Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BREAKING NEWS UPDATE: Authorities enter Eldorado-area temple (Fundamentalist LDS cult)
Go San Angelo ^ | 5 April 08 | Paul A. Anthony

Posted on 04/06/2008 5:27:22 AM PDT by SkyPilot

Local and state officials entered the temple of a secretive polygamist sect late Saturday, said lawmen blockading the road to the YFZ Ranch near Eldorado.

The action comes hours after local prosecutors said officials were preparing for the worst because a group of FLDS members were resisting efforts to search the structure.

The Texas Department of Public Safety trooper and Schleicher County sheriff’s deputy confirmed that officials have entered the temple but said they had no word on whether anything occurred in the effort.

The incursion into the temple caps the three-day saga of the state’s Child Protective Services agency removing at least 183 women and children from the YFZ Ranch since Friday afternoon. Eighteen girls have been placed in state custody since a 16-year-old told authorities she was married to a 50-year-old man and had given birth to his child.

Saturday evening, ambulances were brought in, said Allison Palmer, who as first assistant 51st District attorney, would prosecute any felony crimes uncovered as part of the investigation inside the compound.

“In preparing for entry to the temple, law enforcement is preparing for the worst,” Palmer said Saturday evening. They want to have “medical personnel on hand in case this were to go in a way that no one wants.”

Apparently as a result of action Saturday night at the ranch, about 10:15 p.m. Saturday, a Schleicher County school bus unloaded another group of at least a dozen more women and children from the compound.

Although members of the Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, or FLDS, have provided varying degrees of cooperation to the sheriff’s deputies and Texas Rangers searching the compound, all cooperation stopped once authorities tried to search the gleaming white temple that towers over the West Texas scrub, Palmer said.

“There may be those who would oppose (entry) by placing themselves between law enforcement and the place of worship,” Palmer said Saturday afternoon. “If an agreement cannot be reached … law enforcement will have to — as gently and peaceably as possible — make entry into that place.”

Sect members consider the temple, dedicated by then-leader of the sect Warren Jeffs in January 2005 and finished many months later, off-limits to those who are not FLDS members, said Palmer, who prosecutes felony cases in Schleicher County.

Palmer said she didn’t know the size or makeup of the group inside the temple.

The earlier refusal to provide access was even more disconcerting because CPS investigators have yet to identify the 16-year-old girl or her roughly 8-month-old baby among the dozens removed from the compound, Palmer said.

“Anytime someone says, ‘Don’t look here,’” she said, “it makes you concerned that’s exactly where you need to look.”

The girl told authorities in two separate phone calls a day apart that she was married to a 50-year-old man, Dale Barlow, who had fathered her child, Palmer said.

The joint raid included the Texas Rangers, CPS, Schleicher County and Tom Green County sheriff’s deputies and game wardens from the Texas Department of Parks and Wildlife.

Although CPS and Department of Public Safety officials have described the compound’s residents as cooperative, Palmer disagreed.

“Things have been a little tense, a little volatile,” she said.

Authorities removed 52 children Friday afternoon and 131 women and children overnight Friday. About 40 of the children are boys, said CPS spokeswoman Marleigh Meisner.

No further children have been taken into state custody since Friday, when 18 girls were judged to have been abused or be at imminent risk for abuse. CPS has found foster homes for the girls, Meisner said, and will place them after concluding its investigation.

Meisner declined to comment on the fate of the 119 other children and said authorities were still searching the ranch for others Saturday evening.

“They’re in the process of looking,” she said. “They’re literally about halfway through.”


TOPICS: Breaking News; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: cult; flds; jeffs; lds; lyingfreepers; mormon; mormonism; pitcairnisland; pologamy; polygamy; romney; soapoperaresty; warrenjeffs
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,481-1,5001,501-1,5201,521-1,540 ... 3,741-3,746 next last
To: bonfire

Shep doesn’t look like he is fond of Merril Jessop!


1,501 posted on 04/08/2008 4:18:19 PM PDT by JRochelle (Voting Obama on May 6.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1499 | View Replies]

To: restornu; metmom; Tennessee Nana; Froufrou
But the Father and the Son did not disagree if you John there so many Places of where Jesus give the glory to his father.

I KNOW that because They are One, that is the essence of the Trinity. However, under your belief, They could disagree.

1,502 posted on 04/08/2008 4:18:59 PM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1481 | View Replies]

To: Degaston
As a LDS High Priest I’d like to personally apologize for the arrogant behavior of my church’s top leadership on Polygamy for the past many decades. We’ve winked at the abuse that was systematically taking place in Southern Utah and Northern Arizona because it put a big spotlight on an embarassing chapter of Mormon history that frankly we’d rather have go away. And in order to have a better public image, to bring in more tithepaying converts and to keep current members as tithepayers the church has purposely made sure through the Correlation program that the membership is ill-informed on the church’s history with polygamy and thus the missionaries go out spreading whatever stories they feel will help their investigators swallow the polygamy story best with total disregard by the top hierarchy over whether or not they tell the truth or not.

If ever there is a church in serious need of reform its mine.

I appreciate your post, Degaston. Would that many more of your fellow mormons would have the same decency to condemn the leaders for their condoning of by ignoring this practice.

However, be careful what you post in the way of information...there are those here who would report you to the church if they knew who you are IRL.

1,503 posted on 04/08/2008 4:22:38 PM PDT by greyfoxx39 (An "Inconvenient Truth".....Save the Earth... it's the only planet with chocolate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1485 | View Replies]

To: greyfoxx39; Degaston
However, be careful what you post in the way of information...there are those here who would report you to the church if they knew who you are IRL.

I would like to second that recommendation, not to let paranoia set in though. Your statement was like a breath of fresh air here.

1,504 posted on 04/08/2008 4:25:12 PM PDT by Godzilla (The early bird may get the worm, but the second mouse gets the cheese.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1503 | View Replies]

To: JRochelle; Caramelgal
Wow, thats a big lie.

Lying takes intent, You know her intent how?

Just because people in the OT were polygamous does not mean God condoned it.

It does if he says they were righteous (Abraham), or Tells them he gave them the wives (David). God does not "approve" of sin or sinners nor does he "Give" people things that cause them to sin.

Jesus clearly taught that marriage is between one man and one woman.

Jesus never taught that, Jesus taught that Divorce is bad, he said nothing about polygamy, Incidentally, the system we have right now with Divorce and remarriage is exactly what Jesus was condemning, he took the time to condemn Divorce, he never spoke about polygamy, it was not an issue for him.

Now people are free to pick and choose and interpret scripture however they choose.

I guess so, that does not however make that interpretation correct.

That doesn't mean they are right.

Nor does it men you are right.

That doesn't mean that whenever a man sees a pretty young girl and sprouts a woody that it is God's will for him to have that girl.

Actually, I think he specifically has a problem with the Looking and Sprouting wood, See Matt. 5: 28

So spare me the BS about polygamy being OK with God.

OK, truthfully, God would rather have all women married and procreating within the bonds of matrimony (that multiply command has never been repealed) than see prostitution and or adultery. Unfortunately, Women outnumber men in the world, so what are you gonna do?

Show me the scripture where God suspends the Ten Commandments and says that adultery is now o.k.

Alright, this is a fallacious argument, in that polygamy is not adultery.

Now can I show you a scripture where God says Polygamy is legal, sure:
2 Sam 12:8
8 And I gave thee thy master’s house, and thy master’s wives into thy bosom, and gave thee the house of Israel and of Judah; and if that had been too little, I would moreover have given unto thee such and such things.
After David has fallen and slept with Bathsheba, and killed Uriah, Samuel comes to him to tell him of the lord's punishment for his murder of Uriah, as part of that Samuel tells David how much he had and what he as lost. God Gave David his wives, that means God approved of them, God does not change therefore he still approves of Polygamy. This is a simple point to understand which does not excuse the horrific things that apparently were going on in this "community" I use the word loosely. In a day when Marriages were Common at 15 and 16, because of the projected lifespan, fine. That day has passed. There is IMHO no reason for any woman to marry either before she is ready or a man she does not want to. I believe in the laws which protect those too immature to make such decisions. I believe in the laws which protect minors from advances by dirty old or young men. Those have nothing to do with polygamy, and I wish someone would explain to me why otherwise logical Christians would rather see a couple of Guys "get hitched" (I refuse to call it a Marriage) than allow two women who want to to marry the same man who wants to marry them.

(the Psychological status of such people not with standing)

Can somebody explain this to me logically? Anybody? Bueler?


1,505 posted on 04/08/2008 4:25:56 PM PDT by DelphiUser ("You can lead a man to knowledge, but you can't make him think")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: bonfire
Did you see this latest news update?

FLDS teen whose call sparked Texas raid said she feared for her life from physically abusive husband

1,506 posted on 04/08/2008 4:27:05 PM PDT by SkyPilot ("I wasn't in church during the time when the statements were made.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1499 | View Replies]

To: CindyDawg

I don’t have the computer skills. It looks kind of blurry as it is so I don’t know how much more you could see of it.


1,507 posted on 04/08/2008 4:29:04 PM PDT by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1462 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

So you see, unlike Christianity that equates male souls and female souls as equal in God’s eyes and precious to Him, Mormonism teaches that a woman will be damned to hell without a celestial marriage to someone of the “preisthood.”
__________________________________________

A few months ago, a mormon guy told me in a thread that I was evil and a feminist because I claimed that I could be saved on my own without a man’s help..

He boasted that his mormon wife was a “real”woman” and placed him on a pedestal and “adored” him and did all manner of things for him etc

he told me his wife had read my posts and told him that I was not a “good” woman etc...

Warren Jeffs is a FReeper ?????


1,508 posted on 04/08/2008 4:30:13 PM PDT by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1486 | View Replies]

To: Pebcak
Jessop said the men were becoming worried about their wives and children because they have no Internet or television access.

Would I be amiss in presuming that they didn't have it before, either?

1,509 posted on 04/08/2008 4:30:20 PM PDT by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1461 | View Replies]

To: Tennessee Nana

Dang!

Who was that Freeper?

PM me, I am dying to know.


1,510 posted on 04/08/2008 4:31:55 PM PDT by JRochelle (Voting Obama on May 6.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1508 | View Replies]

To: metmom

The sentence is misleading - I believe the intent was they never had tv/phones at the ranch and now they will have access to both.


1,511 posted on 04/08/2008 4:33:19 PM PDT by FeliciaCat (I like my money where I can see it...hanging in my closet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1509 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot; bonfire

Vile and evil. Everytime someone tries to justify this evil it’s only because they don’t believe there is anything wrong. They live among us too which scares me even MORE!
To even speak out about it (even here on FR) will open you up to threats, ridicule, name calling, Freep hatemail, deleted posts, threats of banning, and the like.

That’s fine with me. I consider it persecution for Christ’s sake.
_______________________________________

And even be accused of going over to the “darkside” (whatever that is) by non-mormons who dont have a clue but are sympathetic towards the poor widdle victim mormons...


1,512 posted on 04/08/2008 4:33:52 PM PDT by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1496 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot; bonfire
Mormons, Catholics, evangelical Protestants, and Orthodox Jews agree that:

Abortion is murder
Homosexuality is perversion
The second amendment is not about the National Guard
Property Rights are key to maintaining economic and political freedom
etc.

But I guess if you want to focus on the differences and sow dissent rather than try to help create unity against the evil forces of libertinism, socialism, and communism then you are free to do so.

That you are focusing your energy on creating dissent among otherwise agreeable people says more about you than about the particular thread you are posting to.

1,513 posted on 04/08/2008 4:35:50 PM PDT by who_would_fardels_bear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1473 | View Replies]

To: DelphiUser
Today of all days, when we have clear evidence of the evils of polygamy, I am shocked that you would still defend it.

POLYGAMY IS OF THE DEVIL.

Jesus so clearly taught against it.

1,514 posted on 04/08/2008 4:36:13 PM PDT by JRochelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1505 | View Replies]

To: FeliciaCat
I am totally disgusted with the attitude of some of these posters.

Some of these posters have the same mind set as described above in

1466 above

"If the law comes in and takes over, or anything happens to them, it is all a test sent from God, through WarrenJoseph Smith. Everything is a test, because they believe that the afterlife is going to tell the truth. And they believe that once this life is over then they're going to be -- they're going to be either celestialized, which is you know, given the highest degree of glory in the kingdom of heaven, or they will damned forever to hell."

1,515 posted on 04/08/2008 4:38:26 PM PDT by greyfoxx39 (An "Inconvenient Truth".....Save the Earth... it's the only planet with chocolate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1482 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot
The problem is, how do we put every single polygamist in the state in jail and then what do we do with tens of thousands of kids? I don't have the resources to get involved in that. I want to focus on the most serious crimes being committed in the name of religion.

What do you do with them? Nothing different than what you've been doing. They've been on the welfare roles already, have they not? Nothing new then.

1,516 posted on 04/08/2008 4:40:43 PM PDT by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1466 | View Replies]

To: DelphiUser

Why are you using bible passages for defending forced Polygamy in this day and age? I’m sorry but this was practiced ALONG TIME AGO in a different time. Do you still travel via donkey or camel too?


1,517 posted on 04/08/2008 4:41:35 PM PDT by FeliciaCat (I like my money where I can see it...hanging in my closet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1505 | View Replies]

To: DelphiUser

After David has fallen and slept with Bathsheba, and killed Uriah, Samuel comes to him to tell him of the lord’s punishment for his murder of Uriah,
_____________________________________________

No, Samuel never did that at all

It was Nathan that came to David...

And God did not condone adultery or bigamy...


1,518 posted on 04/08/2008 4:41:37 PM PDT by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1505 | View Replies]

To: metmom

You go after all the fathers for child support owed the state.


1,519 posted on 04/08/2008 4:43:33 PM PDT by CindyDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1516 | View Replies]

To: Tennessee Nana
A few months ago, a mormon guy told me in a thread that I was evil and a feminist because I claimed that I could be saved on my own without a man’s help.. He boasted that his mormon wife was a “real”woman” and placed him on a pedestal and “adored” him and did all manner of things for him etc he told me his wife had read my posts and told him that I was not a “good” woman etc...

You are my sister in Christ Nana.

___________________________________________________________________

Then the Sadducees, who say there is no resurrection, came to him with a question. "Teacher," they said, "Moses wrote for us that if a man's brother dies and leaves a wife but no children, the man must marry the widow and have children for his brother. Now there were seven brothers. The first one married and died without leaving any children. The second one married the widow, but he also died, leaving no child. It was the same with the third. In fact, none of the seven left any children. Last of all, the woman died too. At the resurrection whose wife will she be, since the seven were married to her?" Jesus replied, "Are you not in error because you do not know the Scriptures or the power of God? When the dead rise, they will neither marry nor be given in marriage; they will be like the angels in heaven. Now about the dead rising—have you not read in the book of Moses, in the account of the bush, how God said to him, 'I am the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob? He is not the God of the dead, but of the living. You are badly mistaken!"

Mark 12: 18-27

1,520 posted on 04/08/2008 4:44:19 PM PDT by SkyPilot ("I wasn't in church during the time when the statements were made.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1508 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,481-1,5001,501-1,5201,521-1,540 ... 3,741-3,746 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson