To: rface
Why don’t we tax the Democrats to pay for the revote....we already paid for a primary here in FL.
To: aberaussie
Yes, if Hillary wants a re-vote, let her pay for it.
4 posted on
03/05/2008 9:31:18 AM PST by
sweetiepiezer
(DO NOT EAT the white snow.)
To: aberaussie
>>>Why dont we tax the Democrats to pay for the revote....<<<
Heck, I'll pay for the revote if you'll buy the popcorn!
[/grin]
11 posted on
03/05/2008 9:35:23 AM PST by
HardStarboard
(Take No Prisoners - We're Out Of Qurans)
To: aberaussie
12 posted on
03/05/2008 9:36:07 AM PST by
Red in Blue PA
(Truth : Liberals :: Kryptonite : Superman)
To: aberaussie
Why dont we tax the Democrats to pay for the revote....we already paid for a primary here in FL. Agreed! Why the heck should the taxpayers pay for two elections because the Dims couldn't get their act together? The Dims didn't have anyone sentient enough to think this through and see not seating delegations from two big states was not a tenable policy???
To: aberaussie
I agree. When the Primary is tacked on to normal election cycles I don’t have a problem with taxpayer payment for costs. When the election is at the sole behest of a non-Gov’t entity (Which Political Parties are) then it is up to them to foot the bill - Especially in this particular instance where it was so botched.
27 posted on
03/05/2008 9:45:50 AM PST by
TCats
(The Clintons Are Not Just Wrong - They Are Certifiable AND Dangerous! See my Page)
To: aberaussie
35 posted on
03/05/2008 9:52:29 AM PST by
SkyPilot
To: aberaussie
I’m predicting that the Florida Supreme Court will once again get involved in election politics before all this is over...
Pass the popcorn..
44 posted on
03/05/2008 9:56:12 AM PST by
Wil H
To: aberaussie
Why dont we tax the Democrats to pay for the revote. Awesome idea! Hit everyone that votes with, say, a $50 fee to offset re-vote costs. Let Democrats be true to their word and help government by contributing more, and avert crossover voting at the same time. What a noble thing for Democrats to do.
64 posted on
03/05/2008 10:24:31 AM PST by
polymuser
(Those who believe in something eventually prevail over those who believe in nothing.)
To: aberaussie
Will this mean that rats who voted in the Republican primaries in those states will now be able to vote for rats in these states? That means rats choose the candidates of both parties?
66 posted on
03/05/2008 10:26:51 AM PST by
isrul
(n)
To: aberaussie
A group of tax-payers in florida and michigan should sue and get an injunction against the state to stop them from spending tax payer money to finance another primary for the Dems. May not work but would cost the dems money to fight and would point out the idiocy of this idea.
74 posted on
03/05/2008 11:08:28 AM PST by
Froggie
To: aberaussie
Why dont we tax the Democrats to pay for the revote....we already paid for a primary here in FL. Unfortunately, can't be done:
Amendment XXIV
Section 1. The right of citizens of the United States to vote in any primary or other election for President or Vice President, for electors for President or Vice President, or for Senator or Representative in Congress, shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or any state by reason of failure to pay any poll tax or other tax.
Section 2. The Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.
75 posted on
03/05/2008 11:11:34 AM PST by
kidd
To: aberaussie
Why dont we tax the Democrats to pay for the revote....
FL and MI should tell the DNC: "You want a re-vote? You pay for it."
80 posted on
03/05/2008 11:19:50 AM PST by
no dems
(Political Correctness is Fascism.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson