Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Birth control pills spark debate over environment
Columbia News Service ^ | Mar. 15, 2008 | LISA CUPIDO

Posted on 03/17/2008 1:06:19 PM PDT by Between the Lines

Wherever possible, Tina Casale switches to compact fluorescent light bulbs; she also recycles daily, rides in carpools or walks when she can, and, as a third-grade teacher, has made it a priority to ensure that global warming is a frequent topic in her science discussions.

But in the eyes of some activists, Casale could be doing more to save the environment: Namely, tossing out her birth control pills.

Birth control pills, like batteries and baby bottles, have become the latest item in American homes to become a focus of environmental and health concerns. As scientists debate the effects of synthetic hormones that are flushed into waterways, the potential threat has sparked a clash between advocates and critics of the pill.

"I've heard a little bit about the bad things that birth control can do to the environment," said Casale, 26, who lives in New York City. "If it's causing major problems, I guess I would stop. But to me, the health effects of the pill are a much greater concern than the fate of fish."

In 2003, a group of scientists in Washington state made headlines when they discovered that traces of synthetic estrogen in the state's rivers had reduced the fertility of male fish. Hormonal birth control pills and patches were blamed. Two years later, a team of scientists funded by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency found trout with both female and male characteristics. The culprit, again, was synthetic estrogen.

David Norris, a physiology professor at the University of Colorado, said it is not just estrogen's possible negative effects on aquatic environments that concern him as much as the exposure of these hormones to humans, especially fetuses and newborns. Norris said numerous reports show that estrogenic chemicals in water can result in thyroid problems and an adrenaline imbalance. Thyroid inhibitors are of major concern because they affect the nervous system's development and can cause permanent mental retardation.

Although Norris points out that certain foods, plastics, cosmetics, personal-care products and animal wastes are also causing water contamination, studies in Boulder Creek, Colo., have shown that fish are about 10 times more sensitive to the contribution of estrogen from birth control pills than they are to estradiol, the type of natural estrogen excreted by animals like cows.

The National Catholic Register and WorldNet Daily, a conservative Web publication, seized on the findings, the latter calling birth control pills "poison." The discovery left some environmentally conscious women shaking their heads, unsure of what to make of all this talk of genetically mutated fish and unsafe drinking water.

"It gets me angry," said Tracy Oetting, 47, an environmental and political activist from Washington. "It appears that there is no concern for women or the environment if everyone is OK with the eco-damage that hormones can do to women, men, fish and animals."

Laurel Butler, 60, a New York member of the Sierra Club, a grassroots environmental organization, says she doesn't believe in infringing on other people's rights to make decisions. But if birth control pills are proven to be the culprit, she says she would stand by a law that protects the environment against estrogen.

"Why aren't women in this generation doing more to protect the environment?" Butler said. "You've got a population screaming for instant, easy birth control and pharmaceutical companies answering to their demands. Who is responsible for the environment?"

Effect is disputed

The discourse about hormone-free waters has extended to online message boards and other sites. One group on Facebook started an anti-estrogens campaign. On its home page, the small group shares claims that a decrease in human sperm count over the years is a result of hormones in drinking water and urges women to stop taking the pill if they're not in a relationship.

But many women and women's groups are not buying into the message.

"It sounds to me like this is a pollution issue rather than a birth control issue," said Kaycie Rene Booher, 20, a student at the University of Central Missouri. "People are jumping for a chance to discredit birth control as an important option for women's health and safety."

Heather Trim, the urban bays and toxics program manager at the People for Puget Sound in Washington, warns women that there is no evidence in the United States of the human impact of contaminated estrogen water, and that women should not discard their pills just yet.

"Estrogen is also found in products like hair straighteners and plastics," said Trim. "It's not necessarily just birth control."

Paige Novak, an associate professor of engineering at the University of Minnesota, agrees.

"There isn't a whole lot of funding going toward updating waste center treatments," she said. "The problem might be resolved just by updating the plants."

Amy Allina, the program director of the National Women's Health Network, says women should be aware that some forms of contraception, such as the patch and vaginal ring, seep more hormones into the environment because they are discarded directly into the garbage after use. The competition among pharmaceutical companies for a slice of the oral contraceptive market is so fierce, she said, that the development of an "eco-friendly" birth control pill could be just around the corner. Bayer and Pfizer, two leading makers of birth control pills, did not respond to requests for comment.

"At this point we just don't know if the benefits of the pill outweigh its negative environmental effects," Allina said. "Unfortunately, women need to make a decision based on imperfect information."


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: birthcontrol; contraception; ecoweenies; environment; greens; pharmaceuticals; whenagendascollide; women
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

1 posted on 03/17/2008 1:06:21 PM PDT by Between the Lines
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Between the Lines
Wherever possible, Tina Casale switches to compact fluorescent light bulbs; she also recycles daily, rides in carpools or walks when she can

Does she have a clothesline, or is walking to & fro to inconveniencing?

2 posted on 03/17/2008 1:08:24 PM PDT by Puppage (You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Between the Lines
Flush some viagra to counteract the bc pills......
3 posted on 03/17/2008 1:10:09 PM PDT by b4its2late (GITMO is way too nice of a place to house low life terrorists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Between the Lines
Laurel Butler, 60, a New York member of the Sierra Club, a grassroots environmental organization, says she doesn't believe in infringing on other people's rights to make decisions.

The only reason the sierra club exists is to "infring[e] on other people's rights."

4 posted on 03/17/2008 1:13:36 PM PDT by RobinOfKingston (Man, that's stupid ... even by congressional standards.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Between the Lines
she says she would stand by a law that protects the environment against estrogen.

There's a fantastic joke here, just can't come up with it right this second.

5 posted on 03/17/2008 1:19:18 PM PDT by wbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: b4its2late

or anabolic steroids :o


6 posted on 03/17/2008 1:19:49 PM PDT by ChurtleDawg (voting only encourages them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RobinOfKingston

Sure, get rid of birth control to have more abortions. The libs would just love that.


7 posted on 03/17/2008 1:20:38 PM PDT by dragonblustar (Once abolish the God, and the government becomes the God - G. K. Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Between the Lines
"If it's causing major problems, I guess I would stop. But to me, the health effects of the pill are a much greater concern than the fate of fish."

Hallmark of today's liberal Democrats.

"I'm all for it, unless it affects me."

8 posted on 03/17/2008 1:23:03 PM PDT by VeniVidiVici (Benedict Arnold was against the Terrorist Surveillance Program)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: b4its2late
Let the damn polar icecaps melt and dilute it.


Qattara Depression

If Greenland melted down completely, 88% of the excess water produced could be contained by flooding the uninhabited Qatarra Depression in northwest Egypt, producing thousands of miles of valuable lakefront property, generating electrical power as water flowed from the Medditerranean to the depression and potentially turning much of the surrounding Sahara Desert into arable land.

It took Greenland 18,000 years to accumulate as much ice as it has now. How long do you think it will take it to melt?

9 posted on 03/17/2008 1:23:57 PM PDT by Vigilanteman ((Are there any men left in Washington? Or are there only cowards? Ahmad Shah Massoud))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Puppage

“Wherever possible, Tina Casale switches to compact fluorescent light bulbs; she also recycles daily, rides in carpools or walks when she can, and, as a third-grade teacher, has made it a priority to ensure that global warming is a frequent topic in her science discussions.”

All admiral ways to be good stewards of the environment....but to stop global warming? lol Yikes.


10 posted on 03/17/2008 1:25:14 PM PDT by Slapshot68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Between the Lines

“Our Stolen Future: Birth control pills alter gender of male fish ...” Check google on what’s happening to fish. Future work force coming from unaffected third world countries. Today Mexico, tomorrow the world.


11 posted on 03/17/2008 1:28:45 PM PDT by ex-snook ("Above all things, truth beareth away the victory.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Between the Lines

The fish can kiss my butt. I would not be able to function for several days every month due to severe cramps if I wasn’t on the pill. Not having kids every couple of years is only a side benefit.
Change the water treatment plants. I’m sure some treatment could chelate estrogens, they just need to find it.


12 posted on 03/17/2008 1:32:30 PM PDT by Libertarianchick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Between the Lines

I don’t care if the earth collapses into a black hole, please, PLEASE do not let these people stop taking their anti-psychotic drugs to protect us from GLOBAL WARMING!


13 posted on 03/17/2008 1:32:39 PM PDT by unixfox (The 13th Amendment Abolished Slavery, The 16th Amendment Reinstated It !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wbill

LOL...thats exactly what I thought...Can you make a law protecting us from estrogen?

thats just too funny.


14 posted on 03/17/2008 1:34:23 PM PDT by KOZ. (Fred Thompson uses a beyonet as a toothpick.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Between the Lines

Didn’t the hormones-in-water-horrible-effects thing happen a few years ago and was totally debunked?


15 posted on 03/17/2008 1:37:18 PM PDT by CPOSharky (Energy plan: Build refineries and nuke plants, drill for our oil, mine our coal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Between the Lines

Some group is developing a PSA to teach people how to *properly* dispose of their meds.

What about recycling sweat, urine and feces?


16 posted on 03/17/2008 1:37:48 PM PDT by wolfcreek (Hank Hill's Dad, Cruella and Curious George=Loony Toons)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KOZ.
Can you make a law protecting us from estrogen?...Banning Hillary! and the NOW gang comes to mind. I'd feel safer.

But that's still not the right joke...still fishing around for it.

17 posted on 03/17/2008 1:37:49 PM PDT by wbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: b4its2late; ChurtleDawg
"Flush some viagra to counteract the bc pills..."

Noooo!

VIAGRA SPILL REVIVES LAKE MICHIGAN
Once-Cold and Torpid, Waterway Now Greatest of Great Lakes

   Time-Lapse Satellite Images
Lake Michigan Before Viagra Spill
Lake Michigan During Viagra Spill
Lake Michigan Atter Viagra Spill
 

Chicago (SatireWire.com) — A freighter containing 62,000 metric tons of popular impotence drug Viagra struck a reef and sank in Lake Michigan today. As a result, the once-frigid lake no longer dangles into Illinois and Indiana, but now spans majestically across northern Wisconsin.

According to eyewitnesses, roughly 30 to 60 minutes after the ship's contents dissolved, the lake slowly but firmly began to push northwest toward Minnesota. Eventually, its swollen banks managed to poke aside Lake Superior, which cartographers said will lose its standing as the largest of the Great Lakes for the next four to six hours.

Area residents were surprised by the sudden shift, but conceded Michigan was "like an entirely new lake."

"For so many years that lake just, you know, sat there," said Martha Strop of Eau Claire, Wisc. "To be honest, I never even thought about it anymore. There wasn't much of a point. But now, well, this has changed our lives forever."

Government officials, however, were more cautious.

In Wisconsin, Gov. Scott McCallum declared a state of emergency, while in Minnesota, Gov. Jesse Ventura declared: "Is Lake Michigan a threat, or is it just glad to see me?"


 

Copyright © 2002, SatireWire.

http://www.satirewire.com/news/july02/viagra.shtml

 

 

18 posted on 03/17/2008 1:43:20 PM PDT by CarrotAndStick (The articles posted by me needn't necessarily reflect my opinion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Between the Lines
as a third-grade teacher, has made it a priority to ensure that global warming is a frequent topic in her science discussions.

Does that mean she's brainwashing her little skulls full of mush with the Algore party line, or that she's giving the kids all sides of the story so they can make informed judgements about it? I'm assuming the former.

19 posted on 03/17/2008 1:57:58 PM PDT by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Between the Lines
Laurel Butler, 60, a New York member of the Sierra Club, a grassroots environmental organization, says she doesn't believe in infringing on other people's rights to make decisions. But if birth control pills are proven to be the culprit, she says she would stand by a law that protects the environment against estrogen.

"Why aren't women in this generation doing more to protect the environment?" Butler said. "You've got a population screaming for instant, easy birth control and pharmaceutical companies answering to their demands. Who is responsible for the environment?"

Hey Laurel, its YOUR generation that brought The Pill, demands for it, and the environmental destruction it has caused. Not todays generation. Its YOUR FAULT!!!

Seriously. Can the environmental movement and Church of Algore get any more wacky?

20 posted on 03/17/2008 1:59:05 PM PDT by Phantom Lord (Fall on to your knees for the Phantom Lord)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson