Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Anti-Catholic pastor who endorsed McCain likened to Farrakhan
CNA ^ | March 1, 2008

Posted on 03/01/2008 6:21:35 AM PST by NYer

Sen. John McCain / Rev. John Hagee

Washington DC, Mar 1, 2008 / 03:43 am (CNA).- The endorsement of Senator John McCain by a Catholic-bashing Texas minister won swift rebuke from the president of the Catholic League and a Jewish leader concerned about his “vicious and inflammatory” anti-Catholicism. 

Both compared the minister to Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan.

On Wednesday Pastor John Hagee endorsed Senator John McCain’s bid to become the Republican presidential candidate in the 2008 election. 

Senator McCain responded to the endorsement by calling Hagee “the staunchest leader of our Christian evangelical movement,” praising Hagee’s pro-Israel stance.

President of the Catholic League Bill Donohue harshly criticized the endorsement.

“There are plenty of staunch evangelical leaders who are pro-Israel, but are not anti-Catholic. John Hagee is not one of them,” Donohue said on Thursday.  “Indeed, for the past few decades, he has waged an unrelenting war against the Catholic Church. For example, he likes calling it ‘The Great Whore,’ an ‘apostate church,’ the ‘anti-Christ,’ and a ‘false cult system’.”

Donohue said that in Pastor Hagee’s latest book the minister claimed Hitler was a Catholic who murdered Jews while the Catholic Church did nothing.  “The sell-out of Catholicism to Hitler began not with the people but with the Vatican itself,” wrote Hagee, according to Bill Donohue.

Donohue criticized the remarks, saying, “For the record, Hitler persecuted the Catholic Church and was automatically excommunicated in 1931—two years before he assumed power—when he acted as best man at Joseph Goebbel’s Protestant wedding. Hitler even bragged about his separation from the Church. As for doing nothing about the Holocaust, Sir Martin Gilbert reminds us that Goebbel denounced Pope Pius XII for his 1942 Christmas message criticizing the Nazis (the New York Times lauded the pope for doing so in an editorial for two years in a row). Much to Hagee’s chagrin, Gilbert also says that Pius XII saved three quarters of the Jews in Rome, and that more Jews were saved proportionately in Catholic countries than Protestant countries.”

Rabbi Irwin Kula, president of the National Jewish Center for Learning and Leadership, echoed Donohue’s criticisms.  In a Friday statement, Rabbi Kula said, “Just as Jews and other people of good will have appropriately demanded that Barack Obama unambiguously renounce and reject the endorsement of Minister Louis Farrakhan because of his bigotry and rabid anti-Semitism so Jews and other people of good will should demand that John McCain renounce and reject the endorsement of Pastor John Hagee because of his vicious and inflammatory anti-Catholicism.”

Rabbi Kula said Pastor Hagee’s position on Israel “does not mean he should be given carte blanche to denigrate and malign another religion.”  He continued, saying, “Barack Obama showed his integrity when he rejected Minister Farrakhan’s hate whatever the political costs and sensitivities. John McCain is also a man of integrity. He needs to similarly reject Pastor Hagee’s hate whatever the political calculations and consequences.”

In a Friday statement Bill Donohue said Senator McCain’s opponent for the nomination, former Arkansas Governor Mike Huckabee, had expressed “disappointment and surprise” that Hagee had not chosen him.  Donohue also compared Hagee to Louis Farrakhan, wondering why the candidates were fighting over the endorsement of such a figure.

Donohue also called on McCain to shun Hagee’s endorsement.

“Just this week, McCain repudiated the remarks of talk radio host Bill Cunningham,” Donohue said.  “He should now repudiate Hagee’s long record of bashing Catholicism. After all, George W. Bush apologized for speaking at Bob Jones University, and Hagee makes Jones look like a lightweight in the ring of bigotry."


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Philosophy; Politics/Elections; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: catholicbashing; farrakhan; hagee; hageebashing; icallbs; johnhagee; mccain; tx2008
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 301-304 next last
To: NYer

What slays me is how easy it is to slam an evangelical who speaks his mind on what he believes but if a liberal says something about others, he is lauded for his courage.

And I don’t even like Hagee, nor have I heard his pronouncements, but liberal pastors say much worse about Jews or Bible believers in general and get talk shows for doing so.


41 posted on 03/01/2008 7:39:12 AM PST by RaceBannon (Innocent until proven guilty; The Pendleton 8: We are not going down without a fight)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zuben Elgenubi

Huuck and Hagee are much closer in theology than McCain is with anyone who sites in a church at all on Sunday.


42 posted on 03/01/2008 7:41:09 AM PST by RaceBannon (Innocent until proven guilty; The Pendleton 8: We are not going down without a fight)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Doctor Don
BTW, Hagee's theological position regarding the modern state of Israel as well as their place in Salvation puts him at serious odds with the Catholic church in toto ~ the Pope and other primates have wanted Jerusalem separately recognized as an international city. Plus Catholics, in toto, pray for the conversion of the Jews.

Hagee says Jerusalem belongs to the Jews, and the Jews already have a valid path to redemption and need not convert.

You really can't hold Hagee's beliefs regarding Jews and not run into trouble with Rome.

43 posted on 03/01/2008 7:44:49 AM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Barnacle

So? He is not running for anything. If you agree on politics then what does it matter. As long as you stay free to defend your faith, as long as Hagee’s beliefs are not imposed on you by law, what does it matter? I vote for Catholics all the time and I’m not Catholic. The guy is a pastor. He will be vocal about his beliefs. Or at least I would hope so. It’s not like Catholic priests and bishops and theologians want to be stiffled in expressing their theological disagreements for the sake of political unity. No one should have to sacrifice one for the other. If we agree on moral principles and political structure of government then we should be happy. Let the divisions of religion and theology remain and be debated/defended. That’s the only way religious freedom survives.


44 posted on 03/01/2008 7:52:07 AM PST by The Ghost of FReepers Past (Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light..... Isaiah 5:20)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: NYer
"“Just this week, McCain repudiated the remarks of talk radio host Bill Cunningham,” Donohue said. “He should now repudiate Hagee’s long record of bashing Catholicism."

It would have been OK for Cunningham to bash Catholics. Unfortunately the GOP tolerates just anti-Catholicism.

45 posted on 03/01/2008 7:59:57 AM PST by ex-snook ("Above all things, truth beareth away the victory.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: trisham
Well then McCain should have catholic endorsers apologize for not agreeing with protestants and all other people they disagree with. Where do we draw the line?

Bush shouldn't have apologized for the past errant policies of Bob Jones University. People shouldn't go around apologizing for other people's mistakes. They especially shouldn't apologize for other people's differing theology.

Apparently I had more faith in the reasoned response of Catholics than I should have. If we are political allies, shouldn't that be enough? Must everyone forever be silent about their theological disagreements? Is that really a rule Catholics want to live by themselves? If you save your own ears from offense it will come at the expense of your own freedom to speak about your beliefs.

46 posted on 03/01/2008 8:01:51 AM PST by The Ghost of FReepers Past (Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light..... Isaiah 5:20)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: The Ghost of FReepers Past
I am sure Catholics can handle the fact that Hagee disagrees with their theology. The feeling is probably mutual. Okay, so how about politics? Same beliefs? If so then you are allies for that one purpose. This isn't difficult. McCain isn't representing anyone's theology.

Well stated, but the idea is lost on those who seemingly want to be offended.

47 posted on 03/01/2008 8:06:48 AM PST by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

“Bill Donohue appears ready to repudiate the Peace of Westphalia and reinitiate the Thirty Years War.Catholics should take this guy by the shorthairs and toss him under the nearest ecclesiastical bus before he uses any more fighting words.”

No thanks. Bill Donohue is a true Catholic hero.


48 posted on 03/01/2008 8:08:26 AM PST by cowtowney
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Emmett McCarthy
So he was baptised as a Catholic in infancy and that makes the Catholic Church complicit in his subsequent evil?

It wasn't his baptism but his later dealings with Eugenio Pacelli --

49 posted on 03/01/2008 8:09:35 AM PST by Uncle Chip (TRUTH : Ignore it. Deride it. Allegorize it. Interpret it. But you can't ESCAPE it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
Donohoe hardly defends Catholics or Catholicism.

This Catholic is grateful for him.

50 posted on 03/01/2008 8:10:47 AM PST by Barnacle (Reagan Republicanism R.I.P.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Soliton
“Hitler regarded himself as a Catholic until he died. “I am now as before a Catholic and will always remain so,” he told Gerhard Engel, one of his generals, in 1941.”

He may have been baptized a Catholic, but he was a pagan, looking to re-create a Germany that never existed. He persecuted Catholic priests, nuns and laypeople almost as much as he did the Jews, because they were standing up against his racist policies.

51 posted on 03/01/2008 8:14:30 AM PST by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: ecomcon; The Ghost of FReepers Past
In 2006, Catholics voted 55% Democrat vs 44% Republican. Catholic leadership seems more liberal than the laity. I see this as Catholic leadership wants a Democrat.

That would imply that 55% of Catholics are not followers of the Christ.

Only pagans vote to murder innocent babies and promote perversion and steal and covet.

shalom b'SHEM Yah'shua
52 posted on 03/01/2008 8:15:23 AM PST by Uri’el-2012 (you shall know that I, YHvH, your Savior, and your Redeemer, am the Elohim of Ya'aqob. Isaiah 60:16)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: ecomcon
In 2006, Catholics voted 55% Democrat vs 44% Republican.

Interesting, because in 2000 and 2004, I believe that George W. Bush got a majority of the Catholic vote. It likely changed in 2006, because the Democrats were very public in running 'pro-life' Democrats, so all those Democrats in blue collar areas who would not have voted for a Democrat in the recent past felt like they could do so in good conscience. They didn't realize that no matter now pro-life an individual Dem might be, he or she will have absolutely NO power in Congress to do anything about it.

53 posted on 03/01/2008 8:18:30 AM PST by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: kjo
Just another of the one hundred or more reasons to not vote for McLame.

So you'll feel better when Hillary or Obama is holding the office of President of The United States?

54 posted on 03/01/2008 8:19:54 AM PST by Bloody Sam Roberts (Great spirits will always encounter violent opposition from mediocre minds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Barnacle
Look, he's speaking for an organization that reflects a voting group that is predominantly Democrat and not Republican.

You never hear Donohoe take a swipe at Democrats. Let's hear him argue theology with Obama's minister first.

You might well reconsider what it is you're grateful for when it comes to this guy. Remember, he's speaking for the entirity of Roman Catholicism, and Orthodoxy, and the Coptics when he sounds off. That's about 2 billion people! Hagee speaks only for Hagee ~ a minister at a non-denominational church ~ a mere 15,000 people.

55 posted on 03/01/2008 8:24:43 AM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Chip
It wasn't his baptism but his later dealings with Eugenio Pacelli --

Neither the Pope, nor the Church, was never in league with Hitler, revisionist history to the contrary. The Catholic Church was the only major religious institution that spoke out against Hitler during WWII. Hitler hated the Pope, and it was the first time in history that the Swiss Guard actually carried firearms, in order to protect Vatican City.

The Pope allowed many networks to run, and funded them when possible, that saved many Jews throughout Europe. The actions of many priests, nuns and laypeople in trying to save Jews resulted in their being sent to concentration camps, where they died, along with the Jews. The Pope is one of the reasons why Italian Jews survived in such great numbers. Italian Nazis weren't hot to trot about rounding them up, after the order was given. It took the Germans coming into the country to do that. But by then, the escape lines had been well established and were run, not only out of the Vatican, but in parishes all over Italy.

56 posted on 03/01/2008 8:25:27 AM PST by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: cowtowney

Donohue is in violation of the provisions of the Treaty of Westphalia signed by the Pope himself (and not since repudiated by any Pope). He can go to Hell for that sort of thing you know. Hardly makes him a Catholic hero! More a candidate for excommunication.


57 posted on 03/01/2008 8:27:52 AM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
You never hear Donohoe take a swipe at Democrats.

Huh? He does that all the time! He may not take on the Democrat party, but he stands against actions they might take against Catholics. He doesn't argue theology, he's simply defending the right of Catholics to hold our beliefs without persecution and derision by individuals or groups.

58 posted on 03/01/2008 8:28:32 AM PST by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

And I frankly don’t like him that much; he flies off the handle too easily for my taste, but I understand why he does it.


59 posted on 03/01/2008 8:30:26 AM PST by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: SuziQ
He's arguing theology with Hagee. Let's hear him argue theology with Obama's minister.

You really can't cover this little problem up with a mere wave of the hand. It doesn't go away. Donnohue, by a continuing stream of actions like this, let's Conservatives know what a phoney he is.

60 posted on 03/01/2008 8:31:06 AM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 301-304 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson