I have no problem with the State of Texas going into that compound to stop abuse and explotation of those young children. I have one hell of a problem with taking away the ability for those mothers to communicate with anyone they desire to, unless those women have been charged with a crime.
The women are free to leave, and they are also free to speak to the media. The cell phones were taken away to prevent the men back at the ranch from giving orders to the women about what lies to tell to investigators so they men’s and women’s lies will match. The men, especially the top leaders, are also likely to be transmitting instructions about what horrible lies the women should tell the children, like about how they’ll burn in hell for eternity if they answer interviewers’ questions honestly or reveal any of the “sacred things” (i.e. rape) that went on in the temple. There is HUGE motivation for witness tampering here.
More to this than meets the eye, I’m guessing. If these people were “rescued” why do they need silencing ?
You ain't the only one!
“I have one hell of a problem with taking away the ability for those mothers to communicate with anyone they desire to, unless those women have been charged with a crime.”
We all do.
But these mothers, and children, are not allowed to communicate with anyone they desire to.
If they do, they can be sold or transferred like chattel, at the whim of Warren Jeffs and his merry band.
The government is worried that their ‘husbands’ will convince them to keep quiet, to protect the wealth, power, and ability to forcefully violate any woman or child of their choosing.
These children aren’t even sure who their biological mother is.
We might be violating the mothers right to call anyone, but if we don’t, aren’t we violating the trust of the nation by allowing children to be seduced by a cult that buys loyalty with little girls?
This is typical CPS modu operendi. CPS is known to exploit children, and the gay adoption scheme is one of those. The communication scheme is so these people are forced to pay lawyers and government officials to provide for the communication. It's a pure control and $ scheme. They don't want the children to fear the government but the government can go ahead and make the children fear the parents. Add to that the bogus "privacy for children" rule which prevents juries from sitting on trials, and, instead gives full privacy for gov-officials to figure how to share the "child support" tax the parents will have to pay without representation to the various organizations, lawyers and governments.