[DoughtyOne]

How long can a free society last that allows the likes of Oliver Stone to herald it’s history?

I’m no fan of Bush by a long shot, but when Oliver Stone becomes involved in a project, you can expect credibility and even sanity to be in short supply by the time the project is presented to the public.

This is another movie I’ll be taking a pass on. Between Michael Moore and this clown, I’ve seen about 1/4 of one movie of theirs. That’s all I could stomach.

[Da Coyote]

Next film is about Hillary’s nobel prize for physics? And the firefight that ensued when she landed to collect the prize?

[Borges]

This isn’t history it’s fiction.

[SF Republican]

you can expect credibility and even sanity to be in short supply and the DUers/moveoners will eat it up and the rest of the country will not care.

[allmendream]

How long can a free society last that DOESN'T ‘allow’ Oliver Stone his freedom to make his movies?

The moment the government stops him from making his silly movies is the moment our Republic ceases to be free.

Don't throw a hissy. The movie will probably flop, costing Oliver Stoned a lot of money, and costing its viewers a few hours of their life.

Lets not kill the 1st Amendment over this little bit of inanity.

[karnage]

“World Trade Center” was quite good.

[Berosus]

“Between Michael Moore and this clown, I’ve seen about 1/4 of one movie of theirs. That’s all I could stomach.”

That’s better than I’ve done. I don’t think I have ever seen anything that either of them produced. Warnings about the film being a bomb always warned me off first.