m willing to cut presidential spouses a lot of slack. When Senator Obama said Jeremiah Wright was like a goofy uncle, it was pointed out that your relatives are a given but you get to choose your pastor. It’s true that you also get to choose your wife, but, unless you’re particularly far-sighted, you don’t always choose with a presidential run in mind. I found Teresa Heinz’s tone-deafness to the rhythms of democratic politics one of the more charmingly genuine features of John Kerry’s phony-baloney populist campaign. Who wouldn’t love a woman who, shanghaied into lunching at Wendy’s, demands to know what “chili” is and has to have it explained to her by the clerk that it’s a meat-based food dish widely consumed around the United States?
Oddly enough, despite being a couple of decades younger and several gazillion dollars poorer, Mrs. Obama has a tin ear even Mrs. Kerry must marvel at. Addressing a group of struggling women in economically torpid central Ohio, Michelle Obama eschewed the usual I-feel-your-pain shtick and invited her audience to feel hers, lurching into a long riff on the expense of extracurricular activities for her daughters, piano and dance and summer camp, and somehow she and Barack are expected to figure out how to pay for it on a combined salary of 500 grand a year, not including his book royalties and her corporate directorship. (Nor the house they bought for $1.6 million.) Mrs. Obama’s plaint was worryingly reminiscent of the time the Prince of Wales, attempting to bond with some of the British Army’s black recruits, said that he too knew what it was to suffer prejudice: At his boarding school some of the boys had been prejudiced against him because he was a prince. (“The people in my dormitory are foul,” he wrote to the Queen in 1964. “They throw slippers all night long or hit me with pillows.”)
You can understand why a visit to Wendy’s by Teresa Heinz, a Portuguese Mozambican ketchup heiress, should come off like an ill-advised anthropological expedition, but it’s less clear why so much of American life should seem so foreign to Michelle Obama. Come presidential season, the Democrats prefer blind dates while the Republicans make do with the old coot who’s been pestering them for a night out since Gold Diggers of 1935. So the Dems nominate total unknowns — Carter, Dukakis, Clinton — while the GOP nominates fellows they know only too well — Bush 41, Dole, McCain.
In the case of Barack Obama, it’s not just that he’s unknown, but that he seems eerily unknowable. When assorted members of the Kennedy clan endorsed him, I was struck by the one respect in which Senator Obama is undoubtedly Kennedyesque: Like JFK, he’s cool and a little remote in public; he’ll shake hands, he’ll kiss babies, he’ll essay a self-deprecating remark or two, but that’s it. In a white guy, the cool would seem arrogant: Even Jack Kennedy couldn’t get away with being Jack Kennedy on the stump in 2008. Yet, next to an oleaginous, ingratiating creep like John Edwards, flaunting his Dickensian childhood, Obama is, like Churchill’s Russia, a riddle wrapped in a mystery inside an enigma. And, as with Churchill’s Russia, it’s not always clear whether the interests of Obama and the United States always coincide. In the youthful chapters of his autobiography, Dreams of My Father, Barack deploys terms such as “Eurocentrism” and “post-colonialism” with amused detachment, as if to reassure us that even at college these were only ever drolly ironic concepts to him — or, at any rate, merely the universal passwords to sex and drugs. But the same amused detachment pervades the later chapters. On a recent conference call to discuss debate strategy against Hillary, Mrs. Obama interrupted the high-priced consultants to urge, “Barack! Feel — don’t think.” But it’s not apparent what, if anything, Barack does feel.
THE SOULS OF CONFLICTED FOLK That’s where Michelle comes in. Whether or not Senator Obama’s friends know him, he doesn’t seem to know them, not if Tony Rezko or Jeremiah Wright is anything to go by. After another medley of Jeremiah’s Greatest Hits was released, the senator declared: “All of the statements that have been the subject of controversy are ones that I vehemently condemn” — or, as translated by Slate’s Mickey Kaus, “If it offends you, I condemn it.” The Wright brother flies solo as far as his wilder flights of fancy are concerned. Well, okay. But the problem for the enigmatic Obama is that his wife gives every indication of broadly subscribing to the Reverend Wright’s world view, albeit without the profanity and accompanying pelvic thrusts.
She was born in 1964, so, unlike, say, Condi Rice, she has no vivid childhood memories of racial segregation. She grew up in a conventional two-parent household that, though poor and living in a small apartment, gathered each evening for dinner, so she’s not a victim of the Great Society’s atomization of the black family. She was among the first generation to benefit from “affirmative action,” which was supposed to ameliorate the lingering grievances of racism but seems, in Mrs. Obama’s case, merely to have transformed them into post-modern pseudo-grievance. “All my life I have confronted people who had a certain expectation of me,” she told an audience in Madison. “Every step of the way, there was somebody there telling me what I couldn’t do. Applied to Princeton. ‘You can’t go there, your test scores aren’t high enough.’ I went. I graduated with departmental honors. And then I wanted to go to Harvard. And that was probably a little too tough for me. I didn’t even know why they said that.”
But hang on. Her test scores weren’t “high enough” for Princeton. Yet, rather than telling her, “You can’t go there,” they took her anyway. And all the thanks they get is that her test scores are now a recurring point of resentment: “The stuff that we’re seeing in these polls,” she told an interviewer, “has played out my whole life. You know, always been told by somebody that I’m not ready, that I can’t do something, my scores weren’t high enough.” If you were, say, Elizabeth Edwards and your scores weren’t high enough, that’d be that (Teresa Heinz could probably leverage the whole Mozambican thing). Yet Mrs. Obama regards state-mandated compensation for previous racism as a new burden to bear.
In an early indication of the post-modern narcissism on display at Zanesville, she arrived as a black woman at Princeton and wrote her undergraduate thesis on the problems of being a black woman at Princeton. Princeton-Educated Blacks and the Black Community is a self-meditation by the then Miss Robinson on the question of whether an Ivy League black student drawn remorselessly into the white world is betraying lower-class blacks. As she put it:
A separationist is more likely to have a realistic impression of the plight of the Black lower class because of the likelihood that a separationist is more closely associated with the Black lower class than are integrationist [sic]. By actually working with the Black lower class or within their communities as a result of their ideologies, a separationist [sic] may better understand the desparation [sic] of their situation and feel more hopeless about a resolution as opposed to an integrationist who is ignorant to their plight. Ah, the benefits of an elite education. The thesis is dopey, illiterate, and bizarrely punctuated, but so are the maunderings of many American students. What makes Miss Robinson’s youthful opus relevant is that the contradictions it agonizes over have dominated her life. Indeed, her apparent bitterness at a society that has given her blessings she could not have enjoyed anywhere else on earth seems explicitly to derive from her inability to live either as an “integrationist who is ignorant to [the] plight” of “the Black lower class” or a “separationist” embracing its hopelessness and “desperation.” Instead, she rode her privileged education to wealth and success and then felt bad about it. That’s why she talks about money — her money — more than any other contender for first lady ever has: It’s like an ongoing interior monologue about whether she sold out for too cheap a price. Still, she’s learned her lesson. As she told her listeners in Ohio:
“We left corporate America, which is a lot of what we’re asking young people to do. Don’t go into corporate America.”
That’s what the Obama campaign is “asking young people to do”? “Don’t go into corporate America”? But isn’t “corporate America” what pays for, among other things, the Gulf Emir–sized retinue of courtiers the average U.S. senator now travels with?
And in what sense did the Obamas “leave” corporate America? Mrs. Obama works for the University of Chicago Hospitals. She’s not a nurse or doctor. She’s a lawyer who was taken on by the hospitals in 2002 to run “programs for community relations, neighborhood outreach, volunteer recruitment, staff diversity, and minority contracting.” In 2005, she got a $200,000 pay raise and was appointed Vice President for Community and External Affairs and put in charge of managing “the Hospitals’ business diversity program.”
You can appreciate why Barack Obama is less gung-ho than Hillary for socialized health care. If you work at the Royal Victoria Hospital in Montreal, there are certainly the usual professional diversity apparatchiks, but they’re not pulling down 300K a year plus benefits. You need a “corporate sector” for that.
This is what makes Michelle Obama in Zanesville another Teresa Heinz in Wendy’s or Prince of Wales making small-talk with black squaddies. Her “adult lifetime” has been spent in some of the most unrepresentative quarters of American life: Princeton, the ever-metastasizing bureaucracy of diversity enforcement, and Jeremiah Wright’s neo-segregationist ghetto of Afrocentric liberation theology and conspiracy theory. If young people were to follow the Obamas’ message and abandon “corporate America” for the above precincts, the nation would collapse. Michelle Obama embodies a peculiar mix of privilege and victimology, which is not where most Americans live. On the other hand, it does make her a terrific Oprah guest: Unlike her sonorous, dignified, restrained husband, she has exactly the combination of wealth and vulnerability prized by connoisseurs of daytime talk shows.
There’s something pitiful about a political culture that has no use for Mitt Romney, a hugely successful businessman, but venerates a woman who gets more than 300 grand for running a “neighborhood outreach” and “staff diversity” program. They seem curious career choices for the closest confidante of a man who claims to be running as a “post-racial” candidate. Which Barack Obama certainly could have been: He’s no tired old race-baiter making a lucrative career out of grievance-mongering, like Jesse Jackson, President-for-Life of the Republic of Himself. In many ways, he’s similar to Colin Powell, a bipartisan figure born to a British subject (in Powell’s case, from the Caribbean; in Obama’s, from colonial Kenya) and thus untinged by the bitterness of the African-American experience. And yet the two most important figures in Obama’s adult life exemplify all the tired obsessions he was supposed to transcend. I don’t agree with Powell on anything very much, from abortion to Iraq. But, with hindsight, it’s a tragedy that he didn’t have the fire in his belly to run in 1996. He was truly the post-racial candidate Senator Obama poses as.
Most Americans — even those upscale white liberals who embraced Obama as the new black best friend they’d been waiting for all these years — don’t want to think about race that much. I don’t suppose the Rev. Jeremiah Wright, in his new, 98 percent white gated community, even thinks about it that much. And as Michelle Obama advised: Feel — don’t think. Is it a bumper sticker yet? It ought to be. It gets to the heart of the matter better than “change you can believe in,” “belief you can change,” “change you can feel,” “hope you can grope,” or the rest of the pleasantly gaseous uplift. Everyone feels good about Obama. He’s the fellow we’ve wanted to feel good about for so long. But Michelle Obama, and her own uncertain feelings for America, put a big question mark over that.
You know, that's an interesting idea. Maybe Obama doesn't agree with Wright and maybe he hasn't objected and maybe he continues to go to that church simply for the sake of peace at home. He wouldn't be the first husband to do so.
IMO, her evil heart shows through her equally evil face. Sorry everyone, she’s not pretty no matter how you want to put a good face on it.
LOL, not sure how you did that, but well done!
International.
Excellent!
Looks as though Michelle made an appearance. Or else that 7thson - he be a stinker!
BWAHAHAHAHA!
How’d you do that?
I need to check that out.
LOL. Who isn’t a fan of Steyn....well, except for Michelle, ma belle. It appears Mrs. Grievance isn’t too happy with Steyn and the posters on this thread!
Absolutely!
The intro is a bit much, but the article is great Steyn. I hate to carp but the likes of Michelle’s caboose hasn’t been seen since bustles went out of fashion.
I do not know what you are talking about. What shows up when you read my post or do you have me confused with some other poster?
LOL! Steyn is treasure.
*snicker* I love the Beatles reference..
LOL. Classic Steyn.
Thanks!
7thson is Michelle, Ma Belle?
Wow! Who knew?
I think they tried replying to the post right after yours.
Check it out.
It’s Post # 15 1/2, from Michelle Hussein Obama.
OH MY Goodness! How did you do that?
You get Post of the Year!!!!!!!!!
Thanks, might have missed this thread. LOL
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.