Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fear Of Democracy (Why The Left Refuses To Stand Up For Free Speech Alert)
Jerusalem Post ^ | 4/04/2008 | Caroline Glick

Posted on 04/04/2008 3:05:05 PM PDT by goldstategop

The West stands by idly as its foundations are rent asunder.Last Friday the UN's Human Rights Council took a direct swipe at freedom of expression. In a 32-0 vote, the council instructed its "expert on freedom of expression" to report to the council on all instances in which individuals "abuse" their freedom of speech by giving expression to racial or religious bias.

The measure was proposed by paragons of freedom Egypt and Pakistan. It was supported by all Arab, Muslim and African countries - founts of liberty one and all. European states abstained.

The US, which is not a member of the Human Rights Council, tried to oppose the measure. In a speech before the council, US Ambassador to the UN in Geneva Warren Tichenor warned that the resolution's purpose is to undermine freedom of expression because it imposes "restrictions on individuals rather than emphasiz[ing] the duty and responsibility of governments to guarantee, uphold, promote and protect human rights."

By seeking to criminalize free speech, the resolution stands in breach of the UN's Declaration of Human Rights. Article 19 of that document states explicitly: "Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers."

The Europeans' decision to abstain rather than oppose the measure seems, at first glance, rather surprising. Given that the EU member states are among the UN's most emphatic champions, it would have seemed normal for them to have opposed a resolution that undermines one of the UN's foundational documents, and indeed, one of the most basic tenets of Western civilization.

But then again, given the EU's stands in recent years against freedom of expression, there really is nothing to be surprised about. The EU's current bow to intellectual thuggery is of course found in its response to the Internet release of Dutch parliamentarian Geert Wilders' film Fitna.

The EU has gone out of its way to attack Wilders for daring to exercise his freedom of expression. The EU's presidency released a statement condemning the film for "inflaming hatred." Dutch Prime Minister Jan Peter Balkenende issued statements claiming that the film "serves no other purpose than to cause offense."

Then, too, UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon blasted the film as "offensively anti-Islamic."

These statements follow the EU's quest to restrict freedom of speech following the 2005 publication of cartoons of Muhammed in Denmark's Jyllands Posten newspaper. They also come against the backdrop of the systematic silencing of anti-jihadist intellectuals throughout the continent. These intellectuals, such as Peter Redeker in France and Paul Cliteur in the Netherlands, are threatened into silence by European jihadists. And the governments of Europe either do nothing to defend the threatened thinkers or justify the intellectual blackmailers by sympathizing with their anger.

IT IS axiomatic that freedom of expression is the foundation of human freedom and progress. When people are not allowed to express themselves freely, there can be no debate or inquiry. It is only due to free debate and inquiry that humanity has progressed from the Dark Age to the Digital Age. This is why the first act of every would-be tyrant is to take control of the marketplace of ideas.

Yet today, the nations of Europe and indeed much of the Western world, either sit idly by and do nothing to defend that freedom or collaborate with unfree and often tyrannical Islamic states and terrorists in silencing debate and stifling dissent.

There are two reasons why this is the case.

First, the political Left, which rules supreme in the EU's bureaucracy as well as in most of the intellectual centers of the free world, has shown through its actions that it has no real commitment to democratic values. Rather than embrace democratic values, the Left increasingly adopts the parlance of democracy cynically, with the aim of undermining free discourse in the public sphere in the name of "democracy."

Writing of the leftist uproar against Wilders' film in Europe in Der Speigel, Henryk Broder noted that almost across the board, the European media has castigated Wilders as "a right-wing populist." As Broder notes, on its face this assertion is absurd, for Wilders is a radical liberal.

In Fitna, the outspoken legislator shows how verses of the Koran are used by jihadists to justify the most heinous acts of mass murder and hatred. His film superimposes verses from the Koran calling for the murder of non-Muslims with actual scenes of jihadist carnage. It also superimposes verses from the Koran vilifying Jews with footage of Islamic clerics repeating the verses and with a three-year-old girl saying that she learned that Jews are monkeys and pigs from her Koran classes. Fitna concludes with a challenge to Muslims to expunge these hateful, murderous religious tenets from their belief system.

While arguably, but not necessarily, inflammatory, Wilders' film serves as an invitation to Europe and to the Islamic world to hold an open debate. His film challenges viewers - both Muslim and non-Muslim - to think and to discuss whether Islam accords with the notions of human freedom and what can be done to stop jihadists from exploiting the Koran to justify their acts of murder, tyranny and hate.

As Broder notes, by calling Wilders a "right-wing populist," the Left seeks to silence both him and his call for an open discourse. The underlying message of such labeling is that Wilders is somehow beyond the pale of polite company and therefore his message should be ignored by all right thinking people. If you don't want to be intellectually isolated and socially ostracized like Wilders, then you mustn't watch his film or take it seriously. Doing so would be an act of "right-wing populism" - and everyone knows what that means.

Like all anti-democratic movements, today's political Left seeks to silence debate and so undermine democracy, first, by demonizing anyone who doesn't agree with it and then by passing laws that criminalize speech or override the people's right to decide how they wish to live.

In the EU, the Lisbon Treaty effectively regurgitated by bureaucratic fiat the constitution that was rejected by voters in France and the Netherlands and was set to be defeated by the British. In Britain, Parliament has labored for years to pass a law that would criminalize insulting Islam. Then, too, one of the first actions the Brown government took after entering office last summer was to prohibit its members from talking about "Islamic terrorism."

AS IN Europe, so too in Israel, the Left goes to extraordinary lengths to undermine democracy in the name of democracy.

In just one recent example, this week leftist law professor Mordechai Kremnitzer warned the Knesset not to pass a law enabling a referendum on any future partition of Jerusalem or surrender of the Golan Heights. As Kremnitzer sees it, "If the verdict of a referendum is determined by a small majority that includes Arab voters, then a certain sector whose view was not accepted is liable to attempt to reject the legitimacy of the referendum and may fight against it violently."

That "certain sector" Kremnitzer was referring to, of course, are the Jews who oppose the partition of Jerusalem and the surrender of the Golan Heights, by a large majority.

Kremnitzer's argument is both ridiculous and self-serving. It is ridiculous because he knows that in 2004, Likud members held a referendum on the government's planned withdrawal from Gaza and northern Samaria. Then-prime minister Ariel Sharon pledged to abide by the results of his party's vote. But when 65 percent of Likud members rejected his plan, he ignored them. And the public's reaction, while strong, was completely nonviolent.

The only force that used sustained force and intimidation in the run-up to the withdrawal from Gaza and northern Samaria was the government. It deployed tens of thousands of policemen to break up protests and bar protesters from travelling to lawful demonstrations, and jailed protesters without trial for months. In its overtly anti-democratic and legally dubious actions, the government was ably defended by Kremnitzer and his colleagues, who either stood by as the civil liberties of the protesters were trampled or enthusiastically defended the government's abandonment of democratic values by calling the protesters "anti-democratic."

Indeed, in his testimony Wednesday, Kremnitzer parroted that argument by claiming that referendums "are a recipe for harming democracy."

Aside from being factually and theoretically wrong, Kremnitzer's argument - like the arguments of the EU bureaucracy that sidelined Europe's citizenry by passing the Lisbon Treaty - is transparently self-serving. Like his EU counterparts, he knows full well that his support for an Israeli surrender of Jerusalem and the Golan Heights is a minority view. So his actual concern is not the health of Israeli democracy, but the power of the political Left to determine policy against the interests and wishes of the public.

THE SECOND reason that the Left acquiesces to the silencing of speech is because its members are just as concerned about the threat of Islamic supremacy as their political opponents. But unlike their opponents, they are too cowardly to do anything about it. This point was made clear, too, in the wake of the release of Wilders' film.

This week a delegation of Dutch Christian and Muslim religious leaders travelled to Cairo to speak to religious Islamic leaders. Speaking to Radio Netherlands, Bas Plaisier, who heads the Dutch Protestant Church, said the delegation's mission was to "limit the possible consequences" of Wilders' film. The consequences he was referring to, of course, are the prospects of violent Muslim rioting and attacks against the Dutch and against Christians worldwide.

Radio Netherlands reported that Plaisier "has been receiving disturbing reports from Dutch nationals all over the world, including ones about fear of repercussions among Christians in Sudan, the Middle East and Indonesia."

So the real reason the Dutch Protestant Church decries the film is not because it thinks Wilders is wrong, but because its leaders believe that Wilders is absolutely right. It's just that unlike Wilders, who has placed his life in danger to express his views, they are too cowardly to defend themselves, and so, they travel to Cairo to genuflect to religious leaders who daily oversee the preaching of hate and Islamic supremacy in Egyptian mosques. They go on bended knee to coo before those who coerced the institutionalization of Egypt's religious persecution of its Christian Coptic minority and its silencing of liberal critics of the Mubarak regime and the Muslim Brotherhood.

And that is the rub. By squelching debate - out of loathing for its non-leftist political opponents and out of fear of jihadists and the regimes that promote them - the West as a whole undermines not only its own values and foundational creeds. It also undermines the non-jihadists of the Islamic world, who, if ever empowered, would work to promote a form of Islam that does not respond to challenge with violence but rather with the discourse of reason and mutual respect for differences of opinion.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Israel; News/Current Events; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: alqaeda; carolineglick; democracy; eu; fearfuldems; fitna; freedom; freespeech; geertwilders; glick; islam; islamofascism; israel; jerusalempost; jihadism; left; netherlands; un; west
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last
Caroline Glick points out the Left is opposed to free speech. In particular, it does like the truth expressed about Islam not out of fear as Glick argues but rather the opposite - it wants Western values overturned to enhance its own power and to render conservatives marginal to the debate in Western societies. The reaction to Fitna and Geert Wilders is telling.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

1 posted on 04/04/2008 3:05:06 PM PDT by goldstategop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

Yep, exactly. The Left finds itself compatriots in Islam against the freedoms expressed in the founding of this country.


2 posted on 04/04/2008 3:12:51 PM PDT by kenth (I have a apolitical blues)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kenth
Notably in the stealth candidacy of Obama. The Left has spent a lot of time excusing Jeremiah Wright's lunatic rantings but has yet to say a word about Islamist attempts to stifle free speech in Europe and elsewhere.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

3 posted on 04/04/2008 3:14:56 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
Democracy is Mob Rule.. always in every iteration every time.. Democracy causes socialism which is Slavery by Government..
--------------------------------

Democracy is the road to socialism. Karl Marx

Democracy is indispensable to socialism. The goal of socialism is communism. V.I. Lenin

The meaning of peace is the absence of opposition to socialism.- Karl Marx

4 posted on 04/04/2008 3:16:44 PM PDT by hosepipe (CAUTION: This propaganda is laced with hyperbole....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
"The EU has gone out of its way to attack Wilders for daring to exercise his freedom of expression. The EU's presidency released a statement condemning the film for "inflaming hatred." Dutch Prime Minister Jan Peter Balkenende issued statements claiming that the film "serves no other purpose than to cause offense."

Have any of these idiots actually read the Koran and the sacred words of Mohammad? Where is the outrage over that filth which promotes the Allah endorsed automatic enslavement of blacks, The beating of women who diobey their husbands, or the confining of women to a room until death should she not do something her husband desires of her?

Where is the outrage over Islam's sacred "holy" books which calls Jews animals, the offspring of pigs and monkeys, the order to kill Jews, and indeed ALL "infidels" who oppose Islam?

It seems quite clear just who has infiltrated the UN, even though these Islamic countries don't even warrant membership to the UN in ANY capacity because of their UNDEMORATIC nature, a violation of the UN's charter.

The Un is evil and corrupt. Stop funding this evil.

5 posted on 04/04/2008 3:23:11 PM PDT by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

So is McQueeg. What’s the big deal? No matter who wins the Presidential election, we’re going to have anti-free speech type in the Whitehouse.


6 posted on 04/04/2008 3:24:47 PM PDT by Little Ray (I'm a Conservative. But I can vote for John McCain. If I have to. I guess.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

Paging Voltaire.


7 posted on 04/04/2008 3:25:57 PM PDT by Samwise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Little Ray

Yes, and we’re going to have to do something about it. Hard choices but necessary.


8 posted on 04/04/2008 3:29:12 PM PDT by brushcop (B-Co. 2/69 3rd Infantry Div., "Sledgehammer!" ...and keep hammering 'em!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
By seeking to criminalize free speech, the resolution stands in breach of the UN’s Declaration of Human Rights. Article 19 of that document states explicitly: “Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.”


Wow the UN obviously let this little tidbit slide in unnoticed
9 posted on 04/04/2008 3:33:15 PM PDT by boxerblues (Hillary doesn't lie, she just tells the truth from an alternate reality)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Samwise

A worldwide “Fairness Doctrine”. Fitna should be distributed worldwide. Come and get me UN!


10 posted on 04/04/2008 3:33:54 PM PDT by MtnClimber (Not liking my choices in this election!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: brushcop

There are NO choices. No matter who wins, you get a Democrat in the Whitehouse (don’t believe the “R” after McQueeg’s name for a second...). You’re going to have a Democrat Congress (not that you’ll be able to tell ‘em from a Republican congress - except by what the spend the money on... and not always then!). Third parties are ludicrous.

Best thing do is hunker down. Put your money in conservative investments. Look for good sites to hide guns and ammo. BLOAT. Buy and stock ‘bug-out’ bags for your family. Work hard (the government needs your taxes...). And hope you’ll never need any of this stuff and can feel silly about it later on.


11 posted on 04/04/2008 3:37:34 PM PDT by Little Ray (I'm a Conservative. But I can vote for John McCain. If I have to. I guess.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: boxerblues

Not really. In that same treaty there is some garbage about if the rights or whatever are contrary to UN goals or policies, they don’t matter.
In other word, like most of what the UN does, the Declaration of Human Rights is a bunch of BS designed to conceal the real malevolence that is the UN.


12 posted on 04/04/2008 3:40:08 PM PDT by Little Ray (I'm a Conservative. But I can vote for John McCain. If I have to. I guess.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Little Ray

It’s getting difficult to stock up on primers.


13 posted on 04/04/2008 3:46:38 PM PDT by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
I am truly shocked that the Israelis, who fought so hard to keep their land, will let the leftist pols give it away to their enemies, who have sworn to kill every last Jew. Even Sharon betrayed his country & got rocket attacks in return.

Liberalism is surely a mental disease or defect. But conservative acquiescence to this madness is immoral.

14 posted on 04/04/2008 4:00:22 PM PDT by Mister Da (The mark of a wise man is not what he knows, but what he knows he doesn't know!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nathan Zachary
Where is the outrage over that filth which promotes the Allah endorsed automatic enslavement of blacks

Reference, please.

15 posted on 04/04/2008 4:01:18 PM PDT by Sherman Logan (Those who deny freedom to others deserve it not for themselves. - A. Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

She is correct. The reaction to Fitna is just post modernism. They are re-writing the meta narrative of world justice to overturn the hegemony of western capitalism and democracy. According to the left, the rise in fundamentalist (radical) Islam is a reaction to cultural, political and economic aggression and as such is justified in their hatred of Western values.

This is the same philosophy that Rev. Wright is teaching the Black community at his so-called church.


16 posted on 04/04/2008 4:02:37 PM PDT by Eva (CHANGE - the new euphemism for Marxist revolution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eva
That's right. Both radical Islam and the Left share a common loathing of America. And the Left looks sympathetically upon Islamists because they are the underdog.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

17 posted on 04/04/2008 4:09:27 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

It’s not so much that the left looks sympathetically on Islam as the underdog,as it is that the left interprets Islam as the under dog in the enemy of my enemy sort of way. They have just rationalized Islamists as oppressed by the west to fit their particular meta narrative. It’s hard to figure how the poor people of the middle east could be more oppressed by the western world, than by their own despotic rulers, but then you can’t rationalize irrational thinking.


18 posted on 04/04/2008 4:18:18 PM PDT by Eva (CHANGE - the new euphemism for Marxist revolution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Nathan Zachary
U.N. out of the U.S.

U.S. out of the U.N.

19 posted on 04/04/2008 4:19:44 PM PDT by Ouderkirk (Hillary = Senator Incitatus, Clintigula's whore...er, horse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop; Obadiah; Mind-numbed Robot; Zacs Mom; A.Hun; johnny7; The Spirit Of Allegiance; ...
The left does not believe in the First Amendment. It is the left which promotes the fiction that journalism is "the press" - which is nothing more than the notion that you have to have access to the AP newswire to have the right to freedom of the press.

The McCain-Feingold law was promoted by journalism, and for journalism - and for journalism's allies who join journalism in their self promotion via the criticism and second guessing of businessmen, the police, and the military. Anyone, that is, who takes concrete responsibility for concrete action.

The Market for Conservative-Based News


20 posted on 04/04/2008 4:26:31 PM PDT by conservatism_IS_compassion (The Democratic Party is only a front for the political establishment in America - Big Journalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson