Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Chavez orders troops to Colombian border (10 battalions, WAR?)
KRIS ^

Posted on 03/02/2008 10:35:00 AM PST by MeanGreen2008

CARACAS, Venezuela (AP) - Venezuela's President Hugo Chavez is sending 10 battalions of troops to country's border with Colombia.

He's also ordered the Venezuelan embassy in Bogota closed and say all embassy personnel will be withdrawn from Colombia.

The announcements by Venezuela's leftist leader pushed relations with its neighbor to their tensest point of his 9-year presidency.

Chavez is also warning that Colombia could spark a war in South America, calling its U.S.-allied government "a terrorist state" and labeling President Alvaro Uribe (oo-REE'-bay) "a criminal."


TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: battalion; battalions; chavez; colombia; commie; coward; hugochavez; kneejerk; posturing; psycho; venezuela; venezuelantroops
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 361-373 next last
To: Rb ver. 2.0

Wow. By quick count that makes 668 targets.


161 posted on 03/02/2008 2:17:22 PM PST by EternalVigilance (McCain supporters: "We have nothing to offer but fear itself!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
The US military might have to take five minutes from its other duties to smash this lunatic.

You overstate the threat. I think maybe we should just send TEXAS and be done with the matter. It won't take long.

162 posted on 03/02/2008 2:18:40 PM PST by ExSoldier (Democracy is 2 wolves and a lamb voting on dinner. Liberty is a well armed lamb contesting the vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 1COUNTER-MORTER-68

ping!


163 posted on 03/02/2008 2:19:41 PM PST by nicmarlo (A vote for McRino is a false mandate for McShamnesty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rdl6989
AMX-30 tank
164 posted on 03/02/2008 2:23:07 PM PST by rdl6989
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: MeanGreen2008

I actually live and work in Colombia. Understandably this makes me a little nervous.


165 posted on 03/02/2008 2:23:16 PM PST by Piedra79
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kempo

“Consumers decides what the price will be by how much they are willing to pay.”

So...how much they are willing to pay. So I can go to my local gas station and negotiate a lower price for my gas? Sorry, but even when consumption is relatively steady, any change in world events seems to trigger a sharp rise in the prices even when those events are unlikely to affect supply or would have a negligible effect on supply.


166 posted on 03/02/2008 2:26:33 PM PST by neutronsgalore (Nature, getting rid of Muslims one tsunami at a time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: Fox_Mulder77

“That’s why we have nuclear weapons. Sad to say, but the only thing keeping China and Russia in place is our nuclear arsenal.”

Especially since an ever increasing portion of our economy and military are dependent upon supply from countries that China could interdict or intimidate.


167 posted on 03/02/2008 2:29:15 PM PST by neutronsgalore (Nature, getting rid of Muslims one tsunami at a time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: xjcsa
If the oil were not more valuable to the buyer than the money paid for it, the buyer would just keep his money and go without the oil.

You may be able to make this statement regarding most other consumables, but not with oil and gasoline. It is not a matter of whether the product is "valuable" to the consumer. It is a matter of the product is vital to the consumer. You go ahead and try and make it through a day, week, month, or year without purchasing that which is required to either move people, goods, or services and see what happens. Everything would come to a standstill without petroleum, and the oil companies know this. They know that despite whatever artificially inflated price they come up with consumers will HAVE TO BUY fuel. The oil companies also are pretty savy in the artificial price hikes. They raise them to a point just shy of where consumers will begin to revolt, and then drop them a bit for a while. Then, start the process all over again. They've been doing this since the late 1990's as they've factored into their profit margins that consumers will cry, but not do anything different as long as they engage in this practice at a slow pace. It's like placing a frog into a boiling pot of water versus putting a frog into a pot of cold water and slowly raising the temperature. The frog dropped into the boiling water will attempt to get out. The frog in the water that is slowly raised to a boil will do nothing and eventually be boiled to death.

168 posted on 03/02/2008 2:33:00 PM PST by SoldierDad (Proud Dad of a 2nd BCT 10th Mountain Soldier home after 15 months in the Triangle of death)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: Carling
how Obama will react once many foolish FReepers “teach McCain a lesson”.

...as if the registered users on this site are going to make any difference in the November elections.

Those of us who don't vote for McCain are going to destroy the world?

I am not holding my nose to vote for anyone anymore. That is how we got to a socialist GOP.

169 posted on 03/02/2008 2:34:42 PM PST by NoControllingLegalAuthority
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: MeanGreen2008
Yeah... that theory has worked out well so far...

Better than what? None of us know how the alternative would have worked out, so that statement is nonsensical, unless you meant to post that over at DU.

There is a price, whether it's $110 or $150 per bbl, where it IS cheaper just to invade an oil dictatorship and run the place ourselves. It's simple economics. If you are an oil dictator, bent on making money, make sure you don't rachet the price up to that unknown number.

170 posted on 03/02/2008 2:35:13 PM PST by Republic of Texas (Socialism Always Fails)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: GAB-1955

“...their Air Force is mostly transport and a few ground-attack craft.”

Their Air Force is comprised almost exclusively with narcotics transport planes.


171 posted on 03/02/2008 2:36:12 PM PST by ought-six
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: NoControllingLegalAuthority

Besides, McCain doesn’t need Conservatives. He has that army of Moderates.


172 posted on 03/02/2008 2:36:43 PM PST by Republic of Texas (Socialism Always Fails)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

To: MeanGreen2008

Perhaps we should send Obama to talk to him. /s


173 posted on 03/02/2008 2:37:23 PM PST by mainepatsfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mainepatsfan

I expect Jimmuh Cawtuh to fly down first thing in the morning. He is good friends with Baby Huey.


174 posted on 03/02/2008 2:41:45 PM PST by rdl6989
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]

To: NoControllingLegalAuthority
Then please be sure to not complain about our country’s disintegration once a woefully inept Obama is in the White House.

Hell, at least McCain backs Israel’s basic right to bomb a nuke facility in Syria. Obama can’t even get himself to admit that Syria was even building a nuke facility. Yet he takes the suspect NIE about Iran's lack of nukes seriously and without question.

I’m not a McCain supporter by nature, but have you heard what Obama talks about in his speeches and during debates? My hope is that you will woof about McCain, but once the curtain closes, you know that you have no other realistic choice.

175 posted on 03/02/2008 2:43:30 PM PST by Carling (It's Danny, Sir)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

To: rdl6989

First he’ll go on the Today show and blame this entirely on Columbia and the U.S.


176 posted on 03/02/2008 2:43:57 PM PST by mainepatsfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies]

To: Republic of Texas

“For just a moment, imagine 10 battalions of the mexican military sent to our border. How would that strike you?”

It would strike me as a target-rich environment.


177 posted on 03/02/2008 2:44:41 PM PST by ought-six
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: ought-six

Our guys can never get enough practice!


178 posted on 03/02/2008 2:46:13 PM PST by Republic of Texas (Socialism Always Fails)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
The US military might have to take five minutes from its other duties to smash this lunatic.

nah.I thik we'll be leaving this b****slap to the Columbians. ;-)

179 posted on 03/02/2008 2:50:17 PM PST by uglybiker (I do not suffer from mental illness. I quite enjoy it, actually.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: M203M4

Why Democrats should not occupy the White House. Think Barack (no middle name) Obama is going to be any better?


180 posted on 03/02/2008 2:56:15 PM PST by popdonnelly (Get Reid. Salazar, and Harkin out of the Senate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 361-373 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson