Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is El Rushbo Too Hard on McCain?
The Rush Limbaugh Show ^ | 2 April 2008 | Rush Limbaugh

Posted on 04/02/2008 5:56:35 PM PDT by COBOL2Java

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last
To: Cicero
Yeah, that's the thing that gets me. Reagan won 49 states but they tell us that we need a liberal Republican to have a chance. The Republican before Reagan, Ford, was an admitted liberal Republican, and he couldn't beat the carter clown. Bush 1 ran on conservative coat tails and won and then lost when it became apparent he wasn't conservative. Liberal Dole was a loser. Liberal/moderate Republicans lose every time. No wonder the Democrats were so desperate to nominate McCain as our candidate.
21 posted on 04/02/2008 6:44:12 PM PDT by Perchant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: libbylu

I don’t think Rush really made McCain - I agree that it was the media, who found a Republican who was really just a covert Dem, and annointed him.

But my point was that Rush really didn’t encourage much discussion on his show among various conservative factions. He played clips from Hillary’s collected works, a few ravings from some leftist commentator or two, and then had callers commenting (some of them favorably) on these things. I think he should have spent more time simply airing conservatives, who get little time from the major media. Instead, all we got to hear was Hillary screaming at us or Osama being unctuous.


22 posted on 04/02/2008 6:45:11 PM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Cicero

Yeah, he’s right. Conservative voters put the Repubs in to do a job and they turned to the left. Now they wonder why they can’t get the votes.


23 posted on 04/02/2008 6:45:53 PM PDT by Eagles6 ( Typical White Guy: Christian, Constitutionalist, Heterosexual, Redneck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: livius

“He never had any conservatives on his show or even paid them much attention. It was all Dems, all the time.”

What are you talking about? Rush RARELY has guests on his show, and I don’t remember him ever having a democrat on as a guest. If you’re talking about the callers, the democrat callers are few and far between, but when he lands a good one, it’s worth the wait.

As for supporting McCain - I’m firmly on Rush’s side on this one, and not because I loathe McCain, but because I EXPECT Rush to tell me the truth - and that includes his honest opinion of the candidates. I neither expect nor want him to sugar coat an unacceptable candidate just because they have an “R” next to their name.


24 posted on 04/02/2008 6:49:58 PM PDT by Pravious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: livius

Rush needs to interview as many conservatives as he can. Put them on the spot and encourage them when they espouse conservative thought. Give them exposure.


25 posted on 04/02/2008 6:50:38 PM PDT by unkus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: livius

Rush needs to interview as many conservatives as he can. Put them on the spot and encourage them when they espouse conservative thought. Give them exposure.


26 posted on 04/02/2008 6:50:47 PM PDT by unkus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: COBOL2Java

Rush is giving the LEADERSHIP McCain is too weak and too RINO to be ABLE to provide.


27 posted on 04/02/2008 6:52:30 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eagles6

.....Now they wonder why they can’t get the votes......

No, that is not right. The formula is to trade a few on the right margin for a lot in the center.

the battle will be won left of center, not on the far right.

Winning is what matters. Adherance to inflexable rigid ideaology is not.


28 posted on 04/02/2008 6:52:56 PM PDT by bert (K.E. N.P. +12 . Never say never (there'll be a VP you'll like))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: livius
Rush is one of the reasons we have McCain.

Wrong. The democraps pulled and operation CHAOS on the Republicans before we could pull one on them.

He spent more than a year obsessing on the Dems and, particularly, Hillary Clinton. I got so fed up hearing about Dems, hearing interviews with Dems, and hearing Dem callers that I finally quit listening to him.

Verses what? Not enough LArry Craig? Bush border policy? Rush's problem was that not one conservative wanted the job and he knew (like myself) that Thompson was a phony and not serious about wanting the job! Our party was screwed no matter who we chose! McCain was the Democraps crossover chance and they selected him.

29 posted on 04/02/2008 6:57:43 PM PDT by Bommer (Hmmm who to vote for? A Far leftist? A Radical Leftist? Or a Republican that enjoys being a Leftist?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Perchant

“No wonder the Democrats were so desperate to nominate McCain as our candidate.”

I am also not pleased with McCain although I will vote for him over Hillary or Obama. I am hoping his VP choice will make it easier to vote for him!


30 posted on 04/02/2008 7:00:59 PM PDT by seekthetruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Pravious

For some months, it seemed like he was playing recordings of Hillary’s speeches for about a third of his show, followed up by clips of gushy things said about them by various stupid news personalities. If I had wanted to listen to those things, I would have done so in their original. But I wanted to hear other things from Rush.

There was very little discussion or analysis of the Republican candidates, and very little attempt to stir the pot a bit and get us some better candidates. Like it or not, Rush shapes opinion, and I think there was simply a void there. I’m not saying he should have endorsed a candidate, simply that he should have focused more on our candidates and less on theirs.


31 posted on 04/02/2008 7:04:49 PM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man

That is a great way to look at it.


32 posted on 04/02/2008 7:09:00 PM PDT by KC_Conspirator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Bommer

I can’t believe we couldn’t have gotten somebody better. Our candidates were all jokes. There are good younger conservatives; Osama is a relatively young radical leftist, why couldn’t we have gotten a relatively young conservative?

One of the problems is that Bush never cultivated a successor, mainly because he listened to the press and decided that he was the worst thing ever to come down the pike. Since his VP was too old to run, this meant that the usual way an incumbent passes on the torch wasn’t going to work this time.

What I am saying is that Rush should have ignored the Dems and left them to fight it out. Also, his stupid plan to get people to vote for Osama is going to backfire in a big way, because I think that hate-filled, leftist Muslim is actually going to get elected.


33 posted on 04/02/2008 7:09:16 PM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: COBOL2Java
If McStain loses in November, it's McStain’s fault. Not Rush's,and certainly not me, after I throw my vote at a turd party after having been given no other logical choice.
34 posted on 04/02/2008 7:21:10 PM PDT by Cold Heat (NO! (you can infer any meaning you choose))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: livius
He is leaving them to fight it out!

He only wants to assure that the fight will last until the convention blowup.

It's that simple. Really........

35 posted on 04/02/2008 7:23:42 PM PDT by Cold Heat (NO! (you can infer any meaning you choose))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: livius
I think that hate-filled, leftist Muslim is actually going to get elected.

The only way to prevent that is to encourage Hillary to stay in and destroy him. Then we can beat the shill.

36 posted on 04/02/2008 7:25:42 PM PDT by Cold Heat (NO! (you can infer any meaning you choose))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: BusterBear

That and Rush does a really pretty good ‘pissed off McCain’ voice.

“IT’s NOT AMNESTY!!”


37 posted on 04/02/2008 7:34:19 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (I'd like to tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: bert

I hope that you’re being sarcastic, otherwise, I respectfully disagree.


38 posted on 04/02/2008 7:46:22 PM PDT by Eagles6 ( Typical White Guy: Christian, Constitutionalist, Heterosexual, Redneck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: livius

Rush’s ‘principles’ only recently erupted. Where was he in 96, when Bob Dole ran? Dole never met a government handout he didn’t like!

I especially like where Rush just about comes out and says he’s really working for the GOP and McCain RIGHT NOW, and—as he has often been accused of being—is only “principled” for the dough. “If I endorsed McCain, why, the left would suddenly hate him and I’d lose my audience!” I think Rush demonstrated why he’s sticking with his ‘principles’ right there. He’d lose his RNC invite to the Lincoln bedroom, and he’d lose a small fortune in ad revenue if he didn’t.


39 posted on 04/02/2008 7:52:49 PM PDT by LibertarianInExile (McCain is W with a DD-214 and a flash temper. Another 4 years of this mess--or worse? Hell, no!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: livius
Rush could have given a good forum to different conservative candidates - but he didn’t.

The reason he didn't is because none of them came to bow in his presence and ask for his blessings. Rush is irrelevant in this election and his ego has been bruised. So, he's acting up by backing Hillary and denigrating McCain as his way of "I'll show you".

Rush is becoming a pain in the a** with his ego, almost as much as Hillary with hers.

40 posted on 04/02/2008 7:56:32 PM PDT by varon (Allegiance to the constitution, always. Allegiance to a political party, never.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson