Posted on 03/22/2008 9:59:57 AM PDT by ricks_place
The region of the ocean known as "the desert of the sea" has expanded dramatically over the past decade, according to a new study. Scientists looking at the color of the ocean from space have found that vast areas that were once green with plankton have been turning blue, as marine life becomes scarcer. If it's linked to global warming, as they suspect, this could be another blow for the world's fisheries.
Just as plants make up the base of the food web on land, tiny green phytoplankton in the ocean are a critical foodstuff for life in the oceans. And Jeff Polovina, at a National Marine Fisheries Service lab in Hawaii, has been watching by satellite as that greenery in the middle of the ocean is fading away.
"The regions that are showing the lowest amount of plant life, which [are] sometimes referred to as the biological deserts of the ocean, are growing at roughly 1 to 4 percent per year," Polovina says.
One to 4 percent may not sound like all that much, but these regions are huge to begin with. So this marine desert has grown by 2.5 million square miles in the past decade. That's an area the size of Texas every year. Polovina makes the analogy to deserts on land, creeping into more productive environments.
"We have the same thing here," he says. "These less productive areas are replacing the slightly more productive areas of the ocean."
Link to Global Warming
And it seems to be tied to global warming. Polovina's study, published in Geophysical Research Letters, finds that the areas of low productivity are expanding in lockstep with increasing water temperatures. As surface temperatures warm, that prevents colder water from rising up from the depths. And that colder water carries the nutrients that would feed the algae.
Scientists studying climate change have predicted this kind of change. But the sea desert has been spreading 10 times faster than climate scientists predicted. So Polovina is a bit cautious this could be a shorter-term fluctuation, not a permanent change.
"In the next 10 years, maybe it could switch back," he says. "Until we get a much longer time series, we don't know."
Long-Term Outlook
Whatever the case, the speed of change in the ocean is disturbing to marine scientists like Paul Falkowski at Rutgers University.
"It is amazingly fast if true," Falkowski says.
He says marine scientists using more primitive instruments from ships saw this trend starting long ago, back in the early days of the Industrial Revolution.
"We can see that over 100 years, the ocean has gotten clearer and clearer in the center," Falkowski explains. "So this is a long-term trend."
He, too, isn't sure that the trend will keep up at its current speed. But the long-term outlook is unsettling. He says the South Pacific Ocean is currently the clearest and least productive region of the Earth's oceans.
"If we made the entire world's oceans like that, we'd probably reduce the productivity by at least a factor of two. And that would be an extraordinarily large change, which I don't want to think about," Falkowski says.
Fisheries, which are already under heavy stress from nets and lines, would suffer even more, he says. Reefs would suffer, too. In all, the outlook for the oceans is bleak.
And we may not be fully aware of the situation as it changes. The satellite that made these critical measurements is nearing the end of its lifespan, and there is no full replacement in the works. So, in a few years, U.S. scientists may not be able to look at the color of the ocean from space to track this trend.
A new study reveals the extent of the "desert of the sea," shown here in black,
where plant life is the lowest. This image is an average of ocean chlorophyll
over the study's nine-year period. NOAA
'Cause the desert had turned to sea
There were plants and birds and rocks and things
there was sand and hills and rings
The ocean is a desert with it's life underground
And a perfect disguise above
Under the cities lies a heart made of ground
But the humans will give no love
i've always liked this song... A Horse With No Name...
“We have the same thing here,” he says. “These less productive areas are replacing the slightly more productive areas of the ocean.”
But “DEAD ZONE” has such a nicer ring to it than “slightly less productive area”
I read an article about CO2 that was suggesting that excess CO2 could be taken out to sea and injected into the oceans to dispose of it. Someone trying to make a buck.
This all started about the time every one said to ‘save the whales’. We did and now they are killing our planet. Kill the Whales and Save the Earth! Unleash the Japanese and the Norwegians!
(For all liberal lurkers, the preceding was what is know as a “joke”. Look it up.)
and all of the sudden the BS meter pegged...
Click on POGW graphic for full GW rundown
New!!: Dr. John Ray's
GREENIE WATCH
The Great Global Warming Swindle Video - back on the net!! (click here)
Ping me if you find one I've missed.
![]() |
||
· join · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post new topic · | ||
|
|||
Gods |
Note: this topic is from March 2008. |
||
· Mirabilis · Texas AM Anthropology News · Yahoo Anthro & Archaeo · · History or Science & Nature Podcasts · Excerpt, or Link only? · cgk's list of ping lists · |
The real motivation for the sensationalism.
I just read an article on this ‘dead zone’ topic which says that the areas are about doubling every 10 years. This source said the principal cause was nitrogen fertilizer. If so, this is a strong incentive to move toward organic agriculture, and the use of natural nitrogen sources like legume cover crops. This problem may be distinct from global climate change, and more easily fixed by changing some of our habits.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.